• Print

THN.com Blog: Ballard should suffer more than embarrassment for stick swing

Florida blueliner Keith Ballard won't be suspended for clocking his own goalie. (Photo by Eliot J. Schechter/Keith Ballard

Zoom Image

Florida blueliner Keith Ballard won't be suspended for clocking his own goalie. (Photo by Eliot J. Schechter/Keith Ballard

We shouldn’t be the least bit surprised the NHL chose not to discipline Keith Ballard for nearly taking his own goaltender’s head off, given its general proclivity for being ridiculously lenient on players who attempt to take their opponents’ heads off.

Hey, the guy feels badly enough already, right? And we can all have a good chuckle about it now, so let’s just leave it alone and move on.

Besides, how embarrassing would it be for the league to suspend a player for hitting his own teammate with a baseball swing? Well, not nearly as much as it should be for doing absolutely nothing.

Let’s just change this scenario a little bit. Let’s suppose that after scoring to make it 2-0 Monday night, Ilya Kovalchuk of the Atlanta Thrashers was picking himself up in the Florida Panthers crease. Let’s just say for argument’s sake, that he was the one who took Ballard’s stick to the side of his head and had to be taken off the ice on a stretcher.

We all know what would have happened then. The league would have come down on Ballard with all its fury. He would have received a long suspension and a substantial fine and the league would have gone to great pains to point out that while the hit wasn’t malicious, that kind of behavior is unacceptable.

It would have been considered a reckless, stupid play that would have been avoided had the player been able to better control his emotions. It would have pointed to the fact that Ballard swung his stick a second time after hitting Kovalchuk’s head to show that Ballard had no regard for the consequences of his actions.

So why, then, should it make any difference that Ballard hit his own goalie instead of a player on the other team? It remains a reckless, stupid play borne of an inability to show some sense of self-control. The only thing that made it acceptable was the fact he hit his own player and that his sense of embarrassment and guilt, not to mention the fact he is the subject of ridicule around the league, should be punishment enough.

Well, it’s not. Of course Ballard had no ill intent toward anything but the goalpost when he swung his stick. These guys never “intend” to hurt anybody when they do these things. But how often do we hear that as an excuse for the things players do on the ice? Personally, I’m getting a little tired of hearing, “Gee, you hate to see a guy get carried off on a stretcher, but…”

The fact is, these kinds of “accidents” occur in hockey far more than they do in any other professional sport and too often they are overlooked because of the age-old excuse that players are reacting to an ultra-competitive situation and that will always be one of the hazards of the game.

Related Links

Well, that’s hooey on so many fronts. First, it’s a lame-ass excuse any way you look at it. Second, it supports the notion that hockey is somehow more competitive and more intense than other sports. And there are people out there who really believe that. Why else would players get off so lightly when they do these things?

Once again, it comes down to the culture of violence that surrounds the game and the level of acceptance that hockey allows when it comes to these kinds of things. Does a pitcher react to a home run by drilling the ball at nobody in particular? Does a football player throw his helmet into the crowd when a touchdown is scored against his team?

No, but you see hockey players constantly breaking their sticks over the net or against the boards when their team is scored upon and everyone seems to view it as acceptable behavior. Even the Panthers don’t plan to do anything internally about it.

Well, the NHL has once again blown an opportunity to make a statement here. This incident could have very well had tragic consequences. And for a league that is as litigious as the NHL, it’s shocking one of the lawyers in the league’s head office didn’t contemplate just how much liability the league might have had to bear had the situation not turned out so well.

And because it chose to do nothing, everyone might not be quite as lucky the next time something like this happens.

Ken Campbell, author of the book Habs Heroes, is a senior writer for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog will appear Wednesdays and Fridays and his column, Campbell's Cuts, appears Mondays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.


Blackberry

COMMENTS (34)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


sturmruger1 Posted
(2009-12-03 21:19:30)

profile picture


I am on the fence as to whether Ballard should have faced disipline from the leauge. What he did was extremly reckless sure,but there was no intent to injure anyone. Maybe the leauge, instead of suspending Ballard for an accident, should tell the refs to give a unsportsmanlike penalty for temper tantrums like Ballards.This would stop this situation from happening in the future(most times). On the other hand maybe Vokoun should have just made the save on Kovulchuk and none of this would have happened.(joking)
    0



aussiedave Posted
(2009-12-03 17:47:09)

profile picture


bubblewild - You're an idiot! Just look at the situation, Vokoun was down, in his crease and Ballard was standing to the side. You can clearly see that Ballard did not intentionally hit Vokoun and it's not like he had to reach or move in any direction to make contact with him. Vokoun was just unlikely enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. If Vokoun is 1ft further away from Ballard, then this article never gets written! I know you can say the same thing for head shots or blind-sided checks, but those are incidents that happen all the time, I can't recall if I have ever seen a situation like the one above. And KEN - If you don't think the NHL looks after it's players, please consider the Clint Malarchuk situation. They did a pretty good job of never running into that situation ever again. Would everyone just relax!! Injuries and stuff are a part of every sport! Even Orr only played 10 seasons. I had so many points to make but I got to fired up writing this and probably didn't make any sense at all - just like Ken!.. haha
    0



singollo Posted
(2009-12-03 14:18:39)

profile picture


@goord: In that case, we are in agreement. There is a lot right with the game of hockey, and it would be nice to read an article by Ken Campbell that focused on a positive aspect of the game. @Wooton, that situation is world's apart from the Ballard incident. There is a big difference in what you describe, which was just an unfortunate accident, and someone behaving recklessly and hurting another person. The Ballard situation would be more akin to if your brother was walking back to the dugout after another kid had struck out, and the strike-out kid threw his bat across the dugout in frustration and hit your brother in the head. Big difference.
    0



wearelemmings Posted
(2009-12-03 14:18:07)

profile picture


I think Ballard and Steve Mason should be made to go to center ice and let it rip. First guy knocked out loses.
    0



fieldmarshal Posted
(2009-12-03 14:02:07)

profile picture


More often than not, I find it difficult to find much optimism or objectivity in Campbell's articles, but his contining theme of a growing and dangerous 'culture of violence' in hockey isn't rubbish. I'm on the fence about if Ballard should have faced disciplinary action for his stick-swinging. Of course the swing was unintentional, but a high-stick that leads to a cut or more severe injury is still punishable on-ice, regardless of the intent. Players are responsible for their sticks at ALL times. What Ballard did was immature and dumb, and while it wasn't purposeful to injure Vokoun, the fact is that the league needs to figure out how to curb the dangerous frequency of violence that could very well lead to a player becoming blind, paralyzed or worse. I'm sure Ballard and many other players out there will learn from this, but if the NHL instituted a mandatory penalty that resulted from players breaking sticks over crossbars or across goalposts, then this could be the one and only incident of this nature. If another player does what Ballard did, the league should enforce a four-minute double-minor for unsportsmanlike behaviour, followed by a suspension for the player and a fine for the organization. I doubt many players will repeat Ballard's foolishness when their team is scored on during a four-minute PK, the team is without his services for a couple games and they take a hit (no matter how small) in the pocketbook. Message sent.
    0



gooord Posted
(2009-12-03 12:30:13)



Singollo, I actually agree with Kenny and you that the NHL should do something about this. What I was saying is that it's the way he goes about writing these articles that gets people ticked off. He portrays the sport as a "devil's game" and constantly uses other sports as a benchmark. He takes these RARE occurrences and writes as if they happen all the time. I think hockey players are the classiest athletes in the world. It would be nice to read some positive articles for once but it won't happen on this blog as long as Kenny keeps drinking his "half-empty" glasses of kool-aide.
    0



wooton Posted
(2009-12-03 12:28:30)

profile picture


During a little league baseball game my brother was walking by a batter on his team who was taking warmup swings, both werent paying attention and he got hit in the head, he was fine, just had to ice it and whatnot, but the point is we didnt call the cops and demand discipline. Because it wasnt on purpose, they both made a mistake, we forgave him, it wasn't a big deal. It was careless but give the guy a break for christs sake
    1



chris_k Posted
(2009-12-03 12:10:58)

profile picture


@Singollo: You are 100% correct of course. The NHL needs to punish players for being reckless. Reckless can equal severe danger. Whether it is an intention knee on knee (no I do not think OV's was intentional) or hitting your own goaltender with your stick, it is still extremely dangerous and possibly career ending. What if that stick hit Vokoun's coratid artery? He could have and quite possibly would have died. In that case intent would mean little. I for one like seeing the level of skill these athletes show, and would not want someone's career cut should due to stupidity. These kinds of things should not happen.
    0



ibleedblue Posted
(2009-12-03 11:02:21)



goooord hit it on the head. While I don't entirely agree with the article, past comments on it from myself and others just show the negative picture that Campbell often paints in his articles.
    0



singollo Posted
(2009-12-03 10:57:22)

profile picture


@goord: I recognize the dislike for Campbell on these threads, and I agree with much of the criticism of him: that he's too negative, that he wants fighting out of the game, etc. However, just because I think he's USUALLY wrong doesn't mean he ALWAYS is, and this is a time when he's right on, and I think it's the height of foolishness to ignore a good point by someone, simply because you dislike them or disagree with what they've said in the past. And your comparisons to other sports actually strengthen Ken's case. In the NFL, when Albert Haynesworth used an opponent's head as his personal dance floor, he was ejected from the game and given a 5-game suspension: over a quarter of his season! The women's soccer player at the University of New Mexico who lost it on the field was suspended by her school indefinately. Even MLB suspends pitchers for bean balls to the head (granted, they are cupcake suspensions, but hey, it's more than what Ballard got). That's the point: when stuff like this happens in other sports, there's a punishment. In hockey, it's just "oh well, it's an emotional game and he lost control for a minute". Eventually, someone is going to have their career ended because of this thinking, and it won't be due to a legal check that just went wrong: it'll be due to a reckless act that was eminently avoidable, if the NHL actually had the stones to do something.
    1



1 2 3 4

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
This Week - Subscribe Now

What do you think of the two-year deal worth $2.75 million per season Chris Stewart signed with Colorado?





"I think we'll be a real nice surprise this year. Some people, you know, are hard on us...as far as the end of the year and not being happy at how things went. It's a fun time of year. You read all the different things - what some people like or are excited for. Some people pick certain teams to win. But none of that really matters. It's all proving it on the ice. Other years, we've been picked to do this and that. That's part of the fun at this time of the year, but I can't wait to get back playing."

- Flames captain Jarome Iginla on The Hockey News' prediction they will finish 8th in the Western Conference this season.

Our Partners