• Search
  • Teams & Specialty
  • \
    version-4.2.58-cefe831e1
    The Hockey News logo
    Powered by Roundtable
    Mlarkin1@THNews profile image
    Matt Larkin
    Apr 22, 2016
    Partner
    Mlarkin1@The Hockey News

    Was Chicago play-by-play man Pat Foley justified in slamming the NHL for late start times for playoff games? Or is he wrong?

    Angry TV announcer versus NHL: who's right in debate over crazy-late start times?Angry TV announcer versus NHL: who's right in debate over crazy-late start times?

    Hockey fans living in the central time zone and anywhere east of there may one day remember spring of 2016 as The Red-Eye Playoffs. The need to stagger games has produced some late start times, and we're not just talking the usual Pacific Division fare that starts at 10:30 p.m. ET and only stops diehard East Coasters from going to bed.

    This year's post-season has produced the oddity of Central-time games being treated like West Coast telecasts. Game 5 of the Chicago Blackhawks and St. Louis Blues' Central Division semifinal Thursday started at 8:42 p.m. central and 9:42 p.m. eastern for the third time in the series. The wildly entertaining game was too good to turn off, so it sucked a lot of sleep from a lot of people. Among that group: Chicago Blackhawks play-by-play personality Pat Foley. He decided he was fed up with the scheduling and unleashed this rant, mid-broadcast, before a commercial break cut him off:

    [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RajIoBoa__o[/embed]

    The local CSN Chicago feed was broadcast on NBCSN as well, and analyst Mike Milbury decided to quickly fire back at Foley, essentially telling him it was past his bedtime:

    For everyone who missed it, here are Milbury's comments directed at Pat Foley on the late start times. #StanleyCuppic.twitter.com/qZiAqeWzKO

    — One Goal. One Team. (@onegoal_oneteam) April 22, 2016

    In Foley's defense, Milbury misunderstood him. He attacked Foley as if Foley was whining that he had to stay up late. Foley specifically singled out the fans as the top priority. He was speaking first and foremost on their behalf.

    That doesn't make Foley right, however. The scheduling was clearly an effort to stagger start times and maximize continent-wide viewers' ability to catch at least some of every game. Starting the Hawks-Blues tilt at a more typical 8:00 p.m. ET/7:00 p.m. CT would've overlapped that game with at least two periods of the 7:00 ET starts, the Penguins/Rangers and Red Wings/Lightning tilts, not to mention the Ducks and Predators' 8:00 p.m. ET start. It would've guaranteed a TV collision between all four games. The 9:42 ET start created breathing room.

    NHL commissioner Gary Bettman addressed Foley's rant Friday in New York at an annual meeting with the Associate Press sports editors. As the Chicago Tribune's Joe Knowles reports, Bettman said Foley "didn't have his facts straight" and that "Clubs are fine with the start times, and you can ask the Blackhawks."

    Bettman also explained that the league's relatively new expanded national TV audience necessitates staggering the start times to accommodate viewers. He added that Hawks president John McDonough called him Friday and expressed displeasure with Foley's comments.

    So where do the rest of us fall in the debate? The opinion on this end is, hey, growing the game to its most prosperous era of American TV viewership means making certain sacrifices. Coverage can't be tailored to each individual market. It has to serve the greater good. Is an 8:42 CT start time ideal? Obviously not. But this is the playoffs, and we'll have fewer scheduling problems with every passing round as the field of teams dwindles.

    To be frank: the attitude I take is to embrace the grind of the playoffs and enjoy the camaraderie it builds. The players, coaches, broadcasters, fans and writers like us – we're all in this together. We'll all sleep a bit less until the playoffs end. But there's something fun about that. It's a shared experience.

    Matt Larkin is a writer and editor at The Hockey News and a regular contributor to the thn.com Post-To-Post blog. For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, subscribe to The Hockey News magazine. Follow Matt Larkin on Twitter at @THNMattLarkin

    Comments
    No comments yetThere are no comments available for this post
    TonyFerrari@THNews profile image
    Ferrari
    jimparsons@THNew profile image
    Parsons
    TheHockeyNewsRTB@THNews profile image
    Hockey
    jaketye@RTBIO profile image
    Tye
    Michael_Traikos@THN profile image
    Traikos
    sammi@THN profile image
    Silber
    CarolSchram@THNews profile image
    Schram
    Avry@TheHN profile image
    Lewis-McDougall
    Wenonah@THNews profile image
    Carchidi
    AndreLeal@THNews profile image
    Leal
    ByJonBailey@THNews profile image
    Bailey
    Ken_Campbell27@THNews profile image
    Campbell
    CruikshankEric@THNews profile image
    Cruikshank
    JonathanTovell@TheHN profile image
    Tovell
    MikeInBuffalo@THNew profile image
    Augello
    AnthonyFava19@THNews profile image
    Fava
    LyleRichardson@THNews profile image
    Richardson
    Rmastey@THNew profile image
    Mastey
    JulianGaudio@THNew profile image
    Gaudio
    RyanKennedy@THNews profile image
    Kennedy
    JoeyMacHockey@THNews profile image
    McDonald
    BrianDessart@THNews profile image
    T.
    Graeme@Round profile image
    Graeme
    JasonChen@THNew profile image
    Chen
    AdamProteau@TheHN profile image
    Proteau

    The Hockey News Community
     profile image
    Create new post