• Print

THN.com Blog: Choking on the cliches

Leafs GM Brian Burke is usually great for a quote, but

Zoom Image

Leafs GM Brian Burke is usually great for a quote, but "truculence" has become a cliché in short order (Photo by Scott A. Schneider/Getty Images)

Are you like me? Do you cringe and/or grind your teeth any time you hear cliches and done-to-death buzzwords? Well, since the NHL doesn’t have much in the way of news to comment on, I figured we could take another periodical look at the verbal junk that passes for insight both inside and outside the hockey world and break that junk down to its nonsensical essence.
 
Aren’t particularly fond of that idea for a hockey blog in late July? Hey, it is what it is.
 
Moving Forward: Far and away the most widely overused cliche of the moment, this phrase usually is employed as utterly superfluous sentence-beginner (or ender). So instead of an NHL GM or coach saying this:
 
“We want to build a team that competes for the Stanley Cup each year.”
 
You get this:
 
“Moving forward, we want to build a team that competes for the Stanley Cup each year.”
 
See what I mean? No need to tell us which direction you’re headed. You’re just wasting two words’ worth of lip movement and expended breath. Unless you’re blindfolded at the edge of a cliff, we’ll assume you know the right way to move.
 
And, anyway, is it always the right thing to do to move forward? What if you’re standing less than five inches from the business end of an industrial meat grinder? Perhaps the proper thing to do there would be to move sideways for a little while at first, then forward.
 
Whatever the case, ‘moving forward’ is mind-sapping crap. How crappy? That brings me to my next cliché.
 
Time Will Tell: Yes, everybody, time will tell how crappy ‘moving forward’ is in the pantheon of dumb-ass catchphrases.
 
I often see TWT used at the end of columns or news stories, presumably when the writer can’t figure out another way to finish his file. Basically, it’s a tool to say, “I don’t have the slightest clue how this topic is going to evolve” without being so explicit about it.
 
But – and I’m just playing Devil’s Advocate here – what if time doesn’t tell? The human race has had a lot of minutes and hours to figure out the Egyptian Pyramids, Keith Richards’ longevity and the reason Mark Messier cannot only have just one Lay’s potato chip, yet here we are in 2009 and time has been extremely reluctant to divulge any useful data in any of those areas.
 
The moral of this story? Time will tell. Unless it does not.
 
Truculence:
Congratulations go out to Brian Burke and my colleagues in the Toronto media for taking a pretty cool word like this – and in less than a year, turning it into the designated in-joke each time the Maple Leafs acquire a new player.
 
Clearly, the majority of the humor here comes from the dichotomy between Burke’s high-falutin’ lawyer language and the blue-collar aggressiveness he values in many of his players.
 
However, it’s been 10 months since Brian Burke made that particular funny. Either he comes up with something new, or we find a different tri-syllabic word to amuse ourselves with.
 
It’s Always Nice/Great/Tough When…: This is more of a subtle platitude, used by NHLers thusly:
 
Reporter:
So tell us, player who broke Darryl Sittler’s record for points in a game, what went through your mind when you notched your record-breaking 11th point tonight?
 
Player:
Aw shucks and gosh-golly-gee, it’s always nice anytime you get 11 points in a game.
 
Reporter (mumbling to himself as he walks away):
I figured that part out already, you freaking stooge. That’s why I’m standing in front of your dressing room stall and not the stall of your teammate who played four shifts all night and finished minus-4. But I’m sure if I asked him about his performance, he’d tell me, ‘It’s always tough anytime you’re not contributing the way you’d like.’ Which is why I’m not going over to talk to him now.

Related Links

Follow The Hockey News on Twitter and Facebook.

Adam Proteau, co-author of the book The Top 60 Since 1967, is writer and columnist for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog will appear regularly in the off-season, his Ask Adam feature appears Fridays and his column, Screen Shots, appears Thursdays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

Blackberry

COMMENTS (11)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


landersm2 Posted
(2010-03-02 22:05:56)

profile picture


Im am not try to be a wisea*s Adam but if you were to pick up any historical book on Ancient Egyptian pyramids, you would find out pretty quickly how they were built. So the point of this is before you make historical references perhaps you should know what you're talking about. Some historical nerd may and will come along and point out that you're wrong.
    0



maxime12 Posted
(2009-07-30 16:03:12)

profile picture


Here'sthe cliche I hate the most. Every year, the leading scorer, Norris candidate, Calder candidate, ect, gets asked if he'd like to win the award. And every time, you get an answer like : "I don't really think about it, I really want to help the team out, team comes first, team team team, blah blah blah". I want to hear a player say "Hell yeah I want that trophy!And i'm gonna do what it takes to get it!" Reality check mister team players : Winning any trophy in the end of a season most probably means you helped your team out. I'll always remember Crosby saying he didn't really think about the Hart, he just wants to help the team... Euh Sid...Hart is for MVP...anyone should want to win that!!! Show some spirit! Stop lying to our faces just because you want to look good, and plain admit it! You want that award! No one is gonna hold it against you!!!
    0



seattlemetropolitans Posted
(2009-07-22 07:33:45)



My favorite cliche in hockey involves the heart: "He plays with a lotta heart" "Not the most talented guy out on the ice, but he's gotta lotta heart" "He leaves his heart out on the ice" "Check the size of his heart" "He's gotta heart as big as all outdoors"
    0



alwaxman Posted
(2009-07-21 12:02:08)



Hey Jim R. I agree for the most part but some of yours are euphemisms, not cliches.
    0



jimreinecke Posted
(2009-07-21 11:01:16)

profile picture


Fun column, Adam! But there are some other cliches in the game that drive me up a wall. To be specific: Coaches or GM's who call the team bruiser a "role player". Give me a break! Everyone plays a role. . .the guy who scores 40-50 goals a year plays the role of the sniper; the guy who collects 60-70 assists plays the role of playmaker; the guy who stands in the crease and prevents the other team from scoring plays the role of the goalie. If the more appropriate designation "goon" is too distasteful to these guys, can they at least say "he's our enforcer" or "he's our policeman"? Please!. . .A more recent addition to the cliche mill is "taking away time and space". Gee, how Albert Einsteinian! Whatever happened to the simple, honest phrase "we're playing a tight-checking game"? You don't have to be Stephen Hawking to understand the game!. . .And finally, another recent bit of overdone verbal popcorn that's infected hockey jargon is "playing a north and south game". What are you, Shelby Foote? (he was an encyclopedic Civil War historian for those of you that aren't familiar with the name). Broadcasters used to say that guys who made a rink-length rush went "coast to coast". But that would be an east-west dynamic, wouldn't it? Not "north and south". Let's cut the confusing geography, okay? We all know that you're trying to keep the puck out of your end and keep it down at the other team's zone, right? (What kind of geographic direction would a game played at the North Pole take. . .every direction from that particular point is South! A mystery to ponder as we await the coming season which will probably give birth to a few more overused euphemisms and verbal crutches!)
    0



aethier16 Posted
(2009-07-21 10:04:23)



ya emoly25! who would play hockey for chicks? :)
    0



brian_kemp Posted
(2009-07-21 08:03:40)

profile picture


emily25, I want to here the interview that goes like that. "So, guy from team that finished last in its division for the fourth year in a row, what went wrong?" "How the hell should I know, I'm just here for the chicks. I'm talking to you, cutie in the second row with the tight pink shirt. Stop by sometime. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go collect my overinflated paycheck."
    2



hockeyman33 Posted
(2009-07-20 23:44:50)



wow AP you are really bored during summer aren't you
    -3



agoodburn Posted
(2009-07-20 22:04:47)

profile picture


Yeah no uh Prots made a great play out there, we are just all trying to work hard and i was just fortunate to be in the right place at the right time and capitalize. it's a team effort out there and im sure we couldnt do it without everyone playing great and creating alot of energy. no you have to take it one game at a time and we are just gonna go out there and kep working hard and playing the system and hpefully good things will happen
    3



aoystreck Posted
(2009-07-20 17:53:16)



I think Proteau's been reading some of George Carlin's old books... Also, a good one to add in regards to the comments sections of virtually every article/blog/news item on this site: "Give your head a shake." I've read that one so often on here lately it's makingme truculent.
    2




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
This Week - Subscribe Now

What do you think of the one-year, $3 million contract Alex Ponikarovski signed with the Kings?





“I don’t think I’ll change too much. I’ll be the same.”

- The Senators Mike Fisher when asked if getting married to Carrie Underwood would make him a better hockey player.

Our Partners