by Lady Byng on Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:29 pm
Being old school, my tendency as is the tendency of just about everyone else is to build through the draft and that's all she wrote. At times over the years this has become an obsession, and you can see by the way the fans put so much priority in the NHL entry draft that this obsession is something we swear by. Given a good team, the value of the draft does not diminish rather it turns up the heat to make that astute draft pick in the later half of the first round. At no time would myself or anyone in this place advocate the trading of a first round draft pick. It does happen in real life, and when it happens you may see people trying desperately to justify the trading of the first round draft pick however if it were up to us that trade would never have happened.
Case in point, the Leafs trading two first round draft picks away in the Phil Kessel deal. It was best said by another person regarding the Phil Kessel deal that, and I quote, 'I like Phil Kessel as a player however I cannot justify such compensation for a player not named Crosby or Ovechkin. Unless Phil Kessel is considered to be of that class. Is Phil Kessel in the same class of the young elite such as Crosby, Ovechkin, Malkin, Kovalchuk? Somehow, I doubt anyone really believes that Phil Kessel is among the same class of the young elite as Crosby, Ovechkin, Malkin, Kovalchuk. Brian Burke is telling us he is. Brian Burke is telling us Phil Kessel is among the same class of the young elite as Crosby, Ovechkin, Malkin, Kovalchuk. Anyone who believes that will like the trade. Anyone who does not believe that will not like the trade.'
The key to that above comment was, 'Anyone who believes that will like the trade. Anyone who does not believe that will not like the trade.'
Another attempt at justifying the deal went as follows, 'The Leafs made the Phil Kessel deal based on the average projection for a first round draft pick. The NHL league average is just about 60% of all first round draft choices ever making the NHL and actually playing as much as a hundred games. It is a gamble worth taking. Phil Kessel is a tier-two elite player. The draft picks are not as only 60% of all first round draft choices ever make the NHL and actually play in a hundred NHL games.'
Given the choice, we would not have made the deal because under no circumstances can we justify the trading of a first round draft pick. Being old school - We build through the draft and that's all she wrote. To rely on free agency as the default choice of team building is just plain dumb. It's stupid, it's lazy and it's just not the NHL we know, or knew. It's not the NHL we know, or knew, and it's not the NHL we want to know. As it applies to the Montreal Canadiens, the Montreal Canadiens are just one of thirty. What one does justifies the rest if any of them have any degree of success under such team building. Like lemmings they will follow off the cliff of winning/now leaving the clean-up for the next generation. Is that any way to run a hockey team? Of course not. We know better. So do they. The difference is that their six figure salary depends on winning/now - Ours, does not, and that's all she wrote.