• Print

Campbell's Cuts: Ups and downs of the plus-minus

Marc Savard of the Boston Bruins has 52 points and is a plus-29 in 42 games this season. (Photo by Gregg Forwerck/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Marc Savard of the Boston Bruins has 52 points and is a plus-29 in 42 games this season. (Photo by Gregg Forwerck/NHLI via Getty Images)

When you look at the plus-minus rankings this season, there are some shocking names at both ends of the list.

At the top is Marc Savard of the Boston Bruins at plus-29. Savard has long been regarded as a defensive liability and has been a plus player only twice during his career, but things have changed in a huge way for him. Savard has never been better than plus-7, but has been on the ice for 48 even-strength goals this season, which is third in the league behind teammates Dennis Wideman (51) and Zdeno Chara (49).

But the real shock comes at the bottom of the league. Currently occupying 795th overall and the top contender for the green jacket is Carolina Hurricanes center Rod Brind’Amour at minus-27; a two-time winner of the Selke Trophy as the league’s top defensive forward and a guy generally regarded as one of the most disciplined and conscientious players in the league.

So is this a true reflection of their play this season or one of the vagaries of one of the most maligned statistics in NHL history? Well, probably a little of both.

Some people don’t pay any attention to plus-minus because in many ways it has too much to do with how good or bad the player’s team is. Where it does tell something, though, is when one player is out of whack with the rest of his team. Niclas Havelid being plus-7 on an Atlanta Thrashers team that has given up the most goals in the league tells you something.

So does Brind’Amour’s plus-minus. While the Hurricanes won’t ever be confused with the 1977-78 Montreal Canadiens, they’re not that bad. What makes his plus-minus a telling stat is the next worst plus-minus on the Hurricanes belongs to defenseman Dennis Seidenberg at minus-10. Not only that, but Brind’Amour’s rating is 35 worse than teammate Eric Staal, who leads the team at plus-8.

In the case of Brind’Amour, there is absolutely no doubt his level of play has dropped considerably this season, something that shouldn’t be a complete surprise considering he turned 38 this past summer. By his own admission, Brind’Amour is having a horrible season.

“It’s not just been one game,” Brind’Amour told the Raleigh News and Observer last week, “it’s been all year.”

It’s interesting to note Brind’Amour is minus-19 at home, which should give people an indication of how his defensive skills have declined. Teams always have last change at home, meaning Brind’Amour is lining up in defensive situations against the best players in the league and he’s not getting the job done. When Brind’Amour was winning Selke Trophies, his hallmark was his ability to go head-to-head against top lines and shut them down, but obviously that’s not happening this season.

Related Links

If you could chalk Brind’Amour’s plus-minus to bad luck or playing for a bad team or the vagaries of the stat, that would be one thing. But the fact of the matter is only one player in the league, Calgary Flames defenseman Dion Phaneuf, has been on the ice for more than Brind’Amour’s 45 even strength goals against. On the other hand, Brind’Amour has been on the ice for just 18 of his team’s own even-strength goals this season.

While there’s no disputing the fact that Savard has become a much more responsible, dependable and mature player, there’s also no disputing that much of his success in plus-minus has to do with his surroundings. Until recently, Savard was one of those guys who put up big numbers on bad teams, hence the bad plus-minus.

To his credit, he has proved more recently he can be a contributor on a good team and his plus-minus is reflecting that. But don’t forget the Bruins have five of the top six plus-minus players in the league at the moment and while Savard has done his share offensively, he’s also benefiting from being in a great situation. It also helps that he’s on pace to break the 100-point barrier for the first time in his career.

And Savard’s plus-minus is far more in line with his teammates’ than Brind’Amour’s. The Bruins have six players who are better than plus-20 and a total of 11 who are in double digits. But Savard does deserve some credit here. He’s a far less selfish player than he was earlier in his career and his conditioning has improved immensely, particularly his lower body strength. He gets knocked off the puck far less than before and that leads to fewer chances against.

And there’s a good chance numbers like that are what will make Claude Julien the top contender for the Jack Adams Award as the league’s top coach. Julien has succeeded in implementing a system that demands defensive accountability, but has also given his players the freedom to be one of the most offensively creative teams in the league.

Ken Campbell, author of the book Habs Heroes, is a senior writer for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Wednesday and Fridays and his column, Campbell's Cuts, appears Mondays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (12)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Keith Hobbs Posted
(2009-04-30 07:43:20)



Some good points made here but I believe that the plus minus rating is flawed because it is weighted to favor the Pk and penalize the PP.I don't think that a player [pk]should be rewarded with a plus if he is not in jeopardy of recieving a minus while he is on the. Conversely I don't think a player [pp] should be in jeopardy of a minus if there is no possibility of a plus while he is on the ice. I think the only fair way for plus/minus to reflect the value of a player is to remove the bias altogether and make the rating an exclusively even-strength stat.
    0



Tiny19 Posted
(2009-04-30 07:41:25)



Jack Acid is on to something here. I've always thought that +/- was kind of a stupid stat. It really has very little to do with the player. More the team around him. Someone who is on PK but not on the PP has a strike against to begin with. An example I can give is Kris Draper of the Red Wings. Another Selke winner. Though his +/- has gone up recently due to the Wings doing a better job on the PK, he is still -12. His role on the team is a faceoff guy (still one of the best in the league ) and a PK guy. Most of his offence in the last few years has been shorthanded goals. He's been mostly a forth line guy this year and spends more than half of his TOI on PK duty. I wonder why his +/- sucks? With changes such as Jack Acid has suggested where the results are weighted a little bit this stat might actually be useful when evaluating a players worth.
    0



Rangers57 Posted
(2009-04-30 07:40:51)



Plus and Minus, isn't that simular to Ying and Yang? Or maybe that was up or down, NO it was Left or Right. I'm confused! It's the most over rated and meanless stat in hockey, used too much, and really means nothing of importance.
    0



Jack Acid Posted
(2009-04-30 07:40:28)



Plus/minus is supposedly a defensive statistic, yet the Selke Award winner might have an overall minus because of his lack of offense. I propose that defense be included in the equation. For every 2 minutes of successful PK time, a player is awarded a +1. If he's on ice for a SHG, a +2. If a PPG is scored within his 2 minutes, he gets a 0 - if 2 PPG's are scored in his 2 minutes, -1 (and so on) This may drive official scorers nuts, but at least a better assessment of defensive skill will be available.
    0



Tom Posted
(2009-04-30 07:40:10)



I agree with the premise of this column, however, I agree with a lot of people here, it is hard to call Savard a liability in his own zone. The statement detracts from the work the guy has been doing and changing his game such as Mike Modano and Steve Yzerman have done in the past. If you look at the numbers Savard (6th on his team) is on the ice 1:27 SH per game, Brind'Amour (fifth on his team) is at 1:34 SH per game. To use Brind'Amour and Savard as the examples for this column seems to be based on reputation rather than current history and unfair to Savard.
    0



Jamie Posted
(2009-04-30 07:40:01)



savard has been underrated for years. this guy was over a point per game pace with axelsson and murray last year, there arent too many centers this side of crosby and malkin that could pull that off. lets not forget that he is only one point behind crosby and ovechkin as of today (he will be ahead once the b's beat the habs tonite 9-0). if he keeps up this pace there is no doubt that he should at least get some recognition as a candidate for the heart. he is a leader, a playmaker, and very solid on D, he will not however be nominated, even if he lead the league in points.
    0



C.A. Marks Posted
(2009-04-30 07:39:59)



There's much more to Savard's great plus/minus than being in better shape and playing on a strong offensive team. His backchecking and forechecking have been outstanding (he's also a regular on the PK). It's no surprise that the Bruins have the best goals for/goals against differential in the league. EVERYONE who plays for Julien is a defensive as well as offensive player.
    0



Umm Posted
(2009-04-30 07:39:53)



Maybe they should stop putting Brin'Amour out against other teams' best lines...?
    0



baybye Posted
(2009-04-30 07:39:53)



+- are an interesting stat....they only show whether you were on the ice for a goal or when one was scored....you could have just jumped over the boards and not even be in the play and a goal is scored for a minus, the same for the plus side..so although a nice stat can be very over emphasised....
    0



Burns Posted
(2009-04-30 07:39:43)



people also forget that Brind'Amour had ACL surgery this offseason, and he's definetely slower because of it
    0




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners