• Print

THN.com Blog: Is a return to ESPN in the cards?

The NHL Winter Classic is a big draw for NBC. (Photo by Bill Wippert/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

The NHL Winter Classic is a big draw for NBC. (Photo by Bill Wippert/NHLI via Getty Images)

When the NHL renewed its national television deal with NBC this past week, it didn’t exactly receive the financial windfall it had been seeking, but that might change in a couple of years.

Or not. If hockey remains in the realm of fringe sports, the league will always have to battle for recognition and the television dollars and exposure that come with it. If that’s the case, it might not be in any better position than it was when it renegotiated its deal with NBC. The league’s deal with NBC was essentially the same one it had with the network the past couple of seasons. The network doesn’t pay a penny in rightsholders fees per se, but doesn’t lose money on the deal, either.

The way the deal is structured, NBC covers the cost of production for each game. Any revenues generated from the broadcasts first go to paying those production costs and any money that is left over is split between the NHL and NBC, with 80 percent going to the league and 20 percent to the network.

Despite very robust numbers for the Winter Classic and better numbers for the Stanley Cup final games – the two events that make taking on the NHL a worthwhile endeavor for a network – the league still doesn’t have a whole lot of leverage when it comes to its television contract and was not in a position to make too many demands. It wasn’t as though other networks were falling all over themselves in a bid to televise hockey games.

But the league struck only a two-year deal with NBC for one very important reason. Its cable deal with Versus expires in two years and the league is hoping that by having both its over-the-air and cable contracts up for renewal at the same time it will have more options when it comes to its next television contracts.

“It was the right deal at the right time,” said one industry insider.

Could that mean the league is poised to return to ESPN in two years? After all, ESPN is owned by ABC, so the league could package both its over-the-air and cable packages in one deal.

A new deal with ESPN would be a welcome relief for those who don’t have access to Versus and are essentially shut out of NHL games. The league left ESPN after the lockout in favor of Versus after ESPN publicly questioned the value of hockey on its network.

The league has been vilified for the decision from many corners ever since, largely because Versus is far less accessible than ESPN. It’s estimated the Comcast-owned Versus is available in about 71 million homes as opposed to 92 million for ESPN, but ESPN is also far more available in places such as bars and hotels across the United States.

But the fact is Versus has done a very good job with the NHL during its tenure, with good productions and by giving hockey No. 1 billing on its network. It also took the NHL in when television types were staying away from the league in a big way. The network continued to break its ratings records through the playoffs and by making the league its top priority, has provided the NHL with a vehicle to show its product.

Related Links

And that certainly wasn’t, or wouldn’t be the case with ESPN. Even when ESPN had hockey, the sport was often treated like a second-class citizen and if the league went back, there wouldn’t be any guarantees it wouldn’t still take a back seat to things such as golf, NASCAR and poker. Now that the network doesn’t have hockey, coverage of the sport is almost non-existent, which likely wouldn’t be the case if ESPN were a rightsholder.

So if the NHL leaves Versus to go back to ESPN in two-years time, the league should thank its lucky stars it had someone to broadcast its games over the past couple of years. Not to mention the fact Versus has paid the NHL about $70 million per season for a product few others seemed to want. Perhaps the league could find a way to split its games between the two networks and keep Versus involved, the way the NBA does with games on both ESPN and TNT.

The game is much more entertaining and marketable from a television standpoint than it was before the lockout. The games are better, the shootout has added excitement and there are more offensive chances because the game has opened up since the pre-lockout drudgery. The league is full of dynamic, young stars and the level of play has never been higher.

It seems a little unfair how the network that took the NHL through this period might be frozen out when its contract expires in two years.

Follow The Hockey News on Twitter and Facebook.

Ken Campbell, author of the book Habs Heroes, is a senior writer for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog will appear regularly in the off-season and Fridays and his column, Campbell's Cuts, appears Mondays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (17)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


landsharkhockey Posted
(2009-07-23 12:22:40)



Aside from the gift to the world called NHL Center Ice, Versus is the best thing that's happened to hockey in the past 10 years. They broadcast a bunch of games, treat hockey as it's top ticket, and the product has become pretty good. We don't need ESPN.
    0



matthew_sawtell Posted
(2009-07-20 13:04:29)



The ESPN pipe-dream that the fine hockey folks keep bringing up has a rather nasty flaw - the company that owns ESPN, Disney. If anyone that remembers the issues that came with the "Mighty Ducks of Anahiem" - then it should be no surprise with the treatment of hockey at ESPN. Would it be wise for these same fine hockey folk to give GE and Comcast the same treatment? No... but then again, more foolish things have happened before.
    2



alexinca Posted
(2009-07-19 23:55:54)



Kas - I'll stick with Ralph and Razor on the Stars broadcasts...
    0



kas2009 Posted
(2009-07-18 19:50:53)



If you really want to listen to a absolutely superb hockey play by play / announcer.. go to Tampa Bay Lightning .. and listen to them. I don't think it could ever get any better! No way could it improve! Dave Mitchkin is probably the best in the world, hands down. His excitement during the game.. and he knows everyone on the ice.. you can listen even on radio.. and you can follow Dave's voice and know exactly what is happening. Also at the Lightning games/ telicast.. they aren't talking about 40 yrs ago.. during the play ! The Lightning fans have it made.. the best in the business when it comes to taling hockey there! Wish all of you could experience it..
    0



flakey Posted
(2009-07-18 17:44:45)

profile picture


I agree with ike spurlock. Hockey in HD is the absolute best way to sell the sport. You can see the names on the backs of jerseys, the skate blade cuts on the ice, and most importantly you can see the puck. Sometimes the VS. announcers are mediocre, but if the channel could be available in most or all places, I'd rather have the NHL be #1 on VS. than #5 on ESPN. GO KINGS!!
    0



alexinca Posted
(2009-07-18 16:03:51)



Versus needs to renegotiate contracts with cable vendors so that its channel is included in basic packages so that more people have access to it without having to specifically ask for it. ESPN is not the right path... the NHL will get less than 1% of attention there.
    0



esteban1949 Posted
(2009-07-18 13:18:50)



my personal thoughts this issue is and while espn ( to some) does a great & good job, but as Campbell pointed .espn was and remains NO FRIEND of the NHL. While NBC did try and put on a good program with the winter classic and the playoff runs...Verses as a cable outlet did far and away much better job and presentation of many of the NHL games they did broadcast this past season, but as a human being...i have my own personal "Issues" with Both Mike Emrick & Joe Benenati...but then again some one has a beef or complaint somewhere about something...My personal vote ( if we fans were aloowed such a thing) wold be continued coverage by Verses. Why, because it's better to be with an enemy you know...than one you don't...and let's face it...espn...many of us still don't know you ! ...now the other issue for many of the " regional broadcasts' by Fox Sports ( like FS Carolina, Denver,North & etc...) while many are or do have contracts locked in place with home teams) TV Monies/revenues has always been a tough nut to crack for many leagues and teams, and conferences to figure out. For the Broadcasters it's all about one thing $$$$...so should anyone here be "surprised" when espn takes the NHL back ? Sounds like over all More "Fodder" for the fans ...as if we didn't have enough already...
    1



jeltz42 Posted
(2009-07-18 11:16:05)

profile picture


VS is better than nothing and I will leave it at that. I turn on the TV, turn off the sound and put on XM radio to hear the real play-by-play guys. NBC...lets just say they need a whole new crew from the camera guys to the broadcast booth. Hockey is not likely to ever be a mainstream sport in the US. I can accept that. I can accept that I will always need NHL Center Ice and XM Radio to get hockey the way I would like it. Yes, there is a lag between the feeds, but the announcers for VS, ESPN, ABC, and NBC grate on my nerves like fingernails going across a chalkboard. I guess I am just old. The NHL should refuse any offer from ESPN/ABC for coverage rights. The only time hockey will see any air time is when there is no other sport to cover, just like it was in the past. They will push the games off to an unknown ESPN network that nobody gets.
    1



jfinney08 Posted
(2009-07-18 10:45:15)



The main thing I want out the the NHL's next US TV contract is for games to be shown more than twice a week. That is ridiculous. So many great games that could be sold well have been missed because they were on a Saturday or Thursday etc. I like NBC's announcers, not a fan of their analysts. Versus' analysts are pretty bad too sometimes, but they also get some good announcers from time to time - like Joe Benenati. I know that it is highly unlikely for any network to show nightly games in the US, but they have to air more than 2 a week (3 a week after football season).
    4



njdfan950003 Posted
(2009-07-18 07:17:01)



My finger slipped. I mean Mike Emrick. The best hockey play-by-play man in the business.
    1




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners