• Print

THN.com Blog: Is Brent Sutter the problem in Calgary?

After losing in the first round twice with New Jersey, Brent Sutter now leads the Calgary Flames who have lost seven in a row and risk missing the playoffs altogether. (Photo by Gerry Thomas/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

After losing in the first round twice with New Jersey, Brent Sutter now leads the Calgary Flames who have lost seven in a row and risk missing the playoffs altogether. (Photo by Gerry Thomas/NHLI via Getty Images)

When the Calgary Flames retooled for this season, the addition of defenseman Jay Bouwmeester was no doubt a marquee move, but so was the hiring of Brent Sutter to coach the team.

Sutter, after all, is Alberta royalty thanks to his family’s success in developing NHL talent based often on grit and hard work. He won Stanley Cups as a player with the dynasty New York Islanders and coached major junior back home in Alberta.

As bench boss and owner of the Western League’s Red Deer Rebels, Sutter won the 2001 Memorial Cup within just a year of taking over and when he finally left to helm the NHL’s New Jersey Devils in 2007, he had graduated a trail of elite pro talent: Cam Ward, Dion Phaneuf and Martin Erat all played for the Rebels during those halcyon days. Sutter also coached Canada to world junior gold in 2005 and 2006.

Then the success stopped.

Taking over a New Jersey team largely comprised of the same players that are viciously kicking down nearly every opponent this year, Sutter failed to guide the team out of the first round of the playoffs in his two years under the employment of GM Lou Lamoriello.

This season, back in the heartland, the Calgary Flames are going backwards – and fast – under the irascible coach. In fact, it’s no guarantee the Flames will even make the playoffs, let alone face the indignity of once again bowing out in seven games or less.

With top names such as Jarome Iginla, Olli Jokinen, Miikka Kiprusoff, Robyn Regehr, Phaneuf and Bouwmeester at his disposal (not to mention some nice secondary pieces in Rene Bourque and Curtis Glencross), it seems utterly bizarre Sutter would be unable to coax wins out of the talent he has in that dressing room.

But here we are.

Sutter has been vocally upset with his team’s performance in the local press, but the Flames still aren’t bringing it every night. Is it possible Sutter’s abrasive nose-always-on-the-grindstone coaching style only works in junior?

This isn’t even meant as a slam – plenty of high-profile coaches are better with youngsters than they are with seasoned vets. Rick Pitino did huge things at Providence College and the University of Kentucky basketball programs, but crashed out of the NBA when he was given the keys to the Boston Celtics. Likewise, Nick Saban was a college football guru with Louisiana State, but he couldn’t make hay with the NFL’s Miami Dolphins. Saban, of course, just won a national championship with the University of Alabama.

Related Links

Coaching major junior is just different from the NHL. You have players for a maximum of five seasons and help develop them from raw, lanky teens into beastly young men. In the meantime, you teach them how to be professionals both on and off the ice.

As a player, you’re better to listen to your coach no matter how tough he is on you, because you have zero leverage when it comes to getting traded out of there and you’ve already deep-sixed your NCAA eligibility by suiting up in major junior.

Under those circumstances, Sutter got the best out of his charges and players such as Colby Armstrong still refer to the lessons they learned back in Red Deer.

But maybe Calgary’s players aren’t hearing the message. Yeah, it’s rough to blame the coach when there are 23 other guys more directly responsible for the on-ice results, but this is the pros and only one thing should matter in Calgary right now – getting back into a top-eight spot in the conference and winning the franchise’s first playoff series since before the lockout.

In the pros, post-season wins are all that matter.

Ryan Kennedy is a writer and copy editor for The Hockey News magazine, the co-author of the book Hockey's Young Guns and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Monday and Wednesday, his column - The Straight Edge - every Friday, and his prospect feature, The Hot List appears Tuesdays. 

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

Blackberry

COMMENTS (10)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


madsprite18 Posted
(2010-01-28 10:40:14)



When Darryl Sutter led the Flames to the SC finals in '04, everyone heralded him as the patron saint of Alberta - we had faced a serious playoff drought for years. In general, it's easy to rap my head around the defence-first style - I've seen it work in other great hockey cities, and we've had the right mix of players to make it successful. But what happened? Darryl step down as coach. Playfair was the worst - he tried to promote Calgary's toughness and they ended up taking tons of stupid penalties. He made the Flames look like a bunch of goons. Then, we get Keenan - someone known for being successful, but equally well known for being too rigid and explosive. Well, we didn't actually see that explosive sidfe of him. Maybe if we had, then the players might have played with more heart and discipline. Instead, there was little or no discipline for two years and that's a significant amount of time when you're bringing up young players like Boyd and Moss and expecting them to adopt the sywstem and develop into NHL caliber players. So now we have Brent Sutter. I was very excited when Darryl brought him in. It seemed liek it was just what the doctor ordered and for the first two months of the season, we got big results - starting with an awesome power play (that now sucks wind), great defence, and stellar goaltending. I'm not sure what exactly happened between the end of November and now to spin the Flames so far out of control, but it really makes me sick as a fan to think that they've turned into the team everyone thought Colorado would be - dismal. Yes - they're still getting great goaltending, but something needs to be done to right this ship. Jokinen is getting tons of shots on net. Someone needs to work with him on his accuracy! Iginla can't continue to carry the team. He's a great player, but he's no where near his elite days. There's no shame in it - everyone ages. There are times when I think that Phaneuf is just a cement head. Sure, he delivers bone-crushing body checks and his slap shot can make or break a power play, but he takes idiotic, ill-time penalties. He's certainly no second-coming of Al MacInnes...not even close. And the farm in Abbottsford...for having all this well-drafted defence, the team isn't even in the middle of the pack for the AHL. I'd bet that has something to do with Playfair being behind the bench and not having a clue as to how to earn your players respect and ellicit positive results. For right now, the future looks bleak if nothing changes with the system.
    0



kobracom77 Posted
(2010-01-27 20:21:59)



I think the BIGGEST issue in cow town, is the G.M. How many years are the owners going to let the Sutter's run the ship. I bet as soon as thet adress that problem, things will admediatly start to look up. Look at the difference Mike Gilles has made for Vancouver. The ONLY reason we are not sitting up in the top three of the league, is because of injuries. We did have that horrid 8 game losing streak last season though. Sutter is doing NOTHING to help their future either. He should have never traded Cammie or Lombardi. Let alone, Lombardi, Prust, AND a first rounder. WOW, what a trade!!! Then to have to pick up Prust again. Honestly speaking, I despise the Flames more than any other team in the NHL. But I do feel bad for them right now, as much as I despise them, They are still a Canadian team. I really dont want the Flames to change anything, because it helps my team out. I am just hoping they dont realize what they need to do.
    0



markrm16 Posted
(2010-01-27 15:16:24)

profile picture


Replacing Kobasew, Lombardi, Cammalleri, Huselius, Tanguay, Aucoin and even Bertuzzi with a declining forward (Jokinen), an insanely pricey defensive defenceman (Bouwmeester), and several 3rd liners (Glencross and Dawes), plus having drafted only one offensive forward in years (Backlund) doesn't strike me as a good recipe for goal-scoring. The only good move made by the Flames was signing Bourque. You know there's trouble when Iggy's producing pre-lockout numbers. Ouch.
    1



sundowning Posted
(2010-01-27 15:01:58)



Dude, Sutter is the problem, his constant whinning to the media as well, and rape face jokinen is just as big a concern the guy is terrible on a team that expects him to lead in scoring
    1



brian_kemp Posted
(2010-01-27 12:40:50)

profile picture


A few thoughts on the Sutter boys and what they've done. First, I'd wait until after the playoffs are over to assess whether or not Sutter was the problem in New Jersey. If they win a few rounds, then maybe you can say that, but if they get bounced in the first round, then the coaching change wouldn't appear to have mattered. Second, I think rockmorton has it right. Any worker can tell you that their productivity is going to suffer if they work too long in a workplace that stifles any kind of personal success, creativity or initiative. Some structure is neccesary (ask Mike Keenan), too much robs the workplace of any joy, and with it, any real desire to put in 100%. Yes, they get paid a lot, but they are human. Third, it does seem like the leadership of the team isn't where it should be. I think Iggy is a good captain. I think he needs more leadership support. I think I'd be looking at Mikka Kiprusoff after his spoiled brat demand to the Finnish national team about "make me the starter or I stay home." He makes a crapload of money for a guy who has, on average, half of a good season a year (seems like every year we hear about what a slow starter the guy is), and one post season with success since he became a starter (three playoff round wins in 5 seasons, all in one year). Maybe he's A) not the money goalie that he appeared to be in 2004, and B) maybe that attitude towards Finlands national team is indicative of an attitude problem that isn't immediately obvious. He's playing great now, but again, he hasn't gotten Calgary out of the first round in a half a decade.
    1



nolanincalgary Posted
(2010-01-27 12:37:04)

profile picture


Agreed. This "defence" first strategy does not work in today's NHL. One would argue, "Look at New Jersey." Jersey is a different story. You have a team that has ingrained this system for years, drafts and trades for players that will play within that system, plus they have Brodeur who allows you to do that. Jersey has also had a couple offensive minded players to help. Iggy has . . . JOKEinen, HA, what a joke. It's a philosophy change that is needed. They need to get quicker and younger. I'm at the Dome every game, fans are sick of the losing and the low scoring games. They'd rather see a 6-5 loss with lots of action then a 1-0 Shoot out win. I think if this continues, major changes will occur at the end of the season.
    0



rockmorton Posted
(2010-01-27 12:20:48)



I am starting to disagree with the idea that this is the players fault. If you look at the coaches the Flames have had, you notice a trend. First, Darryl Sutter implements a system involving a defensive system and putting intense pressure on the players to maximize their effort and production. First year of the system, Cup final. The lockout year happened. The game starts moving toward high tempo - offensive hockey. Second year of DSutt's system of defence and riding players, nothing. DSutt steps down and puts Playfair in. Different coach, same system. Fighting amongst the coaches and players is rumoured. Same result first round exit. DSutt drops Playfair and puts in his mentor Keenan, blaming the players. Keenan opens it up too much, giving the Flames no structure and the Flames flounder. Two seasons and two first round exits, in comes BSutt, with DSutt saying the players had "special needs". Now, it looks like the players have tired of struggling under the oppresive, boring system the Sutters while the rest of the league (SJ, Chi, Wash, Pitt, Van, Col, have thrived with uptempo, offensive minded hockey. Iggy looks especially burned out. He has been playing almost 6 full years under a defence first system that removes any creativity (Brent does not allow drop passes, in case you didnt know), and he has not had anyone of his offensive caliber on his line in that time. I think the players are tired of being told that the only reason the "system" doesnt work is because they dont care enough and arent commited to winning. I dont blame them. You can only whip a horse for so long before it stops responding. Farm boys like the Sutters should know that.
    2



oil_drop Posted
(2010-01-27 10:45:22)

profile picture


I'm sorry, but i couldn't agree more. The flames have essentially gone through 4 different head coaches (D. Sutter, Playfiar, Keenan, B. Sutter) with essentially the same core (Iggy, Phaneuf, Regher, Langkow, Kipper) through it all and have amounted to one trip to the final and 4 straight years of one and done. There are only so many coaches that can be fired before you have to realize it's not the coach, its the players. The problem the flames have is that they can't score, forget seconday scoring, their marquee players (Iggy, Jokinen, Phaneuf, Langkow) just aren't producing. They have some pleseant surprises in Bourque, Glencross, and Dawes, however, these players were all considered spare parts by their respective organizations, and maybe perhaps this is why. Now that they have hit a slump, all production has stopped. To compound problems further, D.Sutter has stocked the farm team with defensive players, they cannot call up anybody to help offensively either. For the flames to go any further they are going to find some offensive help at the end of the season when some of their contracts come off their books.
    1



austrocanuck Posted
(2010-01-27 10:30:09)



I have not jumped off the bandwagon, but am nervous. An interesting premise. I no longer live in Calgary, and living in Europe do not see many games. A buddy of mine thinks that Regehr and Phaneuf both have minor injuries that affect their skating and hitting. He thinks that the boys are just squeezing the stick too hard and will bust our of this slump. He is an eternal optimist and also reminded me that in 1986 when Calgary lost to the Habs in the SC finals they had a stretch during the season where they lost 9 in a row. I hope his optimism is warranted! I am getting sick of the Iggy haters. He is also in a slump but will bounce back.
    0



tpaul15 Posted
(2010-01-27 10:22:49)

profile picture


I suspect your supostion may be right, but didn't they have similar issues with Keenan? It sems to me that their problems exist in the locker room. In my mind, the players control how hard they play and effort is a reflection of character and leadership.
    1



1

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
This Week - Subscribe Now

What do you think of the two-year deal worth $2.75 million per season Chris Stewart signed with Colorado?





"I think we'll be a real nice surprise this year. Some people, you know, are hard on us...as far as the end of the year and not being happy at how things went. It's a fun time of year. You read all the different things - what some people like or are excited for. Some people pick certain teams to win. But none of that really matters. It's all proving it on the ice. Other years, we've been picked to do this and that. That's part of the fun at this time of the year, but I can't wait to get back playing."

- Flames captain Jarome Iginla on The Hockey News' prediction they will finish 8th in the Western Conference this season.

Our Partners