• Print

Bob McCown's Blog: NHL should suspend Ovie's suspension

This knee-on-knee his on Carolina's Tim Gleason will cost Washington's Alex Ovechkin two games. (Photo by Gregg Forwerck/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

This knee-on-knee his on Carolina's Tim Gleason will cost Washington's Alex Ovechkin two games. (Photo by Gregg Forwerck/NHLI via Getty Images)

The NHL’s decision to suspend Alex Ovechkin for two games as a result of his knee-to-knee hit on Tim Gleason raises a few questions. Understand that I don’t object to the suspension itself or even the length of the punishment. It is what it is.
 
But the rarity here is that it was offender who wound up injured. At the time of this writing, it is unclear whether Ovechkin will miss any time as a result of his injury. Apparently, he skated for about five minutes before practice Tuesday and while he complained of stiffness, doctors haven’t uncovered any tangible damage and the player is listed as day-to-day.
 
But it is possible, perhaps probable, that Ovechkin will serve his two-game suspension for games he wouldn’t have been able to play under any circumstance. Like so much of the disciplinary policy of the NHL, this hardly seems just.
 
I liken it to the situation in baseball when a starting pitcher gets into a brawl with a hitter and each wind up with, say, a three-game suspension. The everyday player pays the price, because he misses games. The starting pitcher, meanwhile, is suspended for days when he wouldn’t have played under any circumstance. While blatantly unfair, baseball hasn’t come up with a solution.
 
While I have long subscribed to the theory the NHL’s disciplinary policy is laughable, even I admit this one is so unusual and so rare, no one could have anticipated it.
 
An obvious suggestion would be to “suspend the suspension” until Ovechkin is able to play. That could be easily determined by allowing him to play one game once he is healthy and then have his punishment kick in from the next game. Of course, that would be logical and this is a league that too often ignores logic in favor of precedent.
 
Now, if Gleason was going to be out for a prolonged period, we’d be into the debate over whether Ovechkin should be forced to sit out at least as long as the Hurricanes player.

Related Links

But we’ve been down that road too many times already.

Bob McCown, author of the book McCown's Law: The 100 Greatest Hockey Arguments, hosts PrimeTime Sports, the most listened to sports talk radio show in Canada. Reaching more than a million listeners each week McCown is known for his argumentative nature and acerbic demeanor. You can read more of McCown's work at fadoo.ca.

COMMENTS (18)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


boltsrising Posted
(2009-12-20 06:05:54)

profile picture


Ovechkin should have gotten his "suspension" enforced after he came back and played several games at his average ice time, and more than 2 games for this confirmed repeat offender. The refs and Bettman inexplicably saw absolutely nothing wrong when the DIRTY SUPERSTAR intentionally went headhunting and ended former teammate Jamie Heward's career. Then the gutless wonder, knowing exactly what he had done, didn't have the decency to personally contact Heward in the hospital. Instead he gave the utterly transparent excuse that he didn't do it intentionally (yeah, right!) and that he asked his other teammates, who REALLY were concerned, how Heward was doing. This guy needs some real payback the old fashioned NHL way.
    0



cosmoman Posted
(2009-12-04 10:20:08)

profile picture


HI SHOOTOUT. Read your feedback and do agree but if Briere gave him the spear which he did,it is what you and i would have done,go after O vie in a dirty manner because the league didnt have his back,so my point about Campbell not getting it rings true.Every player deserves his right to protection,even from superstars.
    1



esteban1949 Posted
(2009-12-03 21:25:59)



If i could have been Mr. cambell there at the front office of the NHL...I'd doubled the suspention...as it would hit Ovie where it hurts the most...his wallet...but i'm a fan...what would i know ?
    2



hippomancy Posted
(2009-12-03 08:18:36)

profile picture


I actually have to agree with you, Mr. McCown. If Ovechkin is day-to-day, then he isn't actually playing, so 'suspension' doesn't count. The team feels penalised by Ovechkin because he's lost due to self-inflicted injury, and that's okay. Once he's ready to go, then suspend him the two games. For the record, Ovechkin`s description of the incident sounds plausible, when you watch the tape. He wanted a bodycheck, the guy anticipated and zigged. Ovechkin had committed, and the contact made wasn`t the intended contact. A potentially legal contact became illegal, and caused serious injury. Another some point in favor of a less violent approach to the game.
    2



sushibob Posted
(2009-12-03 08:04:03)



Let's just say that it this situation were turned around and it was Gleason who did this to Ovechkin, he'd get a minimumof 5 games. Supposedly Ovechkin was placed on "probation" and the league was not going to take kindly to any more borderline/dirty play from him. This latest incident fell under the "borderline" criteria and low and behold the league got tough and gave him a whopping 2 games. Both players were lucky that this didn't ruin one or both of their careers. As a fan, I love to watch Ovechkin play, but he sometimes goes over the line and does some irresponsible things on the ice.
    2



devouringlump Posted
(2009-12-03 05:35:58)

profile picture


Like $100k is going to hurt Ovechkin. Wow what a punishment! It's like fining someone making $80k a year $888, except normal people don't have all the extra endorsement money in addition to their salary.
    4



bukator Posted
(2009-12-03 00:13:54)



Maybe you're forgetting that Ovie's suspension adds up to over $98,000 being forfeited - not just the games missed. His injury shouldn't factor into this at all. You're suggesting that he sits out for his injury AND THEN serves two more games giving up just under $100K. I love your book Bob but not this argument.
    1



duff_man Posted
(2009-12-02 18:01:19)

profile picture


Dirty Ovie's suspension should absolutely not take effect until he's cleared to skate by the team physician. Being suspended for games he would've missed anyway isn't a suspension at all. And it's funny reading excuses by Ovie apologists about how poor Ovie has suffered enough. LOL.
    5



janb55 Posted
(2009-12-02 17:38:34)

profile picture


Ovechkin needs to learn he's not "above the law", period. Just because a player is a "superstar" doesn't mean they shouldn't have consequences for questionable, borderline, reckless hits. There are players in this league who respect him-- where's his respect for other players?
    4



yesisaiditfirst Posted
(2009-12-02 17:10:30)

profile picture


Ovechkin hit Buffalo's Kaleta on the shoulder and got a game misconduct. Two nights later Kaleta boarded some poor Philadelphia Flyer and got a game misconduct and 2 game suspension - ironic? Then Ovechkin knees Gleason and Gleason comes back in the same game and gets his own boarding penalty for hitting another Caps player. Ironic Again! Even the players who get hit "dirty" don't learn to not play dirty. What difference would adding a suspension to an injury make in the real scheme of things?
    2




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
This Week - Subscribe Now

What do you think of the one-year, $3 million contract Alex Ponikarovski signed with the Kings?





“I don’t think I’ll change too much. I’ll be the same.”

- The Senators Mike Fisher when asked if getting married to Carrie Underwood would make him a better hockey player.

Our Partners