• Print

Judge rules against Jim Balsillie's bid to move Coyotes to Hamilton

Jim Balsillie co-CEO of RIM (Research In Motion) speaks to the media, May 25, 2009. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Dave Chidley

Zoom Image

Jim Balsillie co-CEO of RIM (Research In Motion) speaks to the media, May 25, 2009. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Dave Chidley

The NHL vowed to find an owner that will keep the Phoenix Coyotes where they are Monday night after an Arizona bankruptcy judge rejected Jim Balsillie's bold bid to buy the insolvent team and move it to Hamilton.

Judge Redfield T. Baum made his highly anticipated decision public earlier in the evening, saying in a 21-page ruling that there wasn't enough time to deal with all the unresolved issues raised by the unprecedented case.

That prompted Balsillie to offer the NHL an olive branch and propose to work with it in attempt to find "an appropriate" relocation fee to bring the club north through mediation.

But buoyed by the judgment, the league says it plans to help a future owner make the Coyotes viable in Glendale, and its claims that four parties have expressed an interest in operating the team there will now be put to the test.

"We are confident that we will be able to find such a buyer for the Coyotes," deputy commissioner Bill Daly said in a statement, "and that the claims of legitimate creditors will be addressed."

The ruling brings to a close more than a month of intense of often dramatic legal manoeuvring, set off when Balsillie sought to buy the Coyotes out of Chapter 11 protection with a US$212.5 million offer that was conditional on being able to move the team to Hamilton. He had set a June 29 closing date for the sale in an attempt to speed through the process and have the club in place for the 2009-10 season.

But Baum rejected that timeline and several aspects of the arguments made by his lawyers, writing their claims that the league's refusal to allow the team to move does not violate antitrust law and permit "the sale free and clear of the relocation rights of the NHL."

He noted how busy this time of year is for the league, pointing out that commissioner Gary Bettman left last Tuesday's court hearing in Phoenix to attend Game 6 of the Stanley Cup final in Pittsburgh, and that "relocation applications create significant issues that mandate careful consideration by all affected parties. ..."

"This court is unconvinced that it should order that the NHL must decide the relocation application to meet the June 29th deadline."

Toss in the need to figure out how much the relocation fee for moving the Coyotes to Hamilton and the looming auction set for June 22, and Baum felt that: "Simply put, the court does not think there is sufficient time (14 days) for all of these issues to be fairly presented to the court given that deadline."

Typically, the NHL and Balsillie didn't see eye-to-eye on the ruling.

The NHL, which had argued that his bid was designed to skirt rules on the transfer of ownership and relocation and should be rejected for that reason, said it was "pleased" the decision "recognized the validity of league rules and our ability to apply them in a reasonable fashion."

The potential buyers it floated in court documents - including Toronto Argonauts owners Howard Sokolowski and David Cynamon, and Chicago White Sox and Bulls owner Jerry Reinsdorf - now have the opportunity to take control of a franchise that has lost over $300 million since the Winnipeg Jets moved to the desert in 1996.

Balsillie, shot down in his third attempt to buy an NHL team, took heart that Baum noted the approval bestowed on him by the league's board of governors for his attempted purchase of the Pittsburgh Penguins in 2006, and the judge's statement that barring the relocation issue, "the NHL can not object or withhold its consent to (Balsillie) becoming the controlling owner of the Phoenix Coyotes."

That led Balsillie to ask the NHL to work through the relocation application he recently filed.

"Jim Balsillie's bid to bring a seventh NHL team to Canada continues," spokesman Bill Walker said in a statement. "We still think there is enough time for the NHL to approve Mr. Balsillie's application and move the team to Hamilton by September. The court invited mediation on these issues and Mr. Balsillie is willing to participate in such mediation if the NHL is also willing to do so."

Given the bitterness with which this saga played out, there's little chance of that.

Hamilton, which had lined up behind Balsillie and was ready to welcome him with open arms, still clung to hope that it won't end up a jilted bridesmaid once more, that its hopes of becoming home to a seventh Canadian NHL team falling short just like several other previous attempts.

"There's still a window of opportunity here," Hamilton mayor Fred Eisenberger told the Hamilton Spectator. "The issue is still very much alive. It doesn't mean relocation can't happen. I've always expected it to be a bit of a roller coaster ride and it certainly is."

The ride began May 5, when Coyotes owner Jerry Moyes surprised the NHL and filed for Chapter 11 protection.

Coyotes owner Jerry Moyes aligned with Balsillie against the NHL, hoping to recoup about $100 million of the $300 million he put into the club. He must now fight off league attempts to discredit him as a legitimate creditor, something it did in court filings for the case.

The city of Glendale, which spent $183 million to build an arena for the Coyotes and argued that the franchise could not use bankruptcy to escape its lease, will be relieved by the ruling, although it may be called upon to make concessions of up to $20 million annually to help keep the team around long term.

All the sides were on pins and needles waiting for a ruling that was expected last week after a nearly seven-hour hearing June 9 ended with Baum telling the parties he wanted to sleep on the matter before deciding how they should proceed.

Baum offered hints of where his thinking was at during the hearing when he said he believed the NHL was entitled to a relocation fee if the Coyotes are moved to Hamilton, and put the league on notice that it may be ordered to work quickly to determine exactly how much that would be.

There were suggestions the sides go to mediation for the matter, but Thursday the court issued a notice saying Baum "will not be setting a separate hearing on the relocation and fee issue. It will be dealt with in the court's ruling from the (June 9) hearing."

That raised speculation a decision was imminent.

The relocation fee became critical since it would eat away from the money available to creditors, making Balsillie's bid virtually worthless to them should he decide not to pay it.

One of the lawyers for the co-CEO of BlackBerry maker Research in Motion let slip during the hearing that they believe the NHL would charge $100 million for the move - a figure redacted from court documents and not confirmed by the league.

There may also have been some sort of indemnity fees demanded by or due to the Toronto Maple Leafs and Buffalo Sabres as compensation for the incursion into their territory, and it's unclear whether Balsillie would have been willing to ante up.

Richard Rodier, his representative, noted outside the courthouse last Tuesday that the deal allows Balsillie to walk away if there's a relocation fee, but the billionaire said in a statement Wednesday that he was one step closer to his goal of a seventh NHL team in Canada.

The NHL had steadfastly stuck to its view that there can be no relocation fee discussion until both an owner and the move have been approved by its governors.

COMMENTS (21)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


sharke Posted
(2009-06-17 11:56:13)



Anyone thought about how a team run by a guy who can't even shut his mouth or not act like a tool long enough to get what he wants will operate? Canada should get a 7th team and it should probably come from PHO, ATL, or FLA but they really don't need Balsillie as their champion.
    0



jeltz42 Posted
(2009-06-17 09:03:29)

profile picture


There is good and bad to this ruling. Hamilton did not need a team. The bad, the Phoenix creditors lost out on recouping some of their money and fans in Canada that can support the team lost out. Now would it matter if there were management and coaching changes in Phoenix? NO. There is nothing that will make the Coyotes a profitable team short of forcing money from the citizens or rigging the NHL profit sharing.
    0



adsfan01 Posted
(2009-06-16 18:52:45)

profile picture


nyr411, Balsillie already lost his chance to buy the Predators; they were bought by local Nashville businessmen. Balsillie won't be showing his bald head around Music City in the near future. I realize that the man wants to bring a team back to Canada, but, I agree with all those who say he's lost any credibility he might have had with the NHL and most NHL owners don't want him to join their circle. True, he should have just made a bid on a team and waited it out a year before making any attempts to move it, but he never made it secret that he wanted to purchase a team and move it to Southeastern Canada. If the NHL even entertained another expansion team, maybe he should try that route, I don't know. I do know that I'm betting that lots of hockey folks both in the US and in Canada are getting just a bit more tired of this guy each time he shows up at the door of a financially strapped NHL club.
    0



nyr411 Posted
(2009-06-16 17:43:26)

profile picture


Oh TOMCOTNER are you wrong. Me a Bettman fan? I'm a Rangers fan. He was an Islanders fan. He gave us that lockout to keep costs down and my Rangers have raised my ticket prices every year including this one. I live in a big market and we could buy any player except we have Glen Sather who got every old washed player he could find....ie: Redden(Yagr was the exception). You and that jerk Don Cherry pine for the days of Clarance Campbell as league President. He is the guy who sat right the Canadiens bench and never came to the United States. When your looney went south it was Bettman who used my American season ticket money to keep your teams in Canada. You liked him then and now when he doesn't let that billionaire Vulture steal teams from the United States to send them to Canada, you don't like him. The other owners don't care if Phoenix plays in Arizona or Hamilton. Give me a break. It's you who don't care about the poor fans in Phoenix who have supported this horrible team for years. Don't give them a chance with good ownership, let's ship them north.
    -1



penguins101 Posted
(2009-06-16 17:35:52)

profile picture


tomcotner : If Gretzky was anyone else other then the "Great One", he would have been fired by now. you know it, everyone knows it. 328-143-161 for a .473 record in 4 years with some over all decent players tells me the coach is not doing the job. I did think it through. This season was a really good example of a team tuning out the coach, remember where they were in the standings around the all star break? Where did they end up when the season was done? The Coyotes would be doing him, and the team, a favour by removing him as a coach, hiring somone else, there are a few good unemployed coaches out there, and maybe keep him on as an assistant. Bottom line, he just isn't cutting it as the head caoch.
    1



tomcotner Posted
(2009-06-16 15:59:31)

profile picture


PENGUINS 101: BOY OH BOY, You really need to think through your comments and thoughts. Regarding WAYNE GRETZKY, as I stated in a previous post, he's one of the bright spots for an otherwise dull topic; the demise of an NHL team. As with all coaching endeavors, there is a learning curve that needs to be addressed and procedurally followed, and I would think it would be clear in the minds of most that the WAYNER is a heckava lot better at the profession today, than when he assumed initial control of the team. For what he has had to work with in the past, he has made the most of his situation, and that team has been INSPIRED by the guy. All that said however, I still don't believe the COYOTES got any business being in PHOENIX in the 1st place, and that would be a loss for the teams players and the NHL, in general to lose GRETZKY as coach, since he made it clear that he was NOT going to follow the team to HAMILTON.
    0



tomcotner Posted
(2009-06-16 15:52:22)

profile picture


PENGUINS101:
    0



tomcotner Posted
(2009-06-16 15:50:44)

profile picture


NY411: YOUR COMMENTS CONTINUE TO SUGGEST THAT you are GARY BETTMAN in disguise !!! I can appreciate the decision made by JUDGE BAUM on this COYOTE ISSUE, in regard to the timeline that JIM BASILLE had hoped to accomplish. And other comments made by other posters who suggested that BASILLE take ownership of the desert dogs and operate the team in PHOENIX for a season, then move them to HAMILTON makes some sense as well. What doesn't make sense is that the little "UNDER THE BRIDGE TROLL," GARY BETTMAN is this morning smiling "LIKE THE BUTCHERS DOG," and his victory over BASILLE. Click yer heels, today, did cha BETTMAN ??? I still remember the `19,000 + REDWING fans who voiced their approval at your mere presence of handing out the CONN SMYTHE trophy to MALKIN. I'll always remember that scene, as it has been played out in the past and no doubt in the future. A suggestion was made that as a lawyer, BETTMAN is doing a fine job for his client owners, but other than the owners of the MAPLE LEAFS and the SABRES, why would any other owner(s) care if the COYOTE franchise played in PHOENIX, or HAMILTON ??? Eventually the day will come where the owners realize that BETTMAN is a mere LIABILITY for the SPORT and League. Maybe some do already !!!
    0



brianb23 Posted
(2009-06-16 11:31:46)

profile picture


ahahahaha! this guy is such an idiot, I'm so happy the court ruled against him. Am I against Canada having another team? No, of course not, even as an American I can see the value of hockey in canada, but this guy just makes me sick. Willow is absolutely right, he could have been a classy and business savvy person, bought the team, and then moved it after one last season in Phoenix. But no, he had to be a shady character, and complete moron with little sense of tact. Good job Basille! You're STILL not an NHL owner.
    6



willow1975 Posted
(2009-06-16 11:21:08)

profile picture


This is probably the best thing that could have happened. Like the judge stated there just wasn't enough time to get all the proceedings done in a timely matter. Plus there is the issue of scheduling and huge conflict of interest among the other teams in Western Conference. If Jim just simply bought the team without trying to force the relocation it would have probably been an entirely different scenario; one that probably would have worked in Jims' favour, if he would have waited till 2010-2011 to move the team.... Now this is all speculation so take it this with a grain of salt but this is what I think will happen... Since there is noticeable interest in the Hamilton area for an NHL team, a new owner will step in purchase a team (probably the Coyotes again or Panthers as they are losing the most money and are poorly run) and file all the necessary paperwork in a legal and professional matter to the NHL. The board of governors will accept the proposal and possible relocation if Copps Coliseum gets a massive upgrade that will support a professional team (which is to bad for the Bulldogs since they will be gone in a flash if the NHL moves in). On a side note there are other cities that I would like to see an NHL team in such as Seattle.
    3



1 2 3

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners