• Print

Screen Shots: Take Bettman out of Cup presentation

Nicklas Lidstrom of the Red Wings receives the Stanley Cup from Gary Bettman after defeating the Penguins in Game 6 of the 2008 Stanley Cup final. (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Nicklas Lidstrom of the Red Wings receives the Stanley Cup from Gary Bettman after defeating the Penguins in Game 6 of the 2008 Stanley Cup final. (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Indisputable Fact No. 1: The final game of the 2009 Stanley Cup final will begin Friday in Detroit.

Indisputable Fact No. 2:
There will be an NHL champion crowned Friday night, sometime Saturday, or if a lot of things go wrong, late Sunday afternoon.

Those are the only indisputable facts about Game 7 between the Red Wings and Pittsburgh Penguins. The showdown could be a clunker or a classic; it could be defined by a goaltending duel or a sloppy shoot-‘em-up; it could be decided by a masterpiece of a goal from Sidney Crosby or a shoveled-in rebound courtesy of Kris Draper.

So many potential permutations and complications, so little certainty. But wait – there is one more indisputable fact about the looming conclusion of the NHL’s post-season.

Indisputable Fact No. 3: When the game is over and Gary Bettman appears at center ice with a microphone in one hand and the Cup at his side, he will be booed.

Allow me to emphasize that for a second. The league commissioner will be booed long and booed hard. He will be booed as if he and he alone mismanaged Michigan’s automobile industry. At least one square mile of vocal chords in attendance will be blown out amid the Bronx cheering.

He won’t deserve all, or even most of the ill will, but the crowd will bestow a virtual beret of raspberries (and not the kind you find in a second-hand store) on him nonetheless. And that is my big problem whenever I see Bettman handing the Cup over to a championship team’s captain.

As I argued in the March 30th edition of The Hockey News magazine, with due respect to the NHL commissioner, that tradition ought to be mothballed right away.

In its place, the league would be wise to turn to its greatest strength – the players themselves – and implement a system wherein the Cup still gets awarded to the winning organization’s captain, only it gets awarded by the NHLer who captained the previous season’s champs.

Taking Bettman out of the equation could create a moment unique to mainstream team sports, in that it would combine the intimacy of the Masters’ green jacket ceremony with the communal manner in which the ‘C’-bearer represents his teammates, his city and his country.

When you remember the hockey icons who’ve been the first to take the Cup from a league representative – Steve Yzerman; Wayne Gretzky; Scott Stevens; Joe Sakic; Mark Messier – you realize what a golden marketing opportunity the NHL has been missing out on all this time.

Related Links

They still could seize it, though. One day down the line, they still could have Crosby passing the Cup to Jonathan Toews, or Roberto Luongo passing it to Mike Richards, or Jarome Iginla passing it to Daniel Alfredsson.

And as I said back in March, if there was a repeat Cup winner – as there could be at the end of Game 7 this year – you can find ways to make the ceremony even more extraordinary.

The trick there is to allow the two-time champs to decide which organizational representative would hold the Cup and deliver it back into the hands of the captain. So, for example, if the Red Wings manage to outlast the Penguins and complete the repeat this weekend, they could choose a legendary former player (Ted Lindsay, Gordie Howe, Vladimir Konstantinov) to present the trophy to Nicklas Lidstrom.

What a breath-taking, tear-producing, exquisite scene that would be. And what a contrast to the sterile, corporate picture that gets painted each year Bettman is the one sharing the spotlight.

The commissioner could hammer a couple dents out of his battered hull of an image if he willingly took it upon himself to step back and return the whole focus to the players.

Until he does, he’s going to be jeered like a children’s villain every time he rolls out on that red carpet. And as long as that is the case, the league, players and sport will continue to have a potentially iconic image subverted by second-rate treatment for the sake of a tradition whose usefulness has long since expired.

Adam Proteau, co-author of the book The Top 60 Since 1967, is writer and columnist for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Mondays, his Ask Adam feature appears Fridays and his column, Screen Shots, appears Thursdays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (37)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


johnz96 Posted
(2009-08-05 15:55:04)



They booed him at the draft too. What a joke the NHL is obviously does not care about the fans maybe if they did the NHL wouldn't be by far the least popular major sports league in N.A.
    1



stlchigirl Posted
(2009-07-05 22:12:19)

profile picture


I agree with the sentiment and argument of this article, as well as for giving me a chuckle with the following sentence,"the crowd will bestow a virtual beret of raspberries (and not the kind you find in a second-hand store) on him nonetheless"
    1



pucksdeep Posted
(2009-06-17 02:46:32)

profile picture


Agreed Adam. The greatest trophy in sports should not be subjected to such rampant boos during its presentation. Of course, it remains every hockey fan's duty to vigorously boo Bettman at every opportunity. So, the only logical solution is indeed to give Bettman the boot. Imagine Gordie Howe presenting Lord Stanley? That would be awesome. The only thing better would be watching a greying Mr. Hockey pummel that tiny egomaniac Bettman, wrest the Cup from his feeble grasp, and then present it to the captain of the new champs. I bet you'd hear some cheering then.
    1



johnz96 Posted
(2009-06-17 02:09:22)



hope they give him a rude welcome on draft day.
    1



martinex Posted
(2009-06-17 01:10:15)



Bettman is a complete tool. He single handedly destroyed the players union. The NHL on Versus guarantees that only Ted Nugent fans will get to see a hockey game for the forseeable future (why does this channel exist?). The online package is riduculously over priced (how can you charge comparable prices for watching a game on the internet? The DirecTV package only costs a few dollars more! Suckers who suscribed to the the DTV package should get a substantial discount on the internet service, infact it should be free.). I thought the idea was to attract more fans not drive the few remaining away. I used to attend 10 games a year but I'll be damned if I'm going to spend 400 dollars to take my nephew to an Islanders game (still sucking after all these years). The finals proved that Hockey is the greatest sport on earth. Name any other sport where guys play harder for a tin cup. Too bad most people south of the Canadian Border will rarely get to see it. P.S. Dear NBC thanks for not pre-empting the playoffs with horse racing this year. More telecasts please.
    3



johnz96 Posted
(2009-06-16 02:36:24)



i have never heard or read anyone say anything positive about bettman no one seems to like him. we should not only take him out of the cup presentation but take him out of the nhl altogether. he deserves all the booing and some.how ignorant of him stubbornly continue to impose himself on all us fans when we obviously dont want him there. can we as fans start a petition? how do we dispose of him? why are the goalie gloves so big still? i am sure bettman must be somehow responsible. are they catching pucks or large mouth bass? it was a shame to see all that talent trying to prevent goals rather than score them in the finals. that was due to the officiating and big goalie glovesd(and equipment) once again rules were left up to the discretion of referees while players and coaches try to figure it out each night. ron maclean once put grant fuhrs entire catching glove in the pocket of one used today. the penguins won the cup averaging 2(2 of them were empty net) goals a game in the finals.
    1



zhkyman Posted
(2009-06-14 12:22:12)

profile picture


OR - Have the most recient Hall of Fame inductees present the cup to the capt. of the winning team. After a brief presentation or video clip of how significant the stanley cup is (for new hockey fans). I agree Bettman should not touch it. He has a long list of miscues that have turned many people away from the sport. I also agree that finals announcers should be neutral, not having any ties to the teams on the ice. The last two years we could not listen to the TV - sound off and listen to the radio, Bring back Thorne and Clement.
    1



steve_ghb Posted
(2009-06-13 16:13:20)

profile picture


I dont remember the last time a team has won the cup on home ice, did the fans really boo all the way through the cup ceremony? I find that hard to believe. I know if my team won and I was in the arena I would cheer my a** off no matter who gave them the cup. Seems stupid to stop your incredible celebration to boo a stiff like Bettman, I think last year's winner presenting to the current winner is just a dumb idea. I think each team should be able to pick who they want to present it to them.
    0



seattlemetropolitans Posted
(2009-06-13 08:18:43)



You couldn't even hear Bettman this year. The fans were to busy booing him..lol.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kO4EJeO3KjM
    1



dave1927p Posted
(2009-06-12 23:41:48)



johnd9207, i agree, but not a "commissoner", a "President" :)
    0



1 2 3 4

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners