• Print

Screen Shots: Forsberg not a risk worth taking

Peter Forsberg last played in the NHL at the end of the 2007-08 season with Colorado. (Photo by Jeff Vinnick/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Peter Forsberg last played in the NHL at the end of the 2007-08 season with Colorado. (Photo by Jeff Vinnick/NHLI via Getty Images)

Remember that fantastic Dana Carvey character from Saturday Night Live? No, not ‘The Church Lady.’ I’m talking about ‘The Grumpy Old Man,' who redefined the word “cantankerous” before John Tortorella provided the definitive redefinition a few years thereafter.

Carvey’s character was satirizing the romanticizing of the past that, for many people, always accompanies the passage of time; indeed, for The Grumpy Old Man, no aspect of the modern world could ever compare to the glory days of his youth.

Why am I bringing this up?

Because Peter Forsberg’s hockey career appears to be enjoying yet another fist-through-the-dirt episode a la the classic horror film Carrie.

Because, slowly but surely, the whispers of another NHL comeback from him are growing louder.

And mainly because I don’t want any more NHL fan bases to suffer through another high-risk/low-reward saga that has been Forsberg’s hallmark since 2006.

Prior to that, there was no doubt the Swede deserved to be recognized as one of the game’s all-time greats. He was as fearless and fearsome as Eric Lindros, without the menacing physical frame (or the willingness to drive Bob Clarke to an early grave) of the man he once was traded for.

In terms of on-ice creativity and bred-in-the-bone determination, Forsberg had few peers. Anyone who watched him emerge as arguably the planet’s most electrifying playmaker during his halcyon days in Colorado knows full well how much more dominant he would have been if he spent his 20s in today’s more talent-friendly NHL.

Unfortunately, that kind of conjecture isn’t worth the breath or brainwaves spent on it, because the reality is Forsberg’s career arc peaked during a period where his opponents were permitted to do everything short of mace-ing and maiming him on the ice.

And his willingness to absorb huge amounts of punishment took a merciless toll on his 6-foot frame; if you check out his injury report – just since the turn of the century – you’d be forgiven for thinking you were looking at an entire expansion franchise’s history of medical maladies.

Related Links

Which brings us back to the present – and Forsberg’s umpteenth attempt at an NHL return.

I’m not contending he should be forced to retire once and for all. If Forsberg wants to continue to play in Sweden, or accept a king’s ransom in Russian rubles by playing in the Kontinental League, he can do so for the next 10 years and I’d never utter a peep in protest.

However, any NHL franchise tempted to clear out cap space and a roster spot for him should be immediately audited for an outbreak of Mad ‘Now!’ Disease – a virus many teams are infected with around trade deadline time, when GMs and owners become convinced they’re just one key player away from a Stanley Cup championship run.

I don’t know about you, but if I were a GM, I’d much rather see how a young player on my roster would perform in a highly-pressured post-season situation – and have him learn from it for subsequent Cup chases – than take a chance on a 36-year-old who has played only 144 NHL games since the 2004-05 lockout ended.

Ask the Nashville Predators if they still would trade away Ryan Parent, Scottie Upshall, a first round draft pick and a third-rounder for Forsberg, as they did in 2007. After they drop the standard platitudes about hindsight and 20/20, they’d have to admit the 22-game gamble wasn’t worth it.

Forsberg’s surname forever will be associated with on-ice brilliance. But only a Grumpy Old Man and his endless paeans to the past would assume there’s a solid chance Forsberg’s history will be repeated.

Adam Proteau, co-author of the book The Top 60 Since 1967, is writer and columnist for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Mondays, his Ask Adam feature appears Fridays and his column, Screen Shots, appears Thursdays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (14)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


doctorddaveschultz Posted
(2009-11-16 12:25:17)



All it takes is one column by a supposed expert and all of sudden the sheeple are baaing for him never to return. Let me say this: Nobody, barring possible permanent debilitating injury, should want a superstar to stay home. I want to see the best. And Forsberg is one of the best. Another terrible article Adam.
    0



foppafan Posted
(2009-11-09 10:47:25)



Tiny and DukeoFear. Peter played 3 games with MoDo before Oct3 and now 3 games with the Swedish national team. Your suggestions that he shall play the Olympics and THEN NHL doesn't work because of the transfer rules. The reason he didn't play more in the Swedish league is that if he plays in any European league after the NHL has started, he cannot play in the NHL this season. If he chooses to play (he has not decided yet) he needs to choose NHL or Europe already now - for the whole season.
    -1



tiny19 Posted
(2009-11-07 04:49:35)



I'm thinking along the same line as DukeofEarl450. If Forsberg lights em up in the Olympics, and appears to be in good health in doing so, I think a playoff bound team might take the gamble on him, that he can make it through 3 months of hockey. Maybe even used every other game during the regular season trying to save him for the playoffs. It might be a gamble that could have big payoff potential. The $$$ factor is the big question in my mind. How much will he want? And how much will a desparate team be willing to put on the Forsberg Roulette table? Does he want to play in the NHL, or does he want to make some money? That's my question.
    -1



dukeofearl450 Posted
(2009-11-07 00:26:17)

profile picture


The Olympics end Mar 1 and the trade deadline is Mar 3, so if he does anything for the Swedish team in Vancouver he will be signed by for sure by an NHL team needing that extra player for the playoffs.
    -1



janb55 Posted
(2009-11-06 13:33:17)

profile picture


There's no doubt Forsberg could play hockey somewhere-- It just doesn't look like his body can handle the physicalality needed for the NHL. He should consider whether he wants to still be able to walk once he retires than risk doing more damage to his ankle.
    1



brian_kemp Posted
(2009-11-06 10:17:47)

profile picture


Forsberg used to be the best player in the world, and he still is one of the most skilled players around. If all a team needed was a month, I'd say sign him, but teams can't sign players for the third and fourth round of the playoffs to the best of my knowledge. I've got to disagree with you, Adam, on the high risk/low reward thing. He's high risk, no question about it, but he is a high reward kind of guy, albeit with a very high probability of being a total waste.
    1



irishockey Posted
(2009-11-06 10:04:48)



I'm a huge Av's fan and I thought it was great when Forsberg signed two seasons ago so that I could finally get the chance to see him play up close. But I was disappointed at the inconsistency. When he was on the ice he was fantastic, but he could only play one out of three games. More often then not I think his presence was a disruption to chemistry on the lines. I hate to say it... but if he comes back, I don't want him to sign with Colorado. We need consistency.
    4



penaltybox Posted
(2009-11-06 09:48:01)

profile picture


I don't think that this Forsberg issue has anything to do about bashing a FORMER NHL PLAYER who was GREAT during his time. The problem is his TIME HAS PASSED! Every player has the right to play if he can, but the only problem is that this is now the CAP ERA! Money can't be thrown away on a player at this time on his questionable talents and health! The gamble is all on the team signing him, and nothing on the players side. Will Forsberg or any other player ask to be signed for low wages or on his performance? I doubt it, again the risk is just too HIGH! Time for Forsberg to hang up his skates, hopefully without his ankle still in them!
    3



salming Posted
(2009-11-06 03:18:06)

profile picture


Maybe Forsberg can play. He played fairly well for Tre kronor yesterday. But the problem is that a GM will probably dish out too much money for his services in a play off and it will be considered a waste of money and cap space. I they pay him minimum salary and he performs OK (compared to his halcyon days) everybody will be happy and it will end up a nice feel-good story. Provided his foot won't fall apart, that is.
    2



felixthetigermaclean Posted
(2009-11-05 23:56:28)



Surely, Forsberg still has the skill, the heart, and the physical strength to play in the NHL. But even if he hadn't sustained so many injuries, an NHL GM would be unwise to sign him at this point. Bringing in a player mid-season -- even a player with Forsberg's talent and skill -- generally doesn't give a team the sort of boost that the player's past performance might suggest. But maybe after Forsberg has played a full year in Swedish Elite League or the KHL...
    0




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners