• Print

Bob McCown's Blog: Culture, not players, at root of violence

Kitchener Rangers defensman Ben Fanelli was the target of a Mike Liambas that put Fanelli in the hospital and saw Liambas suspended for the season. (Photo courtesy of KitchenerRangers.com)

Zoom Image

Kitchener Rangers defensman Ben Fanelli was the target of a Mike Liambas that put Fanelli in the hospital and saw Liambas suspended for the season. (Photo courtesy of KitchenerRangers.com)

Questioning the Game…Again.
 
Every one of us has seen it before. And we will again.
 
You are on the highway and while there is traffic, the vehicles around you are moving at the speed limit. Suddenly, a car flies by you traveling 30 or 40 kilometers per hour faster than everyone else.

The driver moves to within inches of the car ahead of him, then changes lanes without a signal, cutting off the vehicle now behind him.

The pattern is repeated numerous times as they weave in and out of traffic and you now watch with equal parts of anger and fear swelling inside you.

You ease your foot from the accelerator, instinctively realizing there is danger ahead. Perhaps nothing happens and the reckless driver disappears into the distance.
 
But what if he miscalculates one of those lane changes and clips another car, sending it spinning off the road or into the path of an 18-wheeler. The horror is unfolding in front of your eyes. People are seriously injured. Perhaps worse.
 
The reckless driver didn’t mean to cause the accident. He had no axe to grind with the people in the other car. He didn’t even know them. No one would even suggest there was intent.

But in every civilized society, he will be held responsible. He will be charged and convicted, because he demonstrated a willful disregard for the safety of others. The punishment will be severe and those who merely read the account of the accident in the next day’s paper and certainly those who witnessed it will not offer a syllable in defense of the accused.
 
This past weekend, Mike Liambas of the Ontario League’s Erie Otters raced at full speed from the blue line and hit Ben Fanelli of the Kitchener Rangers. The impact sent Fanelli’s head into the glass, causing his helmet to fly in the air. Like you, I have watched the video numerous times.
 
Unlike so many hockey hits that result in injury, Liambas did not leave his feet, he didn’t use his elbow and his stick was not involved in the play. Now make no mistake, this was not a legal hit. It was certainly charging, perhaps boarding, but it was not the kind of collision we are used to debating.
 
There is no evidence Liambas intended to injure his opponent. To the best of my knowledge, he had no axe to grind with Fanelli. I suspect he didn’t even know him. But in a civilized society he must be held responsible; his actions demonstrated a willful disregard for the safety of others.
 
Yet, this is hockey and so we have heard many syllables offered in the defense of the accused. We have heard what a nice kid he is…how he makes good grades in school and of the time he has spent doing “good deeds” in the community. These are the kinds of things that might well be taken into consideration at a sentencing hearing, but would have no relevance in the determination of guilt or innocence.
 
What we have heard little about was the fact this overage junior player had demonstrated few of the skills one associates with a player at this level. He had played 129 games with Erie, accumulating five goals and 13 points. Where the stats appear all too relevant are in his penalty totals: 361 minutes.
 
Undrafted players who have never generated more than five points in any one season but continue as overage players are clearly there for another reason.

Related Links

Some have denied Liambas was a goon and I cannot dispute that assertion, having never seen him play. But numbers rarely lie. He was, at the very least, a tough guy. There was no doubt he knew what was expected of him, just as there can be no question his coach, GM, teammates and even the owner of the team knew.

I assume they never contemplated the risk before last Friday night and I doubt they have experienced an epiphany since.
 
I have said many times that what is wrong with hockey has nothing to do with those who play the game. They merely try to put into practice what they are taught and what is expected of them.
 
No, it is those who have established a culture within the game that is without consideration, concern or respect for those who wear a sweater of a different color who are responsible.

And while a 16-year-old…a kid…lies in a hospital bed with his future indeterminate they have the audacity to argue that David Branch’s yearlong suspension was too harsh.

They try telling us this was nothing more than another player “finishing the check.”

They insist that Liambas was “absent malice,” therefore he must not be condemned. They even attempt to turn the debate into an issue over whether or not a 16-year-old should be allowed to play with a 20-year-old.
 
Repeatedly over the past few days I have heard and read how this incident was merely “part of the game.” Well, those people are right. It is part of the game and that is exactly what is wrong.
 
Shame on all of them. Shame on them for their colossal and ceaseless stupidity.
 
They have forgotten Don Sanderson, just as they will quickly forget Ben Fanelli. Most of all, shame on them for that.
 
Bob McCown, author of the book McCown's Law: The 100 Greatest Hockey Arguments, hosts PrimeTime Sports, the most listened to sports talk radio show in Canada. Reaching more than a million listeners each week McCown is known for his argumentative nature and acerbic demeanor. You can read more of McCown's work at fadoo.ca.

COMMENTS (20)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


bongo4420 Posted
(2009-11-19 17:15:07)

profile picture


"I have heard and read how this incident was merely “part of the game.” Well, those people are right. It is part of the game and that is exactly what is wrong. Shame on all of them. Shame on them for their colossal and ceaseless stupidity." I would say the same thing about his favourite sport that encourages the far more deadly bean ball. http://www.theoav.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7019
    0



fieldmarshal Posted
(2009-11-10 11:04:42)

profile picture


I will agree with McCown and others when they state that there is a severe lack of consideration and respect for fellow players in hockey, be it in the NHL or junior leagues. The hits from behind, stickwork, cross-checks to the face, sucker-punches, etc are sickening to watch when they occur and it seems to happen more often than ever. The NHL has 'tried' to curb on-ice violence with suspensions, fines, etc, but the double-standards and casual indifference to malicious hits doesn't appear to diminish no matter the repercussions. Its despicable to see some of the more recent incidents in the NHL, like Simon trying to behead Orr, or Downie launching himself like a missile at Donovan, but the Fanelli-Liambas incident shouldn't be racked up with the more notorious hockey controversies. McCown states that he has watched tape of the Liambas hit several times, but if he REALLY watched it, he'd see that Fanelli turns to watch Liambas roaring down the right side, obviously intent on trying to force a turnover or attempt a clean check. McCown says it himself - no elbow or stick was used in the hit, and Liambas didn't leave his feet... Given the nature and severity of the injury to Fanelli, many have questioned Liambas' 'excessive' speed skating down the wing, but he's a COMPETITOR trying to win, which is what hockey is all about. Fanelli turned AWAY from Liambas as the latter was forechecking and a very unfortunate accident occured. Hockey players, from pee-wees to pros are taught to give 100% every shift, play physical, but play smart. What's Liambas supposed to do if Fanelli is aware that he's coming? Slow down and permit his opponent to cleanly play the puck without any opposition? Some competitor Liambas would be... Branch and the OHL got it DEAD WRONG when they announced the ridiculous suspension. They used the wrong incident and injury to make an example. Liambas could have been called for a 2-min charging minor, but the likely termination of his hockey career and livelihood is nothing more than the OHL overreacting and trying to prove that they're serious about curbing on-ice violence. Liambas is a scapegoat, plain and simple.
    0



hippomancy Posted
(2009-11-10 10:09:11)

profile picture


My basic thought is that at 21, Liambas should be able to anticipate outcome for action, especially as he has clearly specialised in 'toughness'. When another player turns to an extremely exposed position, that "gotcha" moment shouldn't be a happy one, but an 'uh-oh' moment. Changing momentum or direction could injure Liambas, but he's the one charging and should be willing to take the bruising, rather than slamming the guy and saying 'finishing my check'. The fact that the other guy was 16 was not Liambas' issue; he was culpable only of either malice in slamming him, or negligence in not seeing the outcome pending. The fact that a young guy who maybe responded with a bad choice of move when seeing someone bearing down is the league's issue. If they're gonna hit, teach them how to take the hit, not just throw it. Personally, if there's a fight, fine,... two consenting players. But stupid blindsides are ugly, and aren't very sporting. (A contradiction to enjoying Lindros getting nailed, yes, and I do feel conflicted...) You can't police all the possibilities, but you can punish when it goes wrong. I feel Bertuzzi did get off easy with the league. Negligent drivers are punished when they cause harm, so should be negligent players. And try to not have bullies playing with kids. Why was Liambas even in that league, let alone that position. If he's not fit for higher levels, then send him off to his future career now, and get started on his beer-league patter...
    -1



zakdad Posted
(2009-11-09 20:23:55)



Great article!!
    1



wraith11 Posted
(2009-11-09 19:09:11)

profile picture


It's unfortunate that the player on the Kitchener Rangers was hurt so badly and I do hope that he recovers to lead a normal life. A pro hockey career is a bonus. The play where he was hurt happens a lot in a hockey game. A player needs to have their head on a shivel; it's the same as driving. You need to be aware of the idiots on the road and drive defensively. The player on the Rangers needed to protect himself and not put himself in a vulnerable position. I don't agree with the suspension at all. Dave Branch feels he needs to be the hockey policemen, judge and executioner. He needs to take a step back and realize that this sort of hit; mind you not to the same extent of the injury, countless times a game. Hockey is now at the point where body contact is frowned on. I would much rather see a good body-check then all the stickwork that is still a part of the game. The instigator rule should be abolished, players would then be held accountable for their actions as they would realize that they couldn't be running players because they would have to answer for their actions. In today's hockey, this sort of player doesn't!!
    -2



knuckledragger Posted
(2009-11-09 16:27:15)



It was an awesome, devestating and CLEAN hit. But this and the just announces unrelated suspension to Glencross signal the removal of hitting from hockey. I'm sure the latte-sipping Campbell, Proteau and this loudmouth Bob are all very happy. Do any others rue the day all these "soccer fans" took over the press coverage of our game? Makes me sick. Oh well, as long as the fancy-pants Toronto-based goofs are all happy!
    -2



midnightangler Posted
(2009-11-09 15:39:16)

profile picture


its not really fair in any way to compare this hit to speeding on the highway. It is debatable whether Liambas broke any rules. If Fanelli hadn't turned around at the last second, this is a pretty typical hit. If Fanelli doesn't get injured, are we debating the hit? would a penalty have even been called? Its kind of a cop-out to suspend Liambas for this hit. I've always felt that it makes some sense to enforce rules to protect defensemen from this type of hit. Charging is probably the right thing to call it, but it is almost never called under these circumstances. Dump-and-chase is pretty much designed to level defensemen behind the net with the hope that they'll turn the puck over. When I was about 15, I was pretty small for my age and playing with a lot of older players. I took some pretty bad hits, including once when I was boarded from behind in the corner and sustained a neck injury (fortunately not serious-i was only out 6 weeks). Defensemen in particular have to learn how to protect themselves from this kind of hit or it can be very ugly. Turning at the last second is not the way to protect yourself. It is extremely important for youth hockey coaches to properly coach defensemen about how to take hits behind the net. The culture of hockey is not going to change because of this hit or any other. However, proper coaching can minimize the chances of this kind of thing happening.
    0



angrybaldguy Posted
(2009-11-09 14:40:27)

profile picture


Mike Milbury is like listening to George W. His time has come so now please go away.
    1



ethies Posted
(2009-11-09 09:33:58)

profile picture


The problem with this is the lack of specificity. Reading the NHL rulebook with an objective eye, this hit could either have been legal or illegal as it was completely at the discretion of the ref. This 'zero tollerance' talk really scares me. Change the hockey culture to make the most violent of hits unacceptable, good. What I would be concerned about is how you make this transition. Since there are no rule specifics as to how any of these hits are really defined (they suspend or not on a very irregular basis), if the refs decide to clamp down are we going to be throwing out a player per game? Per week? I'd like to see things changed so that players have less to worry about when it comes to serious injuries, but it must be done very carefully lest we throw the baby out with the bath water.
    0



brian_p Posted
(2009-11-09 08:48:00)

profile picture


I actually saw the byline for this column first and thought "oh great, another place for that blowhard McCown to spout his drivel," but after reading I have to say that was actually quite a thoughtful read. Nicely done, Bob.
    1




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
This Week - Subscribe Now

Who is the greatest Finnish player in NHL history?




THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

"If you look, there are only 17 guys that have done it before. It’s a very, unique special group. You need a lot of luck, hard work and great players to play with. I have had all those things. That is why this is possible...I remember the first one like it was yesterday. It was at the Cow Palace against the Sharks. Time is flying. It’s unbelievable how fast it goes."

- Teemu Selanne on scoring his 600th career NHL goal.

MOBILE.THN.COM - Get hockey on the go

Our Partners

Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates