• Print

Rumor Roundup: Shark leak

Patrick Marleau and Evgeni Nabokov are scheduled to be unrestricted free agents this summer. (Photo by Don Smith/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Patrick Marleau and Evgeni Nabokov are scheduled to be unrestricted free agents this summer. (Photo by Don Smith/NHLI via Getty Images)

Less than 24 hours after the San Jose Sharks were swept by the Chicago Blackhawks, speculation over their potential off-season moves began.

Most of the talk centered around goaltender Evgeni Nabokov and forward Patrick Marleau, both of whom are eligible for unrestricted free agency July 1.

Nabokov, who earned $5.4 million this season, would be the best available goalie in this year’s free agent market, while Marleau is coming off a career-best, 44-goal season having made $6.3 million in 2009-10.

It’s believed the Sharks might part ways with Nabokov and seek a more affordable goaltender via free agency or trade. Marleau’s strong chemistry with Joe Thornton and Dany Heatley, on the other hand, certainly makes a case for his retention, but with nearly $15 million tied up in Thornton and Heatley it could prove too costly.

Although the Sharks have less than $37 million committed to 12 players for next season, they must also re-sign restricted free agents Joe Pavelski (who earned $1.6 million last season) and Devin Setoguchi ($1.2 million).

Both will likely at least double their salary next season – Pavelski could possibly triple his – making it almost impossible to spend big money to retain Nabokov and Marleau.

It’s also possible coach Todd McLellan and GM Doug Wilson will face scrutiny, although the San Jose Mercury News suggests their record over the past two seasons should make them “fireproof.”

Don’t, however, expect any snap decisions or sudden moves. CEO Greg Jamison told the Mercury News it’ll be “a few days” before team executives meet to discuss the club’s future.

Even though the Sharks made progress this season by advancing to the conference final for only the second time in franchise history, the perception remains this is a club spinning its wheels and due for a significant shakeup.

Last summer, Wilson swung a blockbuster deal with the Ottawa Senators for Heatley, so it’s possible he’ll try to shake things up again.

Reports out of Russia last week claimed New Jersey Devils winger and pending UFA Ilya Kovalchuk had agreed to a one-year contract with St. Petersburg of the Kontinental League.

The New York Post, however, reported an informed source dismissed this story, although signing with a KHL club is clearly an option for Kovalchuk.

Kovalchuk is also reportedly interested in staying on with the Devils, but re-signing him to a long-term deal could make it difficult to retain Zach Parise, who’ll be seeking a new contract next summer.

It’s been suggested the Devils would have to choose between Kovalchuk and Parise, but if it came to that they’d likely choose the latter. Parise was drafted by the Devils and came up through their system, not to mention he would probably be considerably cheaper to keep around.

• The Ottawa Sun reported defenseman Anton Volchenkov has put his Ottawa home up for sale, signaling his likely departure via free agency in July.

Senators GM Bryan Murray would like to re-sign Volchenkov, but the Russian blueliner is believed to be seeking $5 million per season, which places him out of the Senators’ price range.

The Sun report also claimed the Washington Capitals are seeking a shot-blocking, shutdown defenseman and are prepared to make an offer for Volchenkov. The Caps could have team captain Alex Ovechkin contact his fellow countryman in hopes of convincing Volchenkov to come to Washington.

If the Capitals, considered a Cup contender next season, are interested in Volchenkov, a phone call from Ovechkin probably won’t be necessary to sway him, although signing Volchenkov for $5 million per season could make it difficult for the Caps to re-sign all their key free agents.

• Staying with the Senators, don’t expect them to move first-line center Jason Spezza. The Sun reported there’s “no market” for the 26-year-old due to his expensive contract and style of play.

Murray probably has no interest in shopping Spezza despite the grumblings of some disgruntled Senators fans who’ve made the playmaker the scapegoat for the club’s early exit from this year’s playoffs.

As Sportsnet analyst Doug MacLean told the newspaper, quality first-line centers like Spezza are almost impossible to find and just as difficult to replace.

Rumor Roundup appears Mondays and Thursdays only on thehockeynews.com. Lyle Richardson has been an NHL commentator since 1998 on his website, spectorshockey.net, and is a contributing writer for Foxsports.com and Eishockey Magazine.

COMMENTS (11)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


irvine Posted
(2010-05-31 21:45:40)

profile picture


@TomCotner: Oh, I follow what you are saying. But, I don't agree with it. First off, Greiss is not ready to be a #1 NHL Goaltender. Letting Nabokov walk, they WILL sign a new goaltender to be their #1 via Free Agency. Greiss will not takeover. Marleau is not that old, at 29 of years of age. In fact, he's just around (perhaps latter stages) of his prime. And, just finished his best goal and point totals of his career. Yes, his price is steep, but he's certainly a keeper if you can. Thornton is not a leader, and he is soft. But he has great vision and can make a play out of nothing, by finding the open man at any time. The Bruins trading him, has nothing to do with San Jose. Since, San Jose acquired him. Obviously they felt different than Boston. Also, Joe's return is not worth moving him. His softness and lack of leadership, @ the price he costs, teams won't give up a ton for him. He's worth more staying, and producing 80-90 assists per year, than he is going to give you in return. So, no. You don't move him out. DO YA FOLLOW?
    0



tomcotner Posted
(2010-05-29 16:24:36)

profile picture


IRVINE: SOME VALID POINTS, I'll give ya that. And again, the SHARKS might not make any changes if there wasn't a salary cap, and as an update,. I noticed that it was announced that next season would enjoy an increase as opposed to the dreaded decrease which many have thought was going to be a given. Because there IS a cap, my point is that NABOKOV is expenable due to his age, salary, and the fact that GREISS is primed and ready to take command. Similar for MARLEAU due to age and 09/10 salary. HEATLEY would be a keeper, plain and simple and THORTON is signed, but if there was a trade partner, and I'm DOUG WILSON, JUMBO JOE would be an ouster for the best that I could get in return. There IS a reason why the BRUINS traded him; DO YA FOLLOW ???
    0



irvine Posted
(2010-05-27 02:05:07)

profile picture


@TomCotner: Why would San Jose, who are progressing to a Stanley Cup Final berth, slowly but surely, move Thornton AND Marleau? Not to mention, their #1 Goaltender. They may have to move one of Marleau or Nabokov (Perhaps both), but why Thornton too? Thornton may be a little soft at times, but he is the #1 set-up man in the NHL, bar none. Nicklas Backstrom, Henrik Sedin (when with Daniel), Marc Savard & Jason Spezza are approaching him, but he still leads the way. Now with a legit 50 Goal Scorer in Heatley, sounds like success.
    0



tomcotner Posted
(2010-05-26 14:51:29)

profile picture


IN THIS DAY AND AGE OF THE DREADED SALARY CAP, although I am NOT a SHARK fan, WOOPS, I guess this would be a good time to admit that I am a west coast transplanted BLACKHAWK FAN from the 60's. That said, I would assess that the SHARKS should let go of NABOKHOV, MARLEAU, THORNTON, among others to retool with a capable class and at a lesser wage scale. 1st off, the times that I saw their backup goalie, THOMAS GREISS play, he sure as heck looked more than capable to me. Course, I always used to say that about their previous backup, who I always thought was a pretty darn good goalie, UNTIL HE GOT TRADED TO TORONTO !!! Then ANAHEIM, AND CALGARY, and he still looks like crap !!! In this day and age of the salary cap, 1 or 2 OLDSTERS; and the rest NEWBY'S !!!
    0



tomcotner Posted
(2010-05-26 14:42:08)

profile picture


test
    0



flon13 Posted
(2010-05-26 11:46:09)

profile picture


What are you talking about, Spezza's soft and a floater. He's the poor man's version of Joe Thornton and we all know how Joe plays in big games.
    0



aoystreck Posted
(2010-05-25 20:50:22)



the rumblings among fans to run Spezza out of town are up there with the calls to trade Yzerman back in the day as far as fan stupidity goes. The guy topped 90pts more than once, and had such a great finish to this season that he almost overcame his awful, injury-plagued start to reach a point-a-game pace for the year. He forged great chemistry with Peter Regin, who now figures to be a cornerstone going forward, and has also played well with Michalek. He had a lot of reasons for his lame start: the distraction of being newly married over the summer, the uncertaintly of playing without his usual linemate and living up to the pressure of being "the guy", the self-imposed pressure of trying to impress the Olympic scouts, the pressure to bounce back from a disappointing previous season, and a nagging back injury that only disappeared when he was forced to miss 6 weeks with a knee injury. Once those excuses melted away, his production exploded. The "high risk" aspect has disappeared almost completely from his game in the past 2 years. He's frustrating only when he tries doing it all himself, which for some reason seems to be what the fans expect him to do. When he's playing HIS GAME, he's up there with Thornton and Savard among the best set-up men in the league, AND has 40-goal potential. Unless San Jose comes calling with a deal to reunite Spezza with Heatley for Thornton straight up, Murray shouldn't even consider trading him
    3



pokecheck Posted
(2010-05-25 18:19:27)



I think there are teams that'd take Spezza off Ottawa's hands. Not sure why they would want that cap space, Ottawa isn't a destination for top players want to sign with, especially if Spezza is gone. But I think Atlanta or Edmonton would love a chance to get a guy like Spezza locked down in a contract, Toronto would probably love him but Murray wouldn't trade him within division. Florida, Minnesota, Phoenix, Nashville might take him depending on their spending budgets. I think if you can trade Gomez you can trade Spezza.
    2



pensphanatic Posted
(2010-05-25 16:56:57)



If it takes $5M to re-sign Volchenkov, I sit back and let some other GM go ahead and sign that contract.
    2



kythan Posted
(2010-05-25 14:23:59)



I don't get all the Spezza hate, he can't do it alone. He's young, talented, and clicks with just about anyone they put on a line with him. He's one of the only pieces on that team I think they should keep long term.
    1




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
This Week - Subscribe Now

What do you think of the two-year, $5.5-million contract Carey Price signed with the Canadiens?





"I think we'll be a real nice surprise this year. Some people, you know, are hard on us...as far as the end of the year and not being happy at how things went. It's a fun time of year. You read all the different things - what some people like or are excited for. Some people pick certain teams to win. But none of that really matters. It's all proving it on the ice. Other years, we've been picked to do this and that. That's part of the fun at this time of the year, but I can't wait to get back playing."

- Flames captain Jarome Iginla on The Hockey News' prediction they will finish 8th in the Western Conference this season.

Our Partners