• Print

Rumor Roundup: Will Malkin move?

Evgeni Malkin had 11 points in 13 playoff games this spring. (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Evgeni Malkin had 11 points in 13 playoff games this spring. (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

In the wake of the Pittsburgh Penguins and Boston Bruins being eliminated from the 2010 Stanley Cup playoffs a few pundits have proposed the two clubs rid themselves of some expensive talent to free-up necessary cap space to bolster their overall depth.

As discussed last week on THN.com, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review and Edmonton Journal suggested the Penguins entertain offers for superstar center Evgeni Malkin, while the Boston Globe offered up the possibility of the Bruins dealing away 2009 Vezina winner Tim Thomas.

It’s understandable why the notion of shopping Malkin has been floated. The Penguins lack quality scoring-wingers, they’re probably going to lose puckmoving defenseman Sergei Gonchar to free agency and with roughly $11 million in available cap space, they lack the money to address those issues this summer.

If the Penguins decide to ship out Malkin they’re unlikely to get the return of a “top line winger, a top-pairing defenseman, two roster players and either two top prospects or two first round picks” as suggested by the Tribune-Review. As great as Malkin is and will continue to be, no NHL team will gut its roster to land him.

A more realistic scenario would be peddling him for a couple of scoring wingers, as suggested by the Journal when it proposed a dream trade involving Oilers wingers Ales Hemsky, Dustin Penner and possibly Andrew Cogliano.

If Penguins GM Ray Shero were to shop Malkin, he’d undoubtedly get plenty of interest, but it remains to be seen if he’s willing to make such a drastic move.

Shero has limited cap space this summer to address his roster needs, but he’s not under pressure to move Malkin or any of his other big-ticket players.

Perhaps the biggest issue facing Shero is finding a replacement for Gonchar, who’s an unrestricted free agent seeking a multi-year deal.

Shero cannot afford to re-sign Gonchar for the same cap hit of $5 million per season he earned on his current contract and would be leery of committing more than two years to a 36-year-old player, because if Gonchar were to retire before the end of his contract it would still count against the Penguins’ cap due to the “over-35” rule in the CBA. 

Given his cap constraints Shero won’t be able to afford a comparable replacement for Gonchar unless the GM clears considerable cap space by moving one of his core players. He’ll more likely look to Kris Letang to try and fill Gonchar’s shoes next season.

• The Boston Globe’s Kevin Paul Dupont went so far as to propose shipping Thomas to the Chicago Blackhawks in exchange for defenseman Brian Campbell, perhaps at the upcoming June draft.

Too many factors, however, work against that deal. Thomas and Campbell have no-movement clauses, the Blackhawks would have to find a way to shed Cristobal Huet’s big contract, plus they’re likely pleased enough with Antti Niemi that they’ll have no reason to take on another goalie with a big salary, even one with a Vezina on his resume like Thomas. 

Related Links

More importantly, Campbell’s $7.142 million per season contract would not only add another $2 million to the Bruins salary cap (Thomas’ cap hit is $5 million per season for three more years) it would also eat up valuable cap space for another six years, handcuffing any attempt to re-sign Zdeno Chara or Patrice Bergeron, who’ll be eligible for UFA status in 2011.

It’s not unreasonable to suggest the Bruins could peddle Thomas, but if they do it’ll be to shed salary to free up room for Chara and Bergeron plus leave room to try and bolster their depth this summer.

• Vancouver Canucks GM Mike Gillis is expected to make changes to his roster this summer, but will have limited means to do so.

The Vancouver Sun’s Elliott Pap reports Gillis needs a backup goaltender, a couple of defensemen and at least four more forwards, but with only about $10 million of salary cap space there won’t be enough to address all those needs.

Pap believes a considerable chunk of that space could be spent on finding a reliable shutdown defenseman to replace the concussed Willie Mitchell, plus it will likely cost Gillis up to $2.5 million per season to re-sign left winger Mason Raymond.

It’s possible, however, the Canucks will go over the cap during the summer and try to shed salary before the start of the season.

Assistant GM Laurence Gilman seemed to suggest that possibility to the Vancouver Province’s Jim Jamieson when he pointed out teams are allowed to spend up to 10 percent over the cap in the off-season, provided they’re under the cap by the start of next season.

Gillis isn’t afraid to make bold off-season moves so it’s possible he’ll get into the bidding for either Ottawa’s Anton Volchenkov or Nashville’s Dan Hamhuis and shed necessary salary elsewhere once he’s got one of them under contract.

Meanwhile, pending UFA Kyle Wellwood hopes to return with the Canucks, but given his inconsistent play and the possibility prospect Cody Hodgson could move into the third line center spot next season, Wellwood may have to find a new home.

Restricted free agent defenseman Shane O’Brien has arbitration rights this summer, but indicated he’s not willing to go that route, confessing to the Vancouver Sun the team’s management probably has “a lot of material they could use against me so it probably wouldn’t work too well.”

O’Brien was referring to his ongoing battle with weight and his week-long suspension late in the season after being late for a practice.

Rumor Roundup appears Mondays and Thursdays only on thehockeynews.com. Lyle Richardson has been an NHL commentator since 1998 on his website, spectorshockey.net, and is a contributing writer for Foxsports.com and Eishockey Magazine.

COMMENTS (18)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


kythan Posted
(2010-05-20 11:05:17)



Staal could be a point per game center potting about 30 goals a year if he was getting second line minutes, so Pitt wouldn't need another center, Kopitar, Savard, those guys are great but they put Pitt in the same position, no scoring coming in off of the wings. Eventually, Staal will get sick of being pigeon holed into a checking center, he'll go some where else eventually. Pitt doesn't HAVE to make a move, but they should. Montreal showed people how to control the Pens attack, so they will have to switch it up at some point or start losing games again. Right now, Philly is beating the tar out of the Habs because shots are coming in from all over the place, not just the center of the ice. Plus, there are more people shooting the puck, maybe they are not as high of a caliber of player as Malkin or Crosby, but they are putting pucks past this once "unbeatable" goalie. I'm thinking that Malkin for Sharp and Versteeg would be solid, maybe toss in a second rounder or two, and the Hawks have a great 1,2 at center, the Pens remain strong at that position plus add some scoring at the wings. Malkin to Columbus just wouldn't fly. Filatov, is not a proven commodity, he's not Pat Sharp who has consistantly netted 25 plus goals, or Alex Frolov with his consistant 30 plus. Maybe he'll be great, but aside from Rick Nash, I don't think Columbus has drafted that well.
    0



phoenixzen Posted
(2010-05-20 01:53:44)



You could get more out of the Kings for Malkin, but it's an interesting thought. As for Malkin for Savard, honestly? The whole point in trading Malkin would be to obtain a scoring winger. They already have Staal who can fill in as the second line center. Besides, Malkin isn't a second line player. He will eventually get traded so he can show what he brings to the game by being the go-to-guy.
    0



lamucks Posted
(2010-05-19 23:53:07)

profile picture


I think its a little silly that THN is stirring the pot on trading Malkin, but I guess thats the point of sports writing. How about this: Malkin to the Kings for Kopitar and a couple of picks or pick & a prospect. Kings get a better version of Kopitar, Pens get a lesser version of Malkin that they could put on the wing. But the main thing is your still getting a point per game player with rising potential for about 3million less. which could be used to get help in other areas. The penguins should really work on the shut down defensive game by replenishing the guys they lost last year. I always felt like a goal prevented is the same as a goal scored.
    0



yogi29035 Posted
(2010-05-19 21:57:19)

profile picture


Malkin for Savard and Wideman is not stupid- let's think it through. OK... Savard replaces Malkin and Wideman replaces Gonchar- that's 9m instead of 14m in salary. On July 1 Pitts takes their 5m and go shopping for the winger/finisher they need, eh?
    -1



chris_k Posted
(2010-05-19 18:45:41)

profile picture


A Malkin deal for Savard would be stupid. Pittsburgh needs a top finisher, not another playmaker.
    1



timp78 Posted
(2010-05-19 18:19:56)

profile picture


Just one year removed from a Stanley Cup and everybody has Ray Shero tearing apart the Penguins. Come on!
    0



kythan Posted
(2010-05-19 11:58:20)



Yeah, you can't even pull those trades off on NHL 2010, the GM's laugh at you, then hang up the phone. Which is pretty realistic if you ask me. The Savard scenario doesn't sit well with me. Pitt already has arguably the games two best scoring centers, Savard is a great player, but he is more of a passer, who on Pitt could he pass too? It would be the same scenario they have now, three great centers, and no wingers. How about the one of the Kings young goalies (Fluery is not that great IMO), Frolov, and a couple draft picks?
    1



marmoraflash Posted
(2010-05-19 08:40:23)

profile picture


So here on this board we have a brilliant example of opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of intelligence of comments. Yogi presents one of the most lucid, sensible suggestions I've ever seen on these boards. Savard, Wideman and the Bruins' first rounders this year and next for Malkin is a terrific idea. It makes sense for both teams and could actually work. Then there is jardy with his little fantasy scenario. Jardy, you should at least put a little thought into a trade idea before you post it. Why would the Canucks trade Schneider, Raymond and a first-rounder for Iginla? He has been a great player, but he's aging and it's not clear he is still an elite goal-scorer. But the really crazy part is your Flames/Flyers trade idea. Kiprusoff, who you admit is aging, for Carter, Giroux and a first-rounder. So, a goalie who could continue the Flyers decades-long troubles in net as he winds down the last few years of his career for one of the league's top young scoring centres, an elite prospect and a valuable pick? The Flyers wouldn't give up Carter for Kiprusoff, let alone throw in the rest of the package you suggest. Get a grip, please.
    0



jardyb10 Posted
(2010-05-19 05:58:40)



I recently dreamed upa perfect situation, as a hardcore Jarome Iginla fan. It starts like this; Iggy gets dealt to Vancouver for something like Cory Schneider, Mason Raymond, and 1st rounder, at the very least. This gives them a a potentially #1 goalie, a good forward, and, um... a draft pick. Vancouver gets a very important piece to their Cup puzzle, and really only need some defencemen to get er done. From there, since Flames now have a potential #1 goalie and with Kipper getting old, they should turn around and deal Kipper to perhaps the Flyers, for Jeff Carter, Claude Giroux, and a 1st rounder. More scoring, more depth, another draft pick. Calgary remains competitive, both long and short term, Iggy gets a Cup, Philly gets a goalie. Win-win-win.
    -2



kythan Posted
(2010-05-18 23:24:18)



The Pens need a more balanced attack, they need wingers. Malkin is an incredible forward who dozens of GM's would drool over. The problem is you cannot trade a fellow like Malkin and expect the same sort of high scoring player in return. Whoever the Pens got, would probably be no where near as good as Malkin. On the other hand, Staal can be a second line center. He could probably be the top guy on a good many teams. He reminds me of Keith Primeau just before he went to Hartford. Too good for the third line, and will one day itch to be a top tier forward. Chicago has a good number of wingers, some they could move (Sharp, Versteeg, Ladd). If the Pens were to land say Sharp and Versteeg, they would have two solid wingers, and some more depth on the team; i.e. more than two guys potting pucks. I agree though, that Crosby's lack of chemestry with wingers is confusing. He has always seemed to be (up until this year) a pass first forward. He had Sykora who was a solid winger at one point and Satan who led Buffallo in scoring for the better part of a decade, neither of those guys clicked with him. Who knows though, maybe Kovalchuk really wants to win, and he'll do like Kariya and Seleane did that year in Colorado. Sign for a league minimum contract, and win it all with one of the best young teams in Hockey.
    0




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
This Week - Subscribe Now

What do you think of the two-year, $5.5-million contract Carey Price signed with the Canadiens?





"I think we'll be a real nice surprise this year. Some people, you know, are hard on us...as far as the end of the year and not being happy at how things went. It's a fun time of year. You read all the different things - what some people like or are excited for. Some people pick certain teams to win. But none of that really matters. It's all proving it on the ice. Other years, we've been picked to do this and that. That's part of the fun at this time of the year, but I can't wait to get back playing."

- Flames captain Jarome Iginla on The Hockey News' prediction they will finish 8th in the Western Conference this season.

Our Partners