• Print

Campbell's Cuts: NHL back in Quebec City? Think again

Don't get your hopes up to see the slick Quebec Nordiques blue and white sweaters again any time soon. (Rick Stewart/ALLSPORT)

Zoom Image

Don't get your hopes up to see the slick Quebec Nordiques blue and white sweaters again any time soon. (Rick Stewart/ALLSPORT)

Hockey fans who are getting their hopes up and waiting breathlessly for the NHL to return to Quebec City and/or Winnipeg these days might just want to have a chat with the good people of Hamilton.

You see, Hamiltonians have spent the better part of the last quarter century basically having their hearts broken and generally being jerked around when it comes to aspirations of landing an NHL team.

Peter Pocklington used to threaten to move his team to Hamilton when he didn’t like his deal in Edmonton. The league turned its back on a solid Hamilton bid in favor of Ottawa and Tampa Bay and two ownership groups that couldn’t even make their first expansion payments on time. And, of course, it fought valiantly through the desert in order to keep the Phoenix Coyotes out of the clutches of the evil Jim Balsillie, whose stated intention was to move the team to Hamilton.

So when this corner hears about how Quebec City is all-atwitter over the possibility of getting its Nordiques back because its mayor recently had an encouraging conversation with Gary Bettman in New York, it meets the news with a mother lode of skepticism.

The NHL has just spent the better part of the past year propping up the Coyotes and spending all sorts of time and resources in a bid to keep the team from being moved and just last May, Bettman proclaimed that when it came to the league’s struggling franchises, “We fix the problems. We don’t run out on cities.”

So let’s get this straight. The league essentially puts its credibility on the line for a franchise that has been bleeding red ink for years and has almost no hope for long-term success and it’s suddenly going to start moving franchises or expanding to places such as Quebec City and Winnipeg?

Think about it. The league did everything it possibly could to keep out a hockey-mad billionaire who would have instantly turned the Coyotes from a welfare case to a major revenue producer. It did the same thing when Balsillie tried to purchase the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Nashville Predators. It did so under the guise that it’s all about preserving its current markets, so what makes people think it’s going to bail on other trouble spots to start moving teams to Canada?

And all the while Bettman insisted on two things – the league wasn’t kowtowing to the Toronto Maple Leafs by keeping a second team out of the most fertile hockey market on the planet and that it wasn’t a personal crusade against Balsillie. If the league were to approve a move to either Quebec City or Winnipeg, it would prove at least one of those statements was about as accurate as the lockout being all about affordable ticket prices.

Related Links

Those hopeful of reviving the Nordiques talk about building a $250 million arena partially with taxpayer money, of already selling 70 luxury boxes and having a long list of zealous potential season ticket buyers. They have a robust Canadian dollar working in their favor and a local population that is clamoring for its product. And it’s no surprise the NHL is giving them all sorts of (false) hope by meeting with the stakeholders and saying all the right things about how cities in Canada might be the next great unexplored frontier.

And why not do that? It appeases the masses and keeps their hopes of getting NHL hockey back alive. More importantly, it provides places such as south Florida, Nashville, Atlanta and Phoenix with a great bargaining chip when they go cap in hand to their landlords and local governments in search of a better deal.

After all, the Penguins have Balsillie and his power play to thank for their new arena – almost all of which is being paid for by casino proceeds – and the Predators got a bunch of concessions from city hall in Nashville after they almost lost their team to Balsillie.

So, denizens of Quebec City, go ahead and build your new arena because the Quebec Remparts will love playing in that white elephant in a few years. The league isn’t about to expand when most sane people think it should contract. And with its efforts on behalf of the Coyotes it has painted itself into a very dangerous corner when it comes to its financially moribund franchises. If they don’t exhaust every possibility looking for potential local buyers when the next team goes for sale, they’ll look like fools.

It says here Kansas City will get its NHL team back before either Quebec City or Winnipeg will. Our advice to those two cities would be to accept your fate and forget about the NHL. But that won’t keep NHL operators from using those two cities to leverage themselves a better deal in their own markets, just the way they’ve done with Hamilton over the years.

Ken Campbell, author of the book Habs Heroes, is a senior writer for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Wednesdays and Fridays and his column, Campbell's Cuts, appears Mondays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (26)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


boum73 Posted
(2009-10-18 13:01:57)

profile picture


A pre-season game between the Habs ans the Bruins was played in Québec and 15 000 tickets were sold in less than 2 hours... All the province was watching the game on TV. Great ambiance at the game, tailgate partys... A pre-season game was played in Kansas City: Only 9500 tickets sold!!! I was a die-hard Nordiques fan and let me tell you that the possible return of Les Nordiques is THE talk of the town (and the whole Québec province...) Bettman is not an idiot and many things changed since 1995: strong canadian dollar, strong economy in Québec City... I wish that Winnipeg, Hamilton, Saskatchewan and the Maritimes could join a canadian conference in the NHL. I'm pretty sure that in less than 5 years, Tampa Bay, Phoenix, Florida, Nashvile and Atlanta will not be in the NHL anymore... VIVE LES NORDIQUES!!! VIVE LE HOCKEY!!!
    0



edvize Posted
(2009-10-14 22:18:37)

profile picture


Move Atlanta and Nashville to Quebec and Winnipeg, disband Florida and Phoenix and distribute the talent through a dispersal draft. Realign the league with two conferences each having two seven team divisions. DO NOT RELOCATE A TEAM TO KANSAS CITY! You see how that worked out the first team but then again the NHL didn't learn from its experience in Atlanta with the Flames.
    1



jonquixote Posted
(2009-10-14 22:15:48)



The Coyotes debacle was not about keeping a team out of Canada, nor was it really about demonstrating commitment to the sunbelt strategy (though that's important). It was about the NHL and their control over the ownership and location of franchises. Due to the goodwill lost because of the Make It Seven perception, I wouldn't be surprised if the NHL found a way to put another franchise here in the Great White North in the not too distant future. Besides, there's a big difference between what Balsillie tried to do and the normal course. If Atlanta's ownership decided to move their franchise - or sell it to somebody who wants to move it - the legalities become quite different. But the reason I'm commenting is to ask about the comment about turning the Coyotes into a major revenue producer. Does anybody in the NHL really care about that? There's no legitimate revenue sharing program to speak of, there's no boon to the NHL with respect to general revenues earned in that market - that market is producing major hockey related dollars through the usual streams anyway. All another major revenue producing team would really accomplish is jack up the cap and make things more difficult for the numerous Have Not teams while potentially cutting out some of the NHL's leverage when it comes to their next national U.S. television negotiations.
    0



jcrosshockey Posted
(2009-10-14 21:22:24)

profile picture


fire bettman. relocate phoenix to winnipeg, plus either atlanta, florida, & nasville to quebec, hamilton and kansas city. this way you get losing organisations into markets that will suuport their teams better than when they left or never had. if the new york area can last over 25 years, then the toronto-buffalo-hamilton area can do the same. plus you can contract at least 3 to 5 other teams if necessarry to bring total of teams down from 30 so more teams can be a more competitive league. hockey needs a commishoner who knows how to run the league better than bettman. all bettman did was run the league into the ground.
    0



tyler3135 Posted
(2009-10-14 17:59:49)

profile picture


I just wanna say that while I am all for bringing more teams to Canada, people need to stop ragging on the NHL for blocking Balsillie. They don't want to put a team in Hamilton for a good reason as a team in Hamilton would end up bankrupting the Sabres as they rely on fans from southern ontario to pull a meger profit. Its pointless to move a bankrupt franchise only to bankrupt another team. Quebec is a more viable option as the only franchise relatively close is Montreal, which is almost 300km away. And its not like Montreal is going out of business anytime soon. Ill be willing to bet that if Balsillie played by the rules and tried to move a team to quebec or winnipeg, he'd have a team right now. The NHL is only protecting its current owners not discriminating Canada
    0



alexinca Posted
(2009-10-14 01:24:32)



The recurring theme with success in many non-traditional markets - southern California and Dallas, for example - is winning. Dallas and Anaheim are doing fine. Regarding Tom Cotner's remark, Tom Hicks is selling the Texas Rangers and keeping the Stars. Once that occurs, we'll almost certainly return to spending to the cap - as we have since the salary cap was put in place. Before that point, Hicks spent money so that the Stars were usually within the top 5 spending franchises. He's been a great owner and hockey is very successful in Dallas because of that - from NHL down to leagues for kids at the multiple Dr. Pepper Starcenters around the DFW area.
    1



robr_ducky Posted
(2009-10-13 17:59:39)



Thanks danielge for a lone voice of reason.
    0



janb55 Posted
(2009-10-13 17:08:09)

profile picture


The first thing that needs to happen is to send Bettman packing asap. Then find someone who truly likes and understands the sport of hockey and could entice owners, players, etc. to work with him to make the changes that needs to be made(although many of those changes will be extremely tough) to fix what's wrong with this league. Adding more teams in non-traditional markets doesn't work, but there have been teams such as Tampa, Carolina, Dallas, Anaheim that won Cups. How do you deal with alienating the fans in those cities as well as Phoenix, Florida, Atlanta, etc.? Contraction will be more difficult due to loss of on-ice and off-ice jobs. How can you convince the NHLPA that having fewer (but financially stable) teams would benefit them and this sport? If new facilities are built in Quebec CIty and Winnipeg, will those cities get a relocated franchise? I'm a Sabres fan, a small market team located in the northeast past of the US and southern Ontario Canada where there is a huge fan base for hockey, but I wonder what the future of this franchise will be as well?
    0



tomcotner Posted
(2009-10-13 16:18:38)

profile picture


WELL, ONE THING I AM SURE GLAD TO READ IS THAT IT SEEMS as though more and more HOCKEY fans every day are getting ILL TO THEIR GILLS over the thought of keeping GARY BETTMAN in office even 1 more day !!! After 16 seasons, it is clear that it is time for a change, and I would offer up a single idea for us to consider. W A Y N E G R E T Z K Y !!! After all, he IS available. Furthermore, I believe that when this change is completed, we WILL SEE a few more CANADIAN teams pop up with the disbanding and relocating of various teams in the southern USA now, suce as TAMPA, MIAMI, ATLANTA, NASHVILLE, PHOENIX, and perhaps DALLAS, as well, since it's clear that the owner would rather have a NIT WITTY SOCCOR TEAM instead !!!
    -1



onlyoneteaminny Posted
(2009-10-13 13:20:35)



I totally agree. Get rid of those southern teams and get more teams in canada and in the northern US. Of course this will never happen under Basketball Bettman. Quebec and Winnipeg should never have lost their teams in the first place. Winnipeg was much more viable than phoenix ever could be. Plus the quebec montreal rivalry was brilliant. Can anyone get excited about tampa playing atlanta??
    -1



1 2 3

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
This Week - Subscribe Now

What do you think of the two-year deal worth $2.75 million per season Chris Stewart signed with Colorado?





"I think we'll be a real nice surprise this year. Some people, you know, are hard on us...as far as the end of the year and not being happy at how things went. It's a fun time of year. You read all the different things - what some people like or are excited for. Some people pick certain teams to win. But none of that really matters. It's all proving it on the ice. Other years, we've been picked to do this and that. That's part of the fun at this time of the year, but I can't wait to get back playing."

- Flames captain Jarome Iginla on The Hockey News' prediction they will finish 8th in the Western Conference this season.

Our Partners