• Print

Campbell's Cuts: Renney takes fall for Sather's mistakes

Tom Renney has led the Rangers to a 31-23-7 record this season. (Photo by Andy Marlin/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Tom Renney has led the Rangers to a 31-23-7 record this season. (Photo by Andy Marlin/NHLI via Getty Images)

John Tortorella recently had his cell phone number changed to one with a 416 area code, no doubt so his employers at TSN would have easy access to him. That way, it would be a quick, local call for them to get Tortorella’s unique brand of sunshine.

In the next day or so Tortorella will be changing his area code to 212 or 647 or whatever it is for cell phones in New York.

In what is an ironic reversal of fortunes, Rangers GM Glen Sather is expected to make Tortorella the Rangers next coach, the same man he bought out as a Rangers assistant and allowed to go to Tampa Bay almost a decade ago.

That was the start of a scorched-earth policy under the auspices of Sather that has produced two playoff round victories in seven years and nothing even close to a Stanley Cup. It continues today as another good man and good coach, this time Tom Renney – actually two good men if you include highly competent assistant coach Perry Pearn, who was also whacked by Sather – pays for a series of incompetent moves by an alleged Hall of Fame GM.

In fact, you could easily argue that Renney has been the best coach the Rangers have had since Colin Campbell, who last was behind the Rangers bench 11 years ago. He communicated well with the players, got the most out of many of them, including Jaromir Jagr, and instilled in the team a system of disciplined defensive play.

But the fish rots from the head down and that’s the case with the Rangers. Like most unsuccessful organizations, they are top-heavy with problems starting with a meddlesome chairman and then moving down to Sather, whose philosophy since joining the Rangers in 2000 is to throw money around and see what works.

If you look at the Rangers roster, it’s pretty easy to see why they’ve scored only 20 goals in their past 12 games. Last season, Sather lost Jagr, Brendan Shanahan and Martin Straka and replaced them with Markus Naslund, Nikolai Zherdev and Aaron Voros. That’s 62 goals and 158 points gone, replaced by three players who so far have scored 42 goals and 96 points.

The Rangers couldn’t, or wouldn’t, bring back Jagr or Shanahan, but found $6.5 million in salary cap money for Wade Redden, a player who was clearly on the decline given his play with the Ottawa Senators the past couple of seasons. His foot speed has diminished, he plays a passive game and the faithful at Madison Square Garden seem intent on shattering any confidence he might have once had.

Related Links

Bad signing. But there have been a lot of those under Sather’s watch. For example, why did Sather see the need to burn up $14.4 million in salary cap space to sign both Scott Gomez and Chris Drury two summers ago? What the Rangers effectively did was use up about a quarter of their cap space on two second-line centers, neither one of which has ever had a history of scoring goals.

Gomez is a set-up man and Drury is the consummate leader with a history for coming through in the clutch, but neither was worth the money and by paying them what he did, Sather created an expectation for both players that neither could match.

Of course, that’s nothing new for Sather, who whined about having no money in Edmonton then acted like a sailor on shore leave once he ran into it with the Rangers. Here’s a guy who took what everyone in hockey knew was a third-line center in Bobby Holik and paid him first-line money, then people wondered why Holik didn’t produce once he started drawing a huge salary.

It’s because players don’t change, expectations do. Those expectations are created by GMs such as Sather, who pay players far more than they’re worth.

Anyone who has talked to Renney over the years can see he’s an insightful, intelligent hockey guy. Sometimes he uses eight words when two will do, but there is no denying he can coach. Renney was stuck in a bad situation by a GM whose roster construction skills left a lot to be desired and actually made himself an easy target by being a good guy.

As one industry observer noted, Renney’s biggest problem was that, “he couldn’t be an a—hole.”

No problem there with the new guy.

Ken Campbell, author of the book Habs Heroes, is a senior writer for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Wednesday and Fridays and his column, Campbell's Cuts, appears Mondays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (64)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


JOhn Ramacca Posted
(2009-04-30 08:03:25)



You;re right Naddad, Ranger fans are not front runners. They are more like masochisitc dogs. The Rangers management know they don't have to win. The fans will take their annual punch in the stomach and come back next year and pay even more to watch Messier weep. Just like a dog that doesnt know he's being abused. The only way to get through to the Ranger's management is to hurt them in the wallet. They wont listen to you letters or care about the signs you hold up at games. If you won't vote with your dollars, you can watch a team full of play makers with no goal scorers for another year. Enjoy Avery (good for ticket sales) but not likely to get far in the playoffs. I do stand by my comment about tourists. NYC is the most visited city in the world and MSG is the most visited sporting arena in the world.
    0



Naddad Posted
(2009-04-30 08:00:03)



John R - So your idea of "substance" is to make general statements ... like fans in the lower bowl of MSG being merely "tourists" and not true Rangers fans? Did you do some kind of scientific research that backs your claim? ... Talk about fluff.
    0



Naddad Posted
(2009-04-30 08:00:00)



John R - Your comment that the people who sit in the lower bowl at MSG are all "tourists" not only is inaccurate, but silly. What, the Islanders sold no season-ticket packages whatsoever to corporations? Please. You're embarrassing yourself. But then, the Islanders are an embarrassment of a franchise who play in the Mausoleum. Good luck with DP's 15-year contract. LOL
    0



John Ramacca Posted
(2009-04-30 07:59:43)



Ranger57, I have no idea what you are talking about. The Rangers sell tickets because of the location of their building, not the support of their fans. If the Nassau Coliseum was located in the most visited city in the world and the financial capitol of the world they would sell just as well as the Rangers. The Knicks suck and they sell out every game. You say I obviously do not know what I am talking about, yet you failed to mention which of the comments I made was wrong. You said that I am trying to justify why islander fans do not support their team, but my argument is that there are as many Islander fans at an Islander game than there are Ranger fans at a Ranger game. If you take out the tourists and the visiting businessmen the attendance at a Ranger game is no different from the attendance at an Islander game. I went to a Ranger game not long ago while visiting NYC and I had a choice of affordable seats when I got to the ticket window. When I got inside there were a surprising number of empty seats up high. The lower seats were pretty full during the second period but not so full in the first or third. Where do you get your sellout season data from. Perhaps I could look at it and explain why the Islanders have not had any. Maybe there was a blizzard that year, who knows. You have made many statements about what you think I do and what could happen and tainted it all with your bias but you did not address any of the facts. You dismissed them but did not address them. Typical Ranger fan, lots of fluff and insults but no substance. Is that caused by your overwhelming amount of loyalty?
    0



John Ramacca Posted
(2009-04-30 07:59:43)



Ranger57, you still have not explained what makes you think the Ranger fans are more loyal than Islander fans, other than the fact that tourists buy tickets and act like fans and because you LOVE HOCKEY which is non-measurable fluff. What else? And what is an Icelander?
    0



bill from brookhaven Posted
(2009-04-30 07:59:30)



Perry Pern ,nice guy? yes!, But POWER PLAY COACH?C'mon there has been absolutely NO inprovement in that catagorie for all the time he has been in charge of it! When is the last time SAM has shouted" It's a power play goal with any regularity? and how can a team have a shorthanded unit That allows ZILCH and a power play unit that gets ZILCH? ALSO after allowing a league leading 12 short handed goals against RENNY puts 4 forwards on the PP unit.......
    0



Rangers57 Posted
(2009-04-30 07:59:29)



John Ramacca, It's quite evident by your posting that you have NO Idea what you are talking about. You are TRYING to justify why the Icelander fans don't support their team. Well news for you here, they don't support their team because they don't have the passion, heart and diseire for the game. You are the typical Icelander fan that always blames some other circumstance for the Icelanders failure! When you talk about FAN LOYALITY, don't even mention the word Icelander fans in the same sentence because there isn't any there and never has been. Most if not all Icelander fans can't and don't see past their own propaganda and bias. Icelander fans supporting their team, don't make me LAUGH! Your statement that Icelander fans won't pay to see a sub-par team just proves my point, some backing and support for your team. That's what makes RANGER FANS and Icelander fans totally different, WE LOVE HOCKEY and will support our team through GOOD times and (so far mostly) bad times. But we are there for the game of Hockey and for Our TEAM! You CRY about all the bad/lousy decisions that either Icelander management or G.M.'s have made and about trading away players/draft choices. Well we have had the same but for a longer period. Your reasons for Icelander fans NOT filling their own arena is nothing but LAUGHABLE! You state that Msg is filled with Corporate seats, guests, Manhattan businesses, and your right. The Icelander seats are EMPTY! If you are a TRUE Icelander supporter and have a true love for hockey explain to me this! During their entire existance, the Icelanders have NEVER (repeat NEVER) had a SELL OUT SEASON in their history! Not even during their 4-Cup (DYNASTY)! You people didn' support your team when they where winning, so you EXCUSES for NOT supporting them in their bad times sounds nothing more than SOUR GRAPES! You Icelander fan/supporters don't know how to support a team through good times and bad, you only want to support a winner and can't take the losing times. ICELANDERS HOCKEY FANS, I THINK NOT, NOT EVEN CLOSE. Your kind of support will possibly (but I hope NOT) just cost you your team. How many more years will Wang keep dumping and losing money into an foundering organization before he either sells it or moves it. Not many more. Their are many cities in North American that are just biting at the bit to get an NHL team. But you keep up to your blind non-support and (1) morning you will wake up only to find you HAVE NO TEAM AT ALL!
    0



Rangers57 Posted
(2009-04-30 07:59:29)



While I think that Renney is a good/decent coach, he fell into the Savard(Chicago) hole. He did NOT have what it takes to have the Rangers advance any further. He had to go! A good coach has to read his team, and recogonize when something isn't working and change! This Renney could NOT see and was too Stubborn to change! I also must say that we have (2) down and (1) to go! NEXT FIRE SATHER, but that may be a little harder as hw is DOLANS BOY TOY! I can only hope the with the coaching changes that something changes with this team, if not for this year then hopefully next! Time will Tell!
    0



whatsthatsmell Posted
(2009-04-30 07:59:24)



The Rangers are still in the playoffs. It's not time to hit the panic button yet. A new coach might just be the spark they need to finish the season strong and go deep in the playoffs. Torts has a lot of experience, and won a Stanley Cup with a team that is not as talented as what he has here. This could be the best thing to happen to the Rangers. Renney was great, but if the team doesn't click with the coach, it's easier to get rid of the coach than it is to get rid of the team.
    0



Moon Knight Posted
(2009-04-30 07:59:22)



I've always thought making Gomez and Drury important centrepieces for this team was a mistake. Gomez is a playmaker who refuses to shoot (he has a 34 goal season but the rest of the time can't get to 20) and Drury, while a gritty two-way player who can score goals - does not make players around him better. His goal totals range from 25 to 35 but his assists are always pretty low. Gomez needs TWO big finishers to play with. And if Gomez's line is high-scoring than the offense Drury chips in would be in line with his abilities - secondary scoring. PLaying the two together is almost completely useless. Pretty much no other team in the higher half of scoring bases their offense on such a strange combination - even Atlanta's forwards produce goals more efficiently. The Rangers are probably stuck with those two for awhile but neither's going to be very effective until at least one pure sniper arrives. So i agree that the team's problems were Sather's fault and not Renney's.
    0



1 2 3 4 5 6 7

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners