Washington Capitals\' Matt Pettinger (18) celebrates Chris Clark\'s (17) game-winning goal against the Ottawa Senators during the overtime period of a hockey game, Monday, in Washington. The Capitals won 4-3.(AP Photo/Nick Wass)
Author: The Hockey News
Clark scores overtime goal as Capitals rally to beat Senators 4-3
Well, he's managing to do both at the moment. The reigning Calder Trophy winner as the NHL's top rookie had two goals to help overcome an early three-goal deficit, and Chris Clark scored the winner in overtime, leading the Capitals past the Ottawa Senators 4-3 on Monday night.
"My goal is not to score 52 goals, 56 goals," Ovechkin said. "My goal is to play hard, try to help the team win."
Things didn't look good for Washington at the outset: Ottawa took a 3-0 lead inside 12 minutes, chasing Capitals goalie Olaf Kolzig. But by the end of the night, the Senators were coping with a four-game losing streak.
"The guys were working so hard to protect the lead that we forgot about attacking," Senators coach Bryan Murray said. "You can't hold on all night."
The Capitals have won consecutive games for the first time this season. They improved to 6-4-4 for 16 points, tied for second in the Southeast Division.
After beating the Flyers on Saturday night to stop a 16-game winless drought in Philadelphia, the Capitals ended an eight-game winless skid when hosting Ottawa.
"We're getting better all the time," Ovechkin said.
So, too, is he. The Russian wing has four straight multipoint games to raise his season total to 18 points through 14 games, three points ahead of his pace in 2005-06, when he wound up with 106.
"He just seems to come through," Capitals coach Glen Hanlon said. "For a determined guy, he seems to be even more determined when it gets down to the nitty gritty."
Ovechkin's first goal brought Washington to 3-2 in the second period, and he tied the score with 24.4 seconds left in regulation on a power-play goal from a seemingly impossible angle. Ottawa defenceman Chris Phillips was whistled for tripping with 1:03 to play, only the sixth penalty of the game.
Asked how he managed to squeeze the puck past goalie Martin Gerber, Ovechkin shrugged and said: "I don't know. It doesn't matter."
Clark then scored 1:33 into the extra period off an assist from Alexander Semin, who also assisted on both of Ovechkin's goals.
Daniel Alfredsson, Dany Heatley and Antoine Vermette scored for the Senators during the early spurt, which prompted Hanlon to call timeout and replace Kolzig with backup Brent Johnson.
"I don't know if the change necessarily woke up the team, but I think just being embarrassed ... might have woke guys up," said Kolzig, who faced five shots in his shortest outing since March 2003. "If we didn't straighten things away, it could have been a blowout. (Johnson) came in and settled things down, and we chipped away."
Johnson stopped all 21 shots he faced, allowing Washington to improve to 1-5 in one-goal games this season.
"I don't like a coach saying, 'Well, we had to take him out to change the momentum' or anything. For whatever reason, tonight it felt like it was the thing to do," Hanlon said about making the goalie switch. "There was no panic, and there was no feeling that this game was out of control. We all felt to a man that we were going to come back and win."
Notes: The Senators are 5-7-1 with 40 goals; at the same point a year ago, Ottawa was 11-2 with 64 goals. ... Alfredsson has 24 goals and 18 assists in 37 career games against Washington. ... Ottawa opened a four-game road trip.
The Panthers have been helped in a big way by Jonathan Huberdeau’s return, but there are other teams set to benefit from an important piece getting healthy in time for the homestretch.
Jonathan Huberdeau’s return has given the Florida Panthers a shot in the arm over the past month. In eight games, he has four goals and eight points, has managed 25 shots on goal since his return and is skating more than 17 minutes per outing while once again forming a formidable trio with Aleksander Barkov and Jaromir Jagr.
Not only that, but in the time since he made his season debut at the start of February, the Panthers have dropped just two of eight games, rocketed right into the thick of things in the Eastern Conference wild-card race and are even on the cusp of potentially landing themselves a divisional playoff berth.
Now, as the deadline approaches, Panthers president of hockey operations Dale Tallon, acting as GM while GM-turned-coach Tom Rowe mans the bench, said that he’s going to be looking to add another offensive boost to his lineup if at all possible. However, no matter who Tallon plans or manages to add at the deadline, it’s hard to fathom they’ll have anywhere near the impact that Huberdeau has had since he stepped back into the lineup. In that sense, the best addition the Panthers will likely have made at the deadline won’t come from a trade, but simply by the return of an important player from an absence.
While it’s the Panthers who are benefitting from a healthy lineup now, they aren’t the only club that stands to get a boost just around the deadline when a formerly ailing player gets back into action. There are five players currently sidelined who stand to make an impact for their respective teams upon returning:
5. Joonas Donskoi, San Jose Sharks
Donskoi has been out of action for the past month, over which time he’s missed 12 games. That may not seem like a massive loss, but Donskoi has proven he can bring his A-game at the toughest time of the season. During the Sharks’ run to the Western Conference title and Stanley Cup final in 2015-16, Donskoi scored six goals and 12 points in 24 games while playing bottom-six minutes. That’s the kind of production teams look for from their depth players come playoff time.
Unfortunately, Donskoi hasn’t been near as productive this season with six goals and 15 points through 44 games. Even still, he’s proven he’s a threat to get the hot hand at any point. He scored 11 goals and 36 points in his rookie campaign, and that was no mistake. If he gets back soon, he could get some reps in right before the time the Sharks will need him most.
4. Jonathan Quick, Los Angeles Kings
Sidelined since the start of the season, Quick’s return appears to still be a week or two away, but that puts him in line to be back in the Kings’ net by the time the final month of the season is upon us. That’s great news for Los Angeles, especially if the team can manage to sneak into the post-season. Goaltending can steal a series, and Quick has stood on his head in past playoff appearances. The hope has to be that he’s in game shape by the time he gets back, though.
If Kings fans, or anyone else for that matter, is wondering why Quick isn’t higher on this list, there’s an easy answer. As good as Quick may be, Peter Budaj has played pretty well over the course of the campaign. Quick will be an improvement, but it’s not going to be like going from a shooter tutor to a brick wall.
3. Darnell Nurse, Edmonton Oilers
The Oilers probably want to bolster their roster at the deadline as they get set for their first playoff appearance in a decade, but they might not have to do all that much to solve the depth problems on their blueline if Nurse comes back and plays like the top-four defender he’s capable of being. One of the bigger concerns facing Nurse has to be whether he’ll be in game shape or not. He hasn’t played since Dec. 1, and that’s a long time for a 22-year-old to be away from game action to expect him to come back and be effective immediately.
Nurse can be the perfect depth shut down guy once he’s back, though. He doesn’t need to play big minutes, but against a deep team, someone like Nurse could pay dividends late in the season and into the playoffs. As important as depth forwards are, having the depth defensemen to match up against a team that can roll four lines can be as crucial to post-season success.
2. Travis Hamonic, New York Islanders
Hamonic’s last game came in early January when the Islanders were in the midst of their struggles. The team has turned things around under interim coach Doug Weight in Hamonic’s absence, however. And while there’s a good chance some team in the hunt will improve their blueline in a big way with the acquisition of Kevin Shattenkirk at the deadline, the Islanders stand to get their own top-four defender back in Hamonic. That’s going to be a big boost for New York.
That said, this season hasn’t been a great one by Hamonic’s standards. Despite the fact he was scoring at a better rate that he had during the 2015-16 campaign, his ice time was down three minutes per game through the early part of this season. Weight might have a different plan for the defender, though. If Hamonic comes back and performs like the legitimate top-three defender he is, the Islanders stand to add a top-four defender to their blueline without giving up so much as a seventh-round pick.
1. Steven Stamkos, Tampa Bay Lightning
The Lightning have had an incredibly frustrating season and losing Stamkos as early as they did didn’t help one bit. By the 18th game of the season, the Bolts were without their captain for the foreseeable future, and he’s missed more than half the season with his knee injury. There’s still no definite return date for Stamkos, but he was given a four-to-six month timeline when he fell injured. That would indicate he could be back come the middle of next month or possibly just as the season closes. Things are looking positive right now, too. He recently practiced in full gear, per the Tampa Bay Times.
Stamkos’ game-breaking ability is something the Lightning have been missing for much of the season. While Nikita Kucherov and Jonathan Drouin have been contributing wonderfully this campaign, the Lightning have consistently had one of the league’s elite offenses over the past few seasons. This year, however, the Bolts rank 16th in goals for with 161. That’s not up to their usual standard, and Stamkos being sidelined hasn’t helped one bit.
The uncertainty surrounding Stamkos puts him at the top spot on this list with a caveat, however. He doesn’t help Tampa Bay near as much if the Lightning can’t somehow turn the tides late in the season and earn a spot in the playoffs. They’re only four points out with 23 games remaining, but it’s going to take some work and some favorable results around the league for the Bolts to sneak in. If the roster includes Stamkos, the likelihood of Tampa Bay making a late run go up drastically.
The Eastern Conference used to be the land of opportunity, but now it’s the West that looks ripe for the taking if a team can get hot at the right time.
There’s a term, “Group of Death,” that’s usually used in soccer to describe a particularly strong collection of teams that will have to battle each other in order to advance in a tournament. To translate that to NHL terms, it’d be like if, heading into the post-season, one single division boasted the league’s first-place team, defending Stanley Cup champions and a squad that had gone on a 16-game win streak during the regular season. You know, like the Metropolitan Division.
Only one team can emerge from the group and represent the Metropolitan in the Eastern Conference final, and right now the odds for the Eastern representative would have to favor whichever team escapes the NHL’s current powerhouse division. The Metropolitan teams have led the charge for much of the season with stacked lineups that are performing at the top of their game. That’s not to say the Atlantic Division teams stand no chance in the post-season, but rather that most of the favorites to represent the East — and, honestly, to win the Cup — are all in the Metropolitan.
That’s a change from the way things have been in recent years, however. Formerly, the Eastern Conference was the land of opportunity, almost entirely wide open with five or six teams who could be honest-to-goodness contenders. Heading into the post-season in 2015-16, for instance, the Penguins, Capitals, Lightning, Rangers and, to a lesser extent, Panthers were all considered teams with potential for a deep run.
In the West, however, years of dominance by a handful of teams has led to the conference boasting a few teams as contenders entering the post-season with a number of also-rans. From the 2009 post-season until this past season, the Blackhawks appeared in five Western Conference finals, the Kings in three and the Sharks in three. Those three teams account for more than half of the total appearances in the Western Conference final over the past eight campaigns, and the Kings and Blackhawks, especially, were the biggest road blocks en route to the Western Conference title for several years.
It would seem that’s starting to shift, though, and we could be in for a Western Conference that’s more wide open than we’ve seen in some time. The defending Western Conference champion Sharks look like a threat to go deep in the post-season again, without a doubt, and the Blackhawks are still contenders, but they’re not as faultless as they’ve been in the past. Each team has it’s pros and cons, giving to reason to believe it’ll be their year to take home the West title or a season in which they come up just that much short.
The Minnesota Wild, for instance, are the top team in the Western Conference, and the strength up and down the roster is near unquestionable. That includes the crease, especially, where Devan Dubnyk is turning in an outstanding season that is almost sure to end with him receiving the Vezina Trophy as the league’s top goaltender. The Wild also boast more depth than possibly any other team in the league and few teams will be able to roll four lines against Minnesota. In the same breath, though, that depth is necessary because the Wild lack that one, game-breaking star. Zach Parise has shown that ability, for sure, but he’s not in the same category as a Connor McDavid, Vladimir Tarasenko or Patrick Kane.
And when it comes to Kane, his Blackhawks have been on fire of late and he’s been no small part of that. Chicago is going to enter the post-season as the favorite for some simply because the team has been atop the league so often of late they seem a constant threat. You mix in the talented core group that has remained in tact and the goaltending the team gets from Corey Crawford, and the Blackhawks are a contender. But the depth can be questioned, and there are a handful of rookies who haven’t seen playoff action before.
Rounding out the top three in the Central Division is the St. Louis Blues, a team which most expected would be competing for a division title, not barely holding onto one of the three divisional playoff spots. The issue in St. Louis has been goaltending. The Blues have one of the West’s more prolific offenses, but their 172 goals against are the most of any team currently holding onto a playoff spot in the West. Things have been looking up under coach Mike Yeo, and the Blues will be very dangerous if goaltender Jake Allen gets hot.
Then there’s the Pacific Division, led by the aforementioned Sharks. The two wily veterans, Joe Thornton and Patrick Marleau, are still chugging along in San Jose, but the team has been led this season by an absolutely outstanding performance by Brent Burns. The defenseman is on pace to have one of the greatest offensive seasons by a blueliner we’ve seen in recent years. Captain Joe Pavelski has also cracked the 20-goal plateau once again, but the depth contributions have been sporadic. The Sharks really were hoping for more from Mikkel Boedker, too.
South of San Jose, the Ducks have stumbled of late under coach Randy Carlyle, but this is still a team with enough top-end talent that a close game can be taken over in an instant. Corey Perry and Ryan Getzlaf are still a remarkable one-two punch up front, and the depth on the back end is excellent. Cam Fowler is having a great year, and Hampus Lindholm and Sami Vatanen have been as steady as ever. The recent injury to John Gibson is worrisome, but if he’s only out for a short period of time, it shouldn’t hinder the Ducks down the stretch. Relying on Jonathan Bernier might lead to disaster, however.
And, of course, everyone is going to be paying close attention to the Oilers. For some, Edmonton will be the Pacific Division favorite solely because of the McDavid factor. His first full season has been a treat to watch and the Oilers have benefited big time from his league-leading point total. Edmonton would probably love a boost to their back end and maybe some bottom-six scoring punch, though. They’re top heavy right now, and if the Oilers match up against a defense that can slow down McDavid, that could result in an earlier exit than some are expecting.
Even in the wild card, the teams appear threatening. The Predators were early season favorites after their acquisition of P.K. Subban, and you’d still be hard done by to find a defense that is better, top to bottom, than that of Nashville. Trouble is the goaltending has been below average, which is the same issue that has plagued Calgary despite the Flames holding onto one of the wild-card spots. Short of acquiring Ben Bishop from the Lightning, there isn’t a quick fix for Calgary in goal, but they’re still competitive. And this is to say nothing yet of the Kings. Los Angeles is still well within striking distance of the post-season, and getting Jonathan Quick back and finding some scoring at the deadline could be a game-changer.
This might not be a one-off in the West, either. With the changeover that’s going on throughout the conference, from the Blackhawks’ in-house retooling to the Oilers’ resurgence and continued build around McDavid, there are more teams in the mix with a real, honest chance to represent the West in the final than we’ve seen in some time. That stands to continue for a few years until one team establishes Western Conference dominance. But until that happens, it’s going to make the playoff race and post-season battles all the more exciting to watch.
Back in 1995, the Quebec Nordiques unveiled a brand new logo and uniform designs, but, of course, they never got to wear them.
'Nordiques will have new look in 1996-97'
April 14, 1995 -- Vol. 48, No. 30
The Quebec Nordiques don’t have a new arena yet, but a new logo and colors are on the way.
When the Journal de Quebec published the Nordiques’ new colors March 30, the team had no choice but to confirm the makeover.
The team’s road jersey will be dark blue with a few lines of teal-like green color, black, white and silver. The crest has a large head of a husky dog with its teeth bared. They will sport their new colors in the 1996-97 and not next season because they failed to meet the NHL’s deadline for a logo change.
As for a new arena, there may be a solution to that problem and it has to do with gambling. The second-most powerful provincial politician in Quebec prefers a lottery to a casino as a way of raising public money to save the Nordiques.
That was one of the topics in a 90-minute discussion March 27 between Quebec’s deputy premier Bernard Landry and Marcel Aubut, the Nordiques’ president and part-owner.
Landry declined to meet with the media after the discussion. But Aubut told reporters of Landry’s leaning toward a lottery scheme.
Aubut has pressed all levels of government for help to keep the franchise in Quebec City. He has repeatedly stated the franchise needs a new venue with more seating and revenue-generating luxury boxes if it is to survive.
Photos via Sportslogos.net
Groups from Phoenix, Denver and Atlanta are reportedly interested in buying and relocating the club if it goes on the market. Aubut said Landry declared he is prepared to do anything to save the club.
“We’ve been received favorably but time is pressing and the agenda is tight.” Aubut said.
“The lottery is what Mr. Landry favors the most, but what he’s saying is he’s willing to do whatever must be done so the Nordiques remain”
Last January, Aubut set an April deadline for the Quebec government to decide whether it will build a new Colisee. The government said it might explore the possibility of a low-interest loan to the team, much as it did with baseball’s Montreal Expos.
When a consortium bought the Expos in 1991, the province lent $18 million toward the purchase.
The Nordiques responded to the loan possibility with a tersely worded statement in which they urged a new arena be built as soon as possible and the government absorb the team’s financial losses in the interim.
Aubut has said he expects the Nordiques to lose about $10 million this year and $12 million next season.
As we count down to the March 1 trade deadline, here are five of the teams that present the toughest buy-or-sell call.
We're now one week away from the trade deadline, which means the entire league is being divided into buyers and sellers. This year, there's far more of the former than the latter, so much so that it might throw the market into chaos, or maybe lead to a very quiet week.
Still, most teams know where they stand by now. If you're a Cup contender or desperate for a playoff spot, you buy. If you're already toast, then you look to the future and let the firesale begin.
But what about those teams that are stuck somewhere in between? Even this late in the season, there are still some teams that could make a good case for either side of the equation. Maybe they're not quite sure if they're still in the running, or maybe they can't decide if this is the right year to make a push. But either way, they've got a few days left to make up their minds.
As we count down until March 1, here are five of the teams that present the toughest buy-or-sell call.
Toronto Maple Leafs
The case for buying: One year into the Auston Matthews era, the Leafs have been better than most expected and are right in the mix for an Eastern Conference playoff spot – and a run at home-ice or even a division title isn't completely out of the question. The team has access to a ton of cap room and plenty of picks and prospects to work with.
And maybe more importantly, they have a three-year window while Matthews and Mitch Marner are on their rookie contracts. James van Riemsdyk's cheap deal runs for one more year after this one. William Nylander needs a new contract after next season. The time to strike could be soon.
The case for selling: "Soon" doesn't mean now. The Leafs have been patient during this rebuild, and waiting another year to really swing for the fences would be the smart play. And with a handful of rental options like Roman Polak and Matt Hunwick, collecting a few more future assets might be a smart way to prepare for what's to come.
Where they'll end up: You never know with Lou Lamoriello and his fortress of silence, but for now it sounds like they're not planning to do much.
The case for buying: After making the playoffs last year, the Flyers have taken a step back and are fading from the race. But this team is good enough to do some damage, as they showed earlier this year when they won nine straight and briefly moved into the mix with other elite teams in the Metro. Ron Hextall has been patient since taking over the GM's job, but this team hasn't won a playoff round since 2012 and Claude Giroux and Jakub Voracek are in the late stages of their prime. At some point, it's time to take a step forward.
The case for selling: Timing is everything, and this year's Metro Division is so stacked that taking a run at it seems foolish. Better to move rentals like Mark Streit and Michael Del Zotto (and maybe even Steve Mason) and regroup for next year.
Where they'll end up: Their next two games are against the Capitals and Penguins, if they lose those, Hextall likely folds his hand.
The case for buying: We've been talking about the Jets as the NHL's team of the future for years now, but that future never seems to arrive. The West is wide open this year, and the path out of the Central doesn't seem as daunting as it has been in recent years. Their biggest need is goaltending, and there could be some good ones available, even as short-term rentals. With the team on the edge of the playoff bubble, this could be the year to make a push.
The case for selling: This team is good enough to make the playoffs, but are they really a threat to do much damage once they're there? The franchise has been patiently building up a young talent base since returning to Winnipeg, and abandoning that approach now just to get swept in the first round could seem like a panic move.
Where they'll end up: History tells us that GM Kevin Cheveldayoff and the Jets won't do much at all, no team has been as reluctant to trade in recent years. This could be the year that changes, especially if a goaltender shakes free as a decent value buy. Then again, it feels like we've said that before.
The case for buying: They've been bad for five straight years. Some of those were strategic, granted, but that phase of the rebuild was supposed to end in 2015 and give way to progress. There's been some, but not as much as fans probably hoped, and they're on the verge of missing the playoffs yet again.
But they've been better since a rash of injuries torpedoed their start, and they've got assets to work with to plug some holes. And in an off-year for the Atlantic, a push into the playoffs isn't far-fetched.
Again, most teams don't want to load up at the deadline just to make the playoffs and go out early. But this isn't the same situation as a team like the Jets, who didn't have to endure hitting rock bottom like the Sabres did. In Buffalo's case you wonder if even a first-round exit wouldn't represent a worthwhile investment, if only to offer long-suffering fans some hope that things are moving in the right direction.
The case for selling: They're not winning it all this year, and the roster is still young. Sure, missing the playoffs again will be frustrating, but there's no need to rush. Trust the process, trust Jack Eichel and the young core, and most of all, trust Tim Murray. At least for one more year.
Where they'll end up: Murray might tinker here or there, but any big moves to improve now would also have to extend to next season and beyond.
Tampa Bay Lightning
The case for buying: They're the Lightning. They went to the Cup final in 2015, and to the conference final in 2016. Plenty of us picked them to win it all this year. They'll be facing a cap crunch soon and their window may be closing, but on paper this team is still good enough to win it all, especially if Steven Stamkos comes back by the playoffs.
So of course you're buying. This team can win the Stanley Cup. They're the Lightning.
The case for selling: They're also terrible.
I don't know why. You don't know why. I'm not sure Steve Yzerman knows why. But they just haven't clicked all year, and they remain outside the playoffs with multiple teams to pass. Better to accept that, recoup some assets for guys like Ben Bishop and Brian Boyle, and maybe even figure out a way to dump some deals with term. For whatever reason, this just isn't their year, so start setting the table for the next ones.
Where they'll end up: Yzerman's earned the benefit of the doubt over the years, so you figure he'll make the right call one way or another. The betting is with two more home games before the deadline, he waits as long as he can before throwing in the towel. But I have them in the "sell" column.
Sean McIndoe has been writing about the NHL since 2008; you may know him from Twitter as @downgoesbrown. His e-book, The 100 Greatest Players in NHL History, is available now. He appears weekly on TheHockeyNews.com.