• Print

THN.com Playoff Blog: Devils, Wings wins show why penalties are precious

Martin Brodeur of the New Jersey Devils was the star of Game 5 against the Carolina Hurricanes turning away all 44 shots he faced. (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Martin Brodeur of the New Jersey Devils was the star of Game 5 against the Carolina Hurricanes turning away all 44 shots he faced. (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)

Whoever said a 1-0 hockey game is a painful one to watch never saw a playoff game at its pinnacle.

Hockey is about earning your position on the ice. Before you can start a rush you have to gain puck possession; before you form an attack you have to fight it out of your zone; and before you can score a goal on a playoff-tested goalie – which we have two of in the Carolina-New Jersey series – you have to battle your way to the front of the net.

The goalie-interference feud from Game 4 carried over to the early-goings of Game 5. Tensions were heightened because of the way the series-tying goal was scored, but Jussi Jokinen’s goal was fair. Brodeur was out of his crease and wasn’t charged at for contact, but merely nudged by a player trying to gain position on the white crease-side ice; after all that’s high-value real estate.

And because of the stringent cutbacks to the apparently heinous act of physical contact, defensemen feel guilty for playing tough with the attacking player in front of the net, so the attacker feels he has more countryside to roam and take advantage of, thus cottages are built on the shores of the crease and there’s a more active presence around the goalie.

There’s a valuable lesson hockey teaches that is simple: struggle, but overcome and achieve. This is what winning the Stanley Cup is all about and is what won the game for the Devils Thursday to give them a lead in a series that has been all about great battles.

After David Clarkson got a deserved penalty for a flagrant attempt at obstruction on Cam Ward – not a battle for positioning – Chad LaRose followed it up with an iffy hit on Brodeur where LaRose’s skate actually cut the goalie. Instead of carrying over his frustration from the game before, though, Brodeur did what the best do and kept playing the game with his determined head down.

It’s why he’s among the all-time greats and his shutout in this game to give the Devils a 3-2 series lead earned him another milestone: tying Patrick Roy for the playoff shutout lead.

The referees will no doubt be ridiculed, but they should be commended for allowing such a traditional game of battle-tested teams breathe instead of bogging it down with power plays that are becoming all too common in this day in age.

In Columbus, the interference problem arose again, this time against young Steve Mason. When Tomas Holmstrom was downed in the crease, Mason was unable to gain proper positioning until Holmstrom got up. Mason had time to regain proper positioning if he was determined to do so, but seemed pre-occupied with frustration and the Wings took advantage.

Related Links

Columbus’ secondary scoring finally got started in Game 4, but it was too little too late as the Wings answered them goal for goal and scored the game-winner with less than a minute left on, yes, the power play.

Whatever issue the Columbus lobby has against that penalty call is a futile point, anyway, because the series wasn’t lost on that penalty call, it was lost in the three games prior.

I’m having a tough time swallowing some of these games – especially in overtime – that end on the power play, though. The game needs to be decided by the players and not the whistles, which is why refs need to be allowed to have discretion.

Back when I reffed minor hockey in Ontario, I’ll never forget the first time I wore the stripes for a playoff game. It was tied late and I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t at least a little nervous as one team called a timeout. My supervisor, who was working as the linesman, came up to me and asked me how I felt.

“Good,” I said. “But a little nervous.”

“Don’t worry,” he answered. “This is the easy part, all you have to do is put your whistle away unless they take away a wide open scoring chance.”

And that’s how playoff hockey should be decided, by the players, not the whistles. Enough with these late-game and overtime stick penalties during broken plays. This is the playoffs, folks. It’s time to man up and push through.

After all, the Stanley Cup is supposed to be the toughest trophy to win.

Show off your hockey knowledge by entering The Hockey News’ FREE Playoff Challenge!

THN.com's Playoff Blogs, featuring analysis and opinion on the action from the night before and the games ahead, with insight on what happened and what it all means going forward, will appear daily throughout the NHL playoffs. Read more entries HERE.

Rory Boylen is TheHockeyNews.com's web content specialist and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Tuesdays and his feature, A Scout's Life, appears Thursdays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (37)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


barclay donaldson Posted
(2009-04-30 08:30:47)



BioImplant, have you ever watched a playoff basketball game? Or seen a video of the "Immaculate Reception"? And if you want to try to tell me that Dodgers and Yankees pitchers don't benefit from an enlarged strike zone come playoff time, I'm all ears...
    0



Rob Posted
(2009-04-30 08:30:23)



@tiny19 I didn't really imply what my preferences were ... I laid them out clearly in three long posts. I'm a "just let them play" kind of guy who thinks the third period in a tight game should be a little looser, and the benefit of the doubt in any playoff game goes to the home ice team (why keeping home ice is important). I could swear that those used to be the underlying guidelines for years and years and now I'm not so sure. I think Columbus got jobbed in that last call for the above reasons. By the way, my comparison was on power play opportunities not penalty minutes which just-for-the-fun-of-it we'll look at again after the next series.
    0



Tiny19 Posted
(2009-04-30 08:30:17)



Thanks for getting to the heart of the matter. You feel that the Wings don't get enough penalties called on them. Yet, you are using the arguement of let em play and keep the whistle in the pocket. Your flip-flopping on your own arguement. You just can't be happy can you. If you look at the games, In games 1 and 3 the Wings had more penalties. Where the differential took over was in game 2. The Wings had 4 and the Jackets 13. That's including the double minor to Vermette and the 10 minute misconduct for Commodore. If you recall, the Jackets played a game with really poor discipline and the Wings took advantage of that. I kind of agree with you on the Gretzky rules for some players but I don't think that you can say truthfully that the Wings get every call. Some times outworking a player means making them take a penalty. And that is one thing that they do well, out work their opponents. And if you want to argue legacy calls, your 2nd favorite teams # 96 takes nearly as many as your favorite teams # 25, and more than half of both aren't deserved. Actually, your #1 team gets way to many Legacy calls if you ask me. I do understand your frustration. That's just how I feel man. Don't want to start a war.
    0



Tiny19 Posted
(2009-04-30 08:30:17)



That last post was directed towards Rob. Sorry I left that out.
    0



Tiny19 Posted
(2009-04-30 08:30:17)



Rory Boylen- Please don't go thinking that Holmstrom was interfering with Mason. Dan O'Halloran was on the ice and if there was any hint of interference, he would be more than happy to pull the whistle out of his pocket. He has quite a history of that.... And as a "former" referee I would think that you would understand the difference between a "personal" foul and a "fundemental" foul. We learn in Mites, that only 6 players at a time are allowed on the ice. While you can look away at body fouls, This is fundemental hockey.
    0



Tiny19 Posted
(2009-04-30 08:30:17)



Bukihockey- You might want to update your rulebook. The Brett Hull ( No Goal ) rule has been gone for a little while now. Rule 69 in the NHL rule book explains goaltender interference in depth.
    0



BioImplant Posted
(2009-04-30 08:30:12)



This is one of the things about this sport that put off so many people. A lot of people can't understand changing or relaxing the rules for the playoffs. No other major sport does this. The call cannot be questioned. What I would do is question the CBJ. Just a few minutes left in the game. Possibly the premature end of such a histiric,pivital game (new team, first time to the PO) and the last guy off drags his @$$. My grandmother can move faster! It was right up there with that clown that couldn't stay out of the RW bench. Same player seconds later trying to beat up a wing all the while his team is being scored on. Total lack of focus in his defensive zone. Commies a goon anyway. And the article has it wrong. The CBJ matched the wings goal for goal, not the other way around. The RW never trailed.
    0



Rob Posted
(2009-04-30 08:30:08)



Yes, Fred I am serious, and by the way Detroit is my second favorite team (and I actually don't root for Columbus at all). I don't think Detroit would have won the series ... I pretty much know they would have. That's actually irrelevent to this discussion, though, this game shouldn't have been decided in this manner. There are some strong arguments about the puck being played, and players need to be smarter for sure, but a lot more was not called in this game in this period. At Columbus, late in the third, when there was already a large penalty differential? A part of me wishes this stuff didn't matter but it usually does effect what calls are made down the stretch. My comments really didn't have anything to do with Detroit, but now that you mention it, let's just see what the power play differential ends up after round 2 (this one was 23 - 13). The talent and playoff experience differential will probably be a little closer in round two.
    0



P H Posted
(2009-04-30 08:30:07)



Oh and btw, had he not played the puck it probably would have been icing. Stupid penalty.
    0



sean miller Posted
(2009-04-30 08:30:06)



@T.Roy - I assume you are addressing another Mr. Miller - or you don't read good. @Snowman - your team lost - suck it up and learn from your mistakes.
    0



1 2 3 4

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners