• Print

THN.com Blog: Michael Liambas suspension fits the crime

Ben Fanelli is still in hospital, though his condition has improved. (Photo courtesy of KitchenerRangers.com)

Zoom Image

Ben Fanelli is still in hospital, though his condition has improved. (Photo courtesy of KitchenerRangers.com)

After doing his due diligence in assessing Michael Liambas’ hit on Ben Fanelli, Ontario League commissioner David Branch has sent a clear message that attempts to injure will not be tolerated and those who are found guilty of such actions will pay a steep price.

The price for Liambas: the remainder of the regular season and playoffs.

It’s certainly of little satisfaction to Fanelli – who remains in hospital after being knocked unconscious and sustaining cuts to his face – his family and his teammates that Liambas’ OHL career will end as a result of the sentence.

Opinions will surely be varied on the severity of the punishment based on perceptions of the hit (only Liambas really knows what his intentions were) and how much Fanelli’s chinstrap and helmet played a role in his injury. Heated debates have already popped up around The Hockey News office when word of the suspension came out.

In my opinion, Branch, who has long been seen as tough but fair in his supplementary discipline rulings, hit the mark again. Fanelli’s injuries (the most recent update has his condition upgraded from critical, but stable to serious, but stable) certainly played a role in Branch’s ruling; had the result of the hit not been so frightening and the consequences so dire, the penalty surely would not have been as severe.

And while intent, not consequence, should normally lead the logic behind punishment, the fact a young man’s life will forever be changed must have entered the equation. In a sport where questionable hits are becoming the norm, this particular instance stands out as exceptional.

With only five goals and 13 points to go along with 357 PIMs in 124 career OHL games, it was quite clear what Liambas’ role is. He got to where he is by pushing the boundaries; by striking fear into opponents through teetering on the line of legal play. Add that to past indiscretions and justifying the judgment becomes that much easier.

Related Links

In his ruling, Branch suggests, “players must understand they shall be held accountable for their actions. We must all work towards improving the level of respect players have towards opposing players and the game in general.”

That, of course, is so much easier said than done. During research for a potential magazine cover story about respect in the game, THN staffers talked to a wide array of people involved in hockey, including current and former players, about the topic. Few were able to pin down where the lack of respect stems from – assuming things are worse now, and that’s an assumption, not a widely accepted fact – or what can be done to create a balance in a violent game.

As Rory Boylen pointed out in his blog Tuesday, injuries are going to happen and no amount of legislation around hitting and head shots will prevent that.

Liambas’ one-year ban, however, will hopefully resonate through the hockey ranks and keep players on the ice, instead of in the hospital.

Edward Fraser is the editor of thehockeynews.com. His blog appears Thursdays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

Blackberry

COMMENTS (24)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


honduhmatic Posted
(2009-11-06 20:58:32)

profile picture


You know, I'm not an ex-player and I love hockey fights, but... I feel sorry for both guys. One could have scrambled eggs in his head for the rest of his life, and I'm sure the other regrets it. I think the suspension is harsh and ineffective without a rule change or clarification - but if a rule change would undo this, then all for it. 'Purity of hockey' vs meaningful life for a 16-year-old... hmmm... And yes, I realize that Fanelli turned the wrong way at the last minute.
    0



dznutz Posted
(2009-11-06 15:27:44)

profile picture


bluetinge: what you talking about my lack of knowledge. This is not an assault, it is a LEGAL hit in sporting event. The justice system is based on an illegal activity. Have you ever played hockey and do you understand the speed at which things happen ?
    0



jimreinecke Posted
(2009-11-06 10:19:20)

profile picture


Thank you, smiler2729 for being an oasis of common sense in this arid desert of bloodthirsty imbecility that these Philistines are posting (I'm sure that when they're not watching hockey, they merrily entertain themselves by viewing "Faces of Death" videos. . .the decline of Western civilization continues). Branch dealt with this situation correctly. And I have to add this or my conscience will bother me: Uh, Adam Proteau, will you admit now that the aesthetically dreary plastic knob is not infallible?
    -1



smiler2729 Posted
(2009-11-06 08:24:22)



Mr. Branch sent a message with his suspension - there needs to be respect for one another out there on the ice, plain and simple. Another thing that would go a long way toward curbing this type of behaviour would be to make the players wear equipment (elbow and shoulder pads) that aren't made of rock hard plastic. That and bring back the old goal post spikes that don't move. Every player would think twice about running at opposing goalies and players.
    1



bluetinge Posted
(2009-11-06 00:23:59)

profile picture


@dextersinister, Your whole post is drivel. Guess I can't expect too much from a Bruins fan.
    1



bluetinge Posted
(2009-11-06 00:21:57)

profile picture


Hey dznutz, "Simply suspending a player because another player gets hurt is absurb." Do you know our justice system at all? If you assault someone, it's a different sentence if you just hurt them or you kill them. So really, the only thing that is absurb is your lack of knowledge.
    -1



isles64 Posted
(2009-11-05 18:04:58)



Mr.Frasier the CHL has rules in place for head shots(just to inform) that is one of the reasons I beleive the punishment was so severe as well as boarding,charging and hitting from behind. Which are all the things Mr.Liambas did on that play. It is about time the punishment fit the crime and the player was banned as long as the victim was. If Mr. Fanelli never plays hockey again at least Mr.Liambas has an opportunity to play in other leagues next year.
    0



j_n_16 Posted
(2009-11-05 16:10:10)

profile picture


So, Mr. Fraser, what you are saying is that the suspension is deserved because of the resulting injuries. Ok, so does Liambas get off scot-free if Fanelli's helmet stays on and nothing more than a bump or bruise results from the hit? I'm perfectly fine with having Liambas suspended for the entire season, but it can't be because Fanelli is injured. I'll give you another example, let's say that I run a guy from behind and David Branch has a good idea of how many games he wants to suspend people who do that (let's say 15 games). Should I get more(less) games if the player I hit is injured(completely fine)? I think not. Because under that system, people who make questionable hits on players that are prone to injury will recieve more games in suspension than if they do the exact same hit to a player who is a notorious iron man. And that, Mr. Fraser, is just wrong. So agree or disagree with the suspension, but resulting injuries shouldn't be a factor. Take the approach of (for example) that hit could have paralyzed him - so if it did, what is an appropriate suspension (regardless of whether or not they person was actually paralyzed, or even injured for that matter).
    1



stuffybear Posted
(2009-11-05 12:54:38)



I have nothing against a suspension like this as long as it is put forth beforehand. Liambas only did what he was trained to do over and over again for most of his hockey career. We teach our kids from minor hockey all the way up to the NHL level to hit, and to keep your head up. Now we have a new precedent saying 'Respect.' Whos level of respect is this going to be? There are rules for infractions, but not for respect. Co-incidently, causing an infraction is breaking the rules, which is showing disrespect for the game and the players. Therefore, we could suspend someone for tripping someone on a breakaway. If that person breaks an ankle, then we can throw the book at them. Remember when the puck went over the glass and killed the little girl? Should that player be charged with manslaughter? What if the person throwing the hit was at a standstill, and the player skated hard into him? You could get a similar result. Would that be a suspension? The NHL is afraid to put a headshot rule in, but that does not mean the lower levels can't do it themselves. PUT THE RULE IN, AND THEN SUSPEND THE GUILTY. NOT SUSPEND AND SAY "SHOW RESPECT!"
    -1



oliver1976 Posted
(2009-11-05 11:24:03)

profile picture


What about Zac Rinaldo's (London Knights) clear hit from behind on Andrew Yogan (Erie Otters)? He was suspended 8 games for a dirty hit, and a clean hit ends a players OHL career?! Something's way off.
    0



1 2 3

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners