• Print

THN.com Blog: Best value UFA signings

Craig Anderson will get an opportunity to become a full-time No. 1 in Colorado. (Photo by Eliot J. Schechter/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Craig Anderson will get an opportunity to become a full-time No. 1 in Colorado. (Photo by Eliot J. Schechter/NHLI via Getty Images)

Trying to decide which NHL teams got the best bargains in the early days of unrestricted free agency is a surreal experience. With hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts – in just a few days, remember – it's sometimes difficult to envision anyone being worth that much cash.

Nevertheless, there are always a few good deals that sneak through. Here are five UFA contracts that should work out well for the player's new team:

Mikael Samuelsson, Vancouver (3 years, $7.5 million)
For $2.5 million per season, the Canucks have added a two-way winger with a lethal, heavy shot. He loves to shoot the puck and has quick, accurate release.

Samuelsson has been bumping around the NHL since 2000-01, but it wasn't until he joined the Red Wings machine as a depth player after the lockout that he found his big-league footing.

A big body who can play it physical and work the boards, Samuelsson will get more ice time and opportunity in Vancouver – including, surely, a shot on the top line with the Sedin twins.

Nikolai Khabibulin, Edmonton (4 years, $15 million)
The last time Khabibulin was due for unrestricted free agency, his final act as an under-contract player was to lead the Tampa Bay Lightning to the 2004 Stanley Cup – and he parlayed his championship performance into a multi-year, multi-million dollar deal with Chicago.

Then, he battled injury and inconsistency for three seasons, finally turning it around in 2008-09 – which, coincidentally, was his final campaign before getting another shot at UFA riches.

As the only free agent goalie who was in net when his team won a Stanley Cup, Khabibulin was the best netminding option available. At 36, he's no spring chicken and his performance during his first three seasons in Chicago doesn't instill confidence. But Khabibulin responded with a wonderful 2008-09 regular season and a clutch playoff run, guiding the young Hawks to a conference final berth against Detroit.

The Oilers, trying desperately to break out of a 19-year Cup funk, made a big move at an affordable price; if Khabibulin is healthy and happy, this deal is a steal.

Craig Anderson, Colorado (2 years, $3.6 million)
Who? How much? If you haven't heard much about Anderson, you're not alone.

Related Links

Being a backup goalie in the NHL can be an anonymous job – and if you're a backup goalie for the Florida Panthers, as Anderson was, that goes double. What you need to know about Anderson is this: He effectively took over No. 1 duties from Tomas Vokoun at a couple of points last season and has averaged a .930 save percentage over three seasons in Florida.

He was 15-7-5 with a 2.71 goals-against average and .924 save percentage last season; they haven't seen those kinds of stats in Colorado since Patrick Roy was active. Anderson, 28, is no Roy, but he's a big upgrade over Andrew Raycroft.

Hal Gill, Montreal (2 years, $4.5 million)
A 6-foot-7 defenseman who has some mobility, plays physical and is a penalty-killing demon. All for the low, low price of $2.25 million per season. That's pretty good bang for the buck, as long as Habs fans don't look at the gargantuan Gill and start upsizing their expectations. He is what he is, a solid No. 4-5 defenseman who helps the back end.

Daniel and Henrik Sedin, Vancouver (5 years, $30. 5 million each)
Considering the Sedins' opening salvo was identical 12-year, $63 million deals, you have to like how Canucks GM Mike Gillis was able to get them to sign something a little more sane. (Are you listening, Hawks GM Dale Tallon?)

With the Sedins as part of their core, Vancouver remains a Northwest Division power and a tier-two Stanley Cup contender. Without them, Vancouver is basically Roberto Luongo plus a flock of young forwards.

Granted, they signed before July 1, so they were never really UFAs to begin with – and thus, don't really belong on this list. But it was such a good signing, for both sides, that it couldn't be kept off.

Sam McCaig is The Hockey News' senior copy editor and a contributor to THN.com. His blog appears every weekend and his column, From The Point, appears regularly.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (16)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


jardyb10 Posted
(2009-07-10 20:46:34)



I like how Khabibulin is on this list and the Top 10 Worst Signings. I personally agree with the lattter list. The reasons stated here are the exact reasons this was a poor signing; he's 36, signed for 4 years, for nearly $4 million per season, when he had one good season out of the last 4, NOT coincidentally, his good year was on a contract year. Oilers are dumb. I love them, but this was a bad move. A good move would be getting Heatley, and un-getting Souray. But Heatley's a douche now.
    0



glauzon Posted
(2009-07-10 11:11:35)

profile picture


Can't diagree with this lsit really myslef, maybe an exception of Samuelsson, but whatever, just one thing. Any TRUE NHL fan has heard about Anderson. Let's be honest people, every sports station talked about Anderson and how he "should have been in the all-star game or at least getting recognition" last year. All I'm saying is this guy is not an unknown anymore. Solid signing though. I still thought they should have just signed a cardboard cut out to replace Sievecroft.. sorry.. Raysoft?... I forget his name...
    0



raider Posted
(2009-07-08 10:58:56)

profile picture


Mikael Samuelsson? Wow. Just wow. That guy is a spare part on every team he has played for, the differene with Detroit being they were so good they made him look far better than he was. None of the Detroit fans are crying over his departure and there is a reason for it. If Vancouver buys him out dont be surprised. Hall Gill is good when used right; that is about 15 minutes a night and on the PK. If he's used in a shutdown role his lack of speed and skill gets exposed and he looks pretty bad. This has been the problem with nearly every team he has played for. When the Pens acquired him last year he was good; they use him as shutdown this year his weaknesses were exposed again.
    0



penguins101 Posted
(2009-07-06 14:01:29)

profile picture


well said singollo, seems to me like I said earlier, Gill didn't look too slow when he was shutting down the Flyers, Caps, Canes and of course, the wings. How'd the rangers defense do against the Caps, texas ranger? oh right, they didn't. Depending what the coaches decide to do with Gill, he may or may not succeed in Montreal. They ask too much of him, he will fall flat on his face, they ask him to keep his net safe, the fans in Montreal will love him, except for the odd time when he has a brain cramp and gets in the way of the goalie. No player is perfect and they all make mistakes so it should be expected. Sorry but the Bruins were not a very good team when he played there, and the leafs .... well they have just sucked since the 60's so no point about bring up his time there, everyone sucks when they put a leafs jersey on, (eg. Lindros).
    0



chris_k Posted
(2009-07-06 12:18:52)

profile picture


I'd have to agree with Capsfan. I shed a tear when they signed him. He would have been perfect for the Pens. Congrats though.
    0



singollo Posted
(2009-07-06 10:22:39)

profile picture


Big_Bad_Bob is right. Gill is a useful player, but only in a very specific circumstance. Yes, he is slower than molasses and has virtually no offensive instincts to speak of, but his sheer size and strength make him an effective depth defenseman for a championship-caliber club. This is why he was such a disappointment to most of his clubs in the past, and undoubtedly will be to Montreal this year. If you ask him to do too much, he's a train wreck of epic proportions. If you ask him to be a number 4-6 defender, work the penalty kill, and contribute about 15 minutes of useful time per night, he can be an effective part of a strong team defense. However, because of his size, teams always want to utilize him in a way that is wrong for his skill set. Ultimately there's not much difference in why Gill has been reviled and why players like Drury are now considered overpaid: both were asked to contribute in a way that is clearly beyond the role their skills are best suited for.
    2



toews19 Posted
(2009-07-06 10:06:43)



Hal Gill is horriable he belongs in a beer leauge..if he could keep up .....Khabibulin decides to play in the last year of his contract a good goalie but not worth that much he`s 36.......anderson samuelsson and sedins all good deals
    -1



jeltz42 Posted
(2009-07-06 09:17:19)

profile picture


Mr McCraig, your sarcasic wit is in rare form today. Sign a washed up goalie to a $15 Mil 4 year contract? Send a super slow player to bear the rath of angry Habs fans? Thanks for the from the gut laugh this morning.
    0



caps8fan Posted
(2009-07-06 07:25:01)

profile picture


I think you missed the best value signing yet !! Knuble to the Caps at that price was phenominal.
    1



texas_ranger Posted
(2009-07-06 02:18:43)



Gill's not on your team anymore, so you can quit drinking the Kool-Aid. Ask any Boston fan how sad they were to see Gill go. Mark my words: Gill won't last until Christmas before Montreal's ready to run him out of town.
    3




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners