• Print

The Hockey News 2009 Stanley Cup Preview

Zoom Image

The grueling journey for the Stanley Cup is almost over. Just two teams remain – and they’re awfully familiar with each other.

The Pittsburgh Penguins and Detroit Red Wings will clash in the final for the second straight year, the first time since 1983-84 there has been a repeat in opponents (Islanders-Edmonton).

Through three rounds, our predictions here at THN.com have been pretty spot-on. Thanks to a conference finals sweep, we head into the Cup with a 10-4 record.

Can the Wings go back-to-back or will the Penguins take the first step towards their dynasty?

In seven games or less the answer awaits, but here’s how we see it going down.

Detroit Red Wings DETROIT RED WINGS vs. PITTSBURGH PENGUINS Pittsburgh Penguins

SEASON SERIES
Detroit - 1-0-1 (9 GF, 7 GA)
Pittsburgh - 1-1-0 (7 GF, 9 GA)

LEADING SCORER VS. OPPONENT
Detroit - Jiri Hudler and Marian Hossa 3 (2G, 1A)
Pittsburgh - Jordan Staal 4 (3G, 1A)

SPECIAL TEAMS
Unless one of these two teams plays entirely out of character, special teams aren’t likely to be an enormous factor. And that’s probably good news for the Red Wings, whose penalty-killing has been uncharacteristically atrocious in the post-season, giving up 15 power play goals in 57 opportunities and sitting near the bottom of the heap among playoff teams in that category. Both squads, however, have been incredibly well-behaved throughout the playoffs and don’t take stupid or lazy penalties, which, for some reason, seem to be the hardest ones to kill. Detroit’s power play has been better than Pittsburgh’s, but their penalty-killing shortcomings will keep them honest. Edge: Pittsburgh

FORWARDS
At first blush, you’d look at what Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin have done in this year’s playoffs and make this category a slam-dunk for Pittsburgh, but have you noticed that the Red Wings have averaged almost 40 shots a game through the playoffs so far? The Penguins forward ranks are top-heavy with superstars who are playing like superstars, along with some role players who are making some timely contributions. The Red Wings, on the other hand, have a band of brothers on their four lines that, on any given night, have the potential to make life miserable for their opponent. Crosby seemed to get away from the shoot-first mentality that made him such a force in the second round, but if he and Malkin continue their level of play, the Red Wings defense will have all it can handle. Edge: Even

DEFENSE
The Penguins have received some yeomen’s work from a defense corps that is a little underappreciated and has held up quite well, but this is one area of the game where the Red Wings have an enormous advantage – if their defensemen are all healthy. Jonathan Ericsson having surgery on his appendix prior to Game 5 of the Western Conference final was a surprise and the Red Wings have to be concerned about how effective Nicklas Lidstrom will be. But they have a couple of days to recover and, if healthy, have an all-round game that the Penguins can’t match. Edge: Detroit

Related Links

GOALTENDING
Marc-Andre Fleury was lights-out in Game 4 of the Penguins sweep of Carolina and is gaining traction as one of the top goalies in the game. Chris Osgood continues to defy all laws of logic that suggest a player simply can’t just turn it on once the playoffs begin. He has been a pillar on a team that needs its goalie to only be good, not great. But the fact of the matter is the Red Wings and Penguins have given up almost exactly the same number of shots per game in this year’s playoffs and Osgood has been statistically better than Fleury in every department. Edge: Detroit

COACHING
There’s an interesting little back story here. Dan Bylsma was a utility forward on the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim back in 2003 when they lost the Cup final in seven games to the New Jersey Devils. The coach of that Ducks team? Mike Babcock, of course. Babcock earned his stripes as an NHL coach a long time ago and remains one of the top bench bosses in the league, both in terms of preparing his team and making adjustments during games and series. Bylsma has done almost everything right since taking over the Penguins, going a combined 30-8-4 in the regular season and the playoffs so far. But Babcock’s experience probably tilts the ice in his favor. Edge: Detroit

THE X-FACTOR
When these two teams met for the first time this season back in November, the Penguins trailed by two goals with less than five minutes remaining, but ended up winning the game in overtime. You get the sense the Pens really wanted a rematch with the Red Wings and feel they’re much better equipped to beat them than they were last year. And they are. Both teams had the benefit of a relatively easy conference final and are at the top of their games. To be sure, the final has the potential to be the most entertaining we’ve seen in years, and that’s actually saying something.

PREDICTION
There are some parallels between this series and 1984, when the Edmonton Oilers faced the New York Islanders in the final for the second straight spring and won the Stanley Cup. The only difference – and it’s a major one - is the Islanders were a dynasty in demise and the Red Wings are a dynasty that is showing no signs of slowing down. In fact, they’re getting better. The reality is this is a pick ‘em series and we’re picking the champs to repeat. In the end, experience, poise and home ice advantage will be the deciding factors in the series. Detroit in seven.

Who do you think will win? Vote HERE.

COMMENTS (35)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


tiny19 Posted
(2009-05-31 04:02:17)



@Lump- How could you leave out Grandpa Chelios in your timeline. He's one of the few remaining from the Mesolithic Era.
    -1



devouringlump Posted
(2009-05-30 18:25:55)

profile picture


It's great that this series features some of the best players from each hockey generation. Crosby and Malkin in their early twenties, Zetterberg, Hossa and (hopefully later in the series) Datsyuk each at or approaching 30, and then the great late-30's players: Lidstrom, Gonchar, Rafalski (who I think is really underrated) and Osgood. Should be fun.
    0



whatisthatsmell Posted
(2009-05-30 16:08:27)

profile picture


I don't think anyone who isn't a diehard Pens fan has to pick Detroit to win again. Detroit is gonna light Fleury up.
    0



sean_miller Posted
(2009-05-30 02:24:34)



@lumpy and steve - let's never again speak of the St Louis Blues' appearances in the Stanley Cup Final. Based on the schedule and set up of the playoffs for the expansion teams, all their appearances should have giant asterixes (asterices?).
    0



juss76 Posted
(2009-05-30 01:35:13)

profile picture


Pens in five!
    -1



brm999 Posted
(2009-05-29 22:48:31)

profile picture


When I talk to people about this series I keep noticing that they all think the pens are going to win just because it's their second trip. As if they should just hand the cup over to them because they made it a second year because Detroit has no hope. I've got news for you people. The east is a weak conference and the Wings are still a deeper team. That have an umatched wealth of expericne that certainly tops Crosby's four year stint. The Wings may be a little more tired from the Anahiem series but they are still the better team. If the stars can't get it done, then somebody else will. I'm sure Malkin will show up this year and Crosby will be better but it won't be enough. Pens in 5 is a retarded statement. Wings in 7.
    1



onlyoneteaminny Posted
(2009-05-29 21:15:48)



these are two totally different teams from last years final. Detroit have been flat while the penguins are red hot. Penguins in 5.
    -2



devouringlump Posted
(2009-05-29 19:09:13)

profile picture


@scubasteve - that's pretty loose to say he won two cups with the Pens. He was basically a consultant in 91. But all the way back to the Blues days, his best offensive players got it done when it mattered. They didn't get to the cup finals without Berenson putting pucks in the back of the net when it mattered. Sure you had guys like Moore and Keenan add timely offense, but he expected his best offensive players to score in the playoffs. Are you suggesting Yzerman didn't step up with the offensive numbers?!? Did you miss those games too?
    0



holymanm Posted
(2009-05-29 17:59:51)

profile picture


I'm not entirely sure how it's possible to pick Malkin as a playoff MVP over Crosby... maybe I've been watching the wrong playoffs?
    -2



chuck_menofalls Posted
(2009-05-29 17:51:35)

profile picture


@scuba ... it's entirely possible he's not even aware of the coach you're referring to? The mindset of "the boxscore is all that matters" is emblematic of the shock happy feet went through in games 1 and 2 last year. When your world revolves around offense I'm sure it's stunning in your first encounter with an actual defense. It will be a good seriers, even with my fear that NBC has influenced the outcome. That said, to be champion, you have to overcome some obstacles ... and at this point, there's only one champion in this equation. Go Wings!
    2



1 2 3 4

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
This Week - Subscribe Now

Who will win the Stanley Cup in 2010-11?












"There's excitement in him; he's champing at the bit. You can see it in him and hear it in him. Last year there was a dark cloud over him."

- Minnesota Wild coach Todd Richards on forward Pierre-Marc Bouchard, who missed all but one game last season with post concussion syndrome.

Our Partners