• Print

Screen Shots: If relocating Coyotes is in the cards, look to Kansas City

The Coyotes survived the latest threat of relocation when the court ruled against Jim Balsillie Monday, but it is still a franchise drowning in debt. (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

The Coyotes survived the latest threat of relocation when the court ruled against Jim Balsillie Monday, but it is still a franchise drowning in debt. (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

Now that Jim Balsillie’s efforts to pull the Phoenix Coyotes out of their familiar environs and into southern Ontario have been suspended by a U.S. bankruptcy court judge, the big question becomes, ‘Where do the Coyotes go next?’

(That is, other than Phoenix – where they’ll linger for a couple more years until the franchise’s new owner gets the nod-and-wink from the league to relocate.)

Because if there’s one thing made apparent during Balsillie’s latest ill-received attempt to become an NHL owner, it is the ungodly mess that NHL hockey in Arizona has turned out to be.

Tens of millions in losses almost each and every year. Widespread civil apathy at the prospect of losing the team. An arena lease that is somewhere between an albatross and an albatross pregnant with a dangerous number of additional albatrosses after months of experimental fertility treatments.

Not a full-on license to print money, in other words. And most definitely not something even a seasoned professional such as Harvey Keitel’s “The Wolf” character from Pulp Fiction could clean up. Therefore, the idea the Coyotes will still be where they are now a decade, or even five years from today, celebrating Radoslav Suchy Appreciation Night and doling out shares in the team to any soul who buys a 10-game ticket package, seems to be wishful thinking at best.

So if the Yotes aren’t destined to remain in Phoenix and the allure of $400 million expansion fees for future Canadian franchises will prevent them from moving north of the border, let’s return to the question in the opening paragraph – where will they land?

My bet? Kansas City. Kansas City, there they’ll come.

Forget about Las Vegas, Houston and Seattle. For various reasons, none of those towns yet posses the ready-made package of interest and infrastructure the NHL will prefer in a relocation destination.

Kansas City, on the other hand, is about as good as it gets. Its greater metro area has about 2,000,000 people; that may not sound like much in comparison to other NHL cities, but the relatively close proximity K.C. has to St. Louis, Dallas, Detroit, Nashville, Minnesota and Chicago means it would be able to draw from a much larger regional base of hockey fans.

As well, K.C. has The Sprint Center, a new building that (a) has been looking for an anchor tenant for nearly two years; and (b) is run by Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG) – a.k.a. a massive jewel in the corporate crown of Philip Anschutz, owner of the L.A. Kings and a significant part of commissioner Gary Bettman’s power base.

Those details, particularly the last one about the Anschutz tie-in, have not gone unnoticed by the league’s power players – at least one of whom also believes K.C. has the inside track.

“You see the connections (Kansas City) has to the (NHL board of) governors – Anschutz, (AEG president and CEO Tim) Leiweke – and it’s hard not to see them influencing the process in K.C.’s favor,” said one NHL governor who spoke on condition his name not be used. “I think the Balsillie debacle has proven that if (the league is) bringing other teams or more teams back to Canada - and a bunch of other U.S.-based franchises don’t fall apart in the meanwhile - the NHL is going to demand huge expansion fees for anyone interested.

“Not so in Kansas City, though. There’s your classic market that the league would lower expectations for in order to keep team locations close to Gary’s overall blueprint for the product. And any league business venture that helps an existing board member’s interests is going to be looked at and embraced before any other.”

Even if you don’t accept that the Anscutz/Kings connection automatically makes Kansas City a frontrunner to host NHL hockey on a full-time basis, you might change your tune when you consider the quiet, steady politicking of league bigwigs – the anti-Balsillie-ing, if you will – that has been conducted behind the scenes for the better part of the past five years in hopes of achieving that goal.

Related Links

Paul McGannon, a Kansas City-area businessman behind NHL21, a grassroots organization dedicated to bringing an NHL franchise back to that area, has been the source of much of that lobbying. In a conversation with THN.com Wednesday, he spoke cautiously, but optimistically about the potential for his dream to finally be realized.

“I think right now where we are is just (waiting) to see what’s available,” McGannon said. “What’s apparent is, everybody has to line up their vision and see how that vision fits with the league and the board (of governors). So what we have to do is respect that. Like everybody else, we’d like to get started, but we have to see how we fit with the league’s future plans.”

Interestingly, McGannon, who worked with the league and AEG to host an exhibition game between the Blues and Kings last September – and who will play the same role when the Kings and Islanders play an exhibition game this fall – doesn’t think the Coyotes necessarily will move to Kansas City.

“Personally, I believe the team will stay there,” he said. “It’s just too big of a market to vacate. It’s the southwest, a huge area that has a lot of people and a lot of transplanted Canadians. All that team has to do is win and that area will develop.

“The NHL was probably early to the party and in five years time that area is going to explode and be like Scottsdale (Arizona), population-wise. If you look at the NFL matrix, the Cardinals are there…and Kansas City is in that football and baseball matrix as well.

“And that’s nothing against Canada; I would love to have the passion of the Toronto area, Montreal, really all the Canadian cities. My personal opinion is, if you could have the player pool, there should be 40 NHL teams. It’s a great sport that should be on display all across Canada and all over the United States, but that’s going to depend on what the governors want to do.”

Doing what the NHL governors want to do is a common theme for McGannon. Take, for instance, his response to a reporter’s question about whether he sees K.C. eventually getting an expansion franchise or a relocated team.

“I think it could go either way, but it’s got to be blessed by the league,” he said. “Whether or not we agree or disagree doesn’t matter, really. We think it’s a great sport and the people involved are just top-drawer. We just want to do things right.”

After Balsillie’s latest court challenge, McGannon’s deference must be music to the ears of Bettman and the owners. And every year the Coyotes continue on their money-hemorrhaging streak, Kansas City’s preparedness and congeniality makes them the prime candidate to stop the bleeding. 

Think you know your prospects? Enter THN.com's Free NHL Draft Predictor contest for your chance to win an RBK Edge jersey.

Adam Proteau, co-author of the book The Top 60 Since 1967, is writer and columnist for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Mondays, his Ask Adam feature appears Fridays and his column, Screen Shots, appears Thursdays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (33)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


brian_kemp Posted
(2009-06-24 12:04:46)

profile picture


First, let me say that if the Coyotes move, it will be to KC, for all the reasons Adam said. Regardless of whether it's a good idea, it's what will happen. I'm going to be in the minority here, but I say Vegas would be a better idea, for a few reasons. One is corporate support, because if anyone believes every one of the (good) casinos won't own a box (and advertise like crazy), they're nuts. Two is regardless of whether the locals take to the sport right away, the visiting teams fans now have a good reason to see a road game, because it's in Vegas. Hell, fans of any team might take in a game if the casinos are offering them cheap. I would. An owner could build a combo arena/shopping/whatever complex, and rake in dough, and never talk about how much cash they are losing. Teams that bring in money can ice a winner quicker, and as anyone who knows anything about sports and fans knows, nothing attracts converts like winning. The reason Phoenix has been such a failure isn't the arena's location, or the non-traditional market, or that Gary Bettman is retarded, it's because the Coyotes started off a mediocre team, and that was the high point of their time (so far) in Arizona. Nothing breeds apathy like failure. Also, the league should expand to 32 teams, and quit after that. The best thing about the time when the popularity of the NHL was attracting the most new fans was divisional playoffs, and two more teams would allow the league to realign into 8 divisions of four teams each. Add another round to the playoffs, have the top 3 teams in each division make the dance, with the division winner getting a bye, and now we have a real division rivalry going. Outside of success, actual hate builds the popularity of the game more than anything. Plus the first two rounds of the playoffs will always be against teams in the same time zone (not a big deal to the Eastern teams, but to us Western guys, it would be nice to be able to stay awake for the ends of more of the games.)
    1



younger1968 Posted
(2009-06-22 15:55:10)

profile picture


NHL can not be serious about Kansas City. I lived in Des Moines, Ia for about three yrs and went to KC on several occasions. The town is about 2M, but does not care about hockey. KC cares more about Kansas State and U of K. Hockey would be on the same time as KU basketball. So goodluck getting fans to go to the game. I went to exhibition game in KC and you were lucky to get 8-10,000 to the game. They do not have an AHL team anymore. The Blades have been gone for several years and they were lucky to get to 6500/game. Secondly, what corporate based do they have there and the answer is very low. Plus the income levels are very low. This would be colossal mistake. You are better to go to Seattle or Milwaukee before KC. Trust the show me state is not interested in more hockey. The state needs an NBA basketball team more.
    -1



alexinca Posted
(2009-06-21 17:37:30)



Adam - KC only has 2 million people and you say that's OK because it has a close proximity to other cities for a good regional base of hockey fans. Did you happen to look at a map lately? St. Louis is a 4 hour drive. OK, that is possible - on weekends. Driving from Dallas is over 8 hours. Detroit? 12 hour drive. Nashville 8:30. Minneapolis 6:30. Chicago 8 hours. Are you kidding?!?!? Nobody is going to drive to KC from those areas on a regular basis. You may have a region around KC that the hypothetical team there can draw a fan base from, but it doesn't include many people in those areas because all of them already have NHL teams. This really comes down to the people of KC being able to fill the arena on a regular basis, and if there is any doubt that can't happen, what's the point of moving the Coyotes there?
    1



puckchaser Posted
(2009-06-20 22:17:38)

profile picture


Yes. Becuase, right now, Hartford doesn't have a viable NHL arena. Some of us here in KC don't consider NHL21 a credible source any longer. Too much of what he has said over the past 10 or so years has been simply marketing spin. Very little of what he says seems to be based in truth. pucKChaser.com
    -1



lightningexpress Posted
(2009-06-20 19:15:57)

profile picture


I wonder why Hartford can't be included in this relocation thing if it stays in the states...does anyone have an answer fort that?
    0



afiturbo Posted
(2009-06-19 20:20:08)



I live and work in the phoenix area, grew up in Upstate NY and played youth and juniors all over the northeast and Canada. The fans are out here, Youth leagues are thriving and new rinks have been built. The two main issues with the Coyotes are IMO: Location: They built the stadium in a field in Glendale. Sure that works for the Cardnials as they only play 8 times a year on a sunday. For anyone that lives in the East Valley (like myself) to make a YOtes game during the week that means sitting in traffic for 1 1/2- 2 hrs just to get there. Thats alot to ask with today's busy lifestyles, especially considering IMO majority of the Valley's hockey fans reside in the East Valley. Win!!! : Arizona is fair weather fans....Cardinals games used to be a joke...now you can't get tickets. MY worthless .02 cents!
    3



king3500 Posted
(2009-06-19 18:52:04)

profile picture


The first thing is, you can't add teams, there is not enough quality talent at the NHL level. The product would be so watered down, the league would be a glorified AHL. I know hockey is king in southern Ontario, but adding another team there just isn't going to work. Kansas City or Winnipeg would be the idea places, if for anything, Geographical Locations, what are you going to do put the Hamilton team in the Western Conference or move Pittsburgh or Buffalo, not going to happen. Kansas City is a good sports town, it most likely would work there. As a hockey purest from the US, I believe that the league overextended itself into non-traditional markets in Florida and the southwest, I wish Quebec and Winnipeg were still in the League, but when those teams were for sale, there were no local buyers willing to buy the teams. Withe the migration of people from Canada and the Northern US, the NHL tried to market itself in the south and southwest, sometimes it works (Carolina), sometimes it doesn't (Phoenix), it is a gamble, and you don't always win when you gamble.
    1



robr_ducky Posted
(2009-06-19 18:11:38)



Yes, Cameltoeblake there is some truth and logic in what you are saying, and I probably took out my frustrations on you a little more than deserved. I've had the pleasure of catching hockey in the North (and soccer in Europe) and appreciate that it's more ingrained in those areas (less competition, etc). It just comes down to the same debate of whether or not it's in the NHL's best interest to move teams to smaller populated areas where there is a higher percentage of existing loyal fans. In a nutshell my argument is that you can't move all the baseball teams between Boston and New York because they are the most rabid/loyal fans. It would severely regionalize the sport and damage both of those two teams. We can all debate that left and right -- and I'm actually ok with a team in Hamilton, but haven't written off Phoenix yet. What I am tired about reading from the both the writers and commentors is that people in the desert or warm areas don't like or understand hockey. Southern California is mostly desert as is Dallas and hockey is thriving. In fact, we play both ice and rolley hockey all year long, and it's tough for us older guys to get decent times because the rinks are booked solid with youth teams (and in my area we probably have as many rinks in a ten mile radius as anywhere). It would be insanity for the NHL to leave the number two media market in North America but some people suggest exactly that. Similar numbers of kids are playing in Vegas and Phoenix but some act like all they do is herd cattle out on the range. These fans follow and post, but they post to websites that are more open to warm area fans. A handful of us are a little more stubborn.
    0



flyerfan52 Posted
(2009-06-19 17:07:40)



Reading gbgot2go's post made me wonder how he managed to string that many words together to make 0 sense. Boycott the TML, everyone in Canada outside the "Leaf Nation" would prefer not to be subjected to them. Boycott the stations that carry them? How would that make a difference to the CBC? Like it or not, if you pay taxes you're supporting them. Both they & TSN show some games not featuring TO & most like to watch those. FYI, no sucessful Canadian club has been moved south. Both Winnipeg & QC were bleeding money @ the time & there was no rich sugar daddy willing to take a chance on turning it around as both were also tied into bad lease deals that limited revenue to tickets sold only. If you're truely practising what you preach, shouldn't you be ignoring everything NHL related such as this site? You sound as hypocritical as Burke commenting on Heatley. tiny19, I agree on Milwaukee. I think that would have a very good chance of suceeding.
    0



cameltoeblake Posted
(2009-06-19 15:07:46)

profile picture


@robr_ducky - Being a Ducks fan from California, I can see why you would take offense to my comments. I appreciate that there are fans from the south like you who are frequenting this site in the offseason but face it you are in the minority. I'm not saying that there aren't any passionate fans in every market but the fact is hockey will always be a niche sport in some markets. I was also trying to make a point that in many of these markets, casual fans will only jump on the bandwagon when their local team is a winner but disappear during the bad times. That's the difference between the average Canadian and non traditional US fan. The Leafs would no longer have a license to print money if they were based in the States. Maybe you should jump on a plane and try to catch a game in Canada. MLB didn't work in Montreal or the NBA in Vancouver because there wasn't enough support and interest and those leagues aren't very concerned with tapping into these large markets. The NHL is trying to put teams in the most populated areas in hopes of securing tv deals and growing the game. How well are they doing with Versus? And they bend over backwards to schedule games just to accomodate NBC and then they cut to horseracing during a playoff game that went into overtime last year. How long can they let some of these teams bleed money and admit they made mistakes. BTW, before you start bragging about California youth teams beating us in tournaments, keep in mind that you are sending the best players from a region or state whereas places like the Greater Toronto area have numerous teams competing.
    0



1 2 3 4

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners