• Print

Campbell's Cuts: With Anderson in HHOF, Bure should be next

Pavel Bure scored 437 goals in 702 games. (Jamie Squire/Staff/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Pavel Bure scored 437 goals in 702 games. (Jamie Squire/Staff/Getty Images)

When Glenn Anderson finally enters the hallowed Hockey Hall of Fame Monday, it will mark the end of one of the great injustices in the game. Anderson deserved to be enshrined among the all-time greats a long time ago and for reasons only it knows, the epitome of hockey’s old boy’s network kept him out.

Good on them, though, for finally correcting their mistake. And now that Anderson has been inducted, let’s move on to the next player who deserves to join him.

That would be Pavel Bure. Not Doug Gilmour, not Dino Ciccarelli, not Phil Housley, not Lorne Chabot. It’s not that those players aren’t worthy of consideration, but it’s an embarrassment that Bure is not in the Hall of Fame and it is time the rest of the hockey world began banging the drum in an effort to shame the selection committee to get off its laurels and get around to inducting him.

But like Anderson, who was eligible as far back as 2000, Bure will also have to be patient. He has been eligible for induction since 2006, but it’s pretty much certain he won’t even be considered in 2009. Steve Yzerman, Brett Hull, Brian Leetch and Luc Robitaille are not only worthy first-ballot inductees, but they’d also make up one of the strongest induction classes of all-time.

(What boggles the mind is what exactly made Anderson worthy of the Hall of Fame after he was supposedly unworthy the first seven times he was eligible. But let’s not try to figure out the rationale behind inductions or we’ll drive ourselves out of our minds.)

But there’s no doubt Bure belongs among them. He was a prodigious goal-scorer and one of the most exciting and dynamic players in the history of the game. His skill sold tickets, then pulled people out of their seats once they paid for them. Even though much of his career was spent going head-to-head with the likes of Jaromir Jagr, Teemu Selanne, Alexander Mogilny, Cam Neely and Theo Fleury in their primes, he was a first-team all-star once at right wing and a second-teamer twice.

I’m not about to get into comparing Bure with players who are already in the Hall of Fame just to make his case. That’s because the reality is anyone who doesn’t realize that Bure belongs in the Hall ahead of the likes of Bob Pulford, Dick Duff, Bernie Federko, Clark Gillies and a host of other marginal players seriously has to have his or her hockey credentials revoked. Just because the Hall has made a number of egregious errors on player inductions in the past doesn’t mean it should continue to do so by going to the lowest common denominator.

But they wouldn’t be doing that with Bure. From the time he came into the league with the Vancouver Canucks in 1991-92, Bure was and electrifying presence and a player who was a legitimate threat to make something exciting happen every time he was on the ice. In addition to his all-star berths, Bure won the Calder Trophy in 1992 (over Nicklas Lidstrom) and twice won the Rocket Richard Trophy. He also would have won the trophy in 1993-94 had it existed.

Related Links

The two arguments against Bure are that his career was cut short by injury and he never won a Stanley Cup, but both of those are quite easily debunked.

First of all, having a short career didn’t hurt Bobby Orr or Mike Bossy and it should not be held against Bure that his back gave in to the rigors of playing in the toughest league in the world. Had he spent the first half or two-thirds of his career playing in Europe and piling up Olympic gold medals and World Championships against inferior competition and in a much less rigorous environment, the way 2008 inductee Igor Larionov did, Bure would have his path to the Hall of Fame cleared already.

Secondly, it’s not Bure’s fault he didn’t win a Stanley Cup. He came agonizingly close to doing so with the Vancouver Canucks in 1994, a spring in which he led all NHL players in playoff goals with 16. Although Bure only played in the playoffs five times, he failed to average at least a point per game just one of those years and his 70 points in 64 playoff games stacks up favorably against a lot of players with Hall of Fame credentials.

But it was his sustained excellence during the regular season – particularly in goal scoring – that sets Bure apart. He played just 702 games, but scored 437 goals, just 47 fewer than Hall of Famer Darryl Sittler, whose 484 career goals came in almost 400 more games than Bure played. In fact, Bure’s average of .623 goals per game is third-highest in NHL history among the league’s top 100 goal scorers behind only Bossy (.762) and Mario Lemieux (.754).

And even though Bure would become the first Russian player in history to be inducted almost solely on his NHL exploits, he also has an impressive international resume that some might not take into account. He was part of one of the most dominant lines in World Junior Championship history in 1989 with Mogilny and Sergei Fedorov, where Bure was named the top forward. He followed that up with a World Championship in 1990 and a silver medal at the 1998 Olympics, in which he scored nine goals in six games and was named the top forward of the tournament.

Bure has the Hall of Fame credentials to be sure. His day will undoubtedly come. It’s too bad the selection committee will have to be shamed into inducting him far too late the way it did with Anderson.

Ken Campbell is a senior writer for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Wednesday and Fridays and his column, Campbell's Cuts, appears Mondays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (22)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Brummund Posted
(2009-04-30 07:53:48)



hell ya!! bure before anyone he took the game to another level in so many different ways just like ovechkin is doing these days.
    0



jp lamarre Posted
(2009-04-30 07:18:56)



Pavel in my opinnion was a victim of the times if he would have had played at any other time in the nhl he would have gotten numbers way superior to what he has and i dont care what anyone says he was the most electrifying player to touch the ice since guy lafleur laced up for the habs
    0



Ryan Moir Posted
(2009-04-30 07:18:50)



I do believe that Pavel Bure should eventually be in the Hall but I do believe he will have to wait in line for awhile. I think Doug Gilmour does deserve to be in the hall before Bure does. Or at least the same year. I also believe that Alex Mogilny comes before Bure. Also if he got in based on the fact of his injuries holding him back somewhat. I guess that means you believe Eric Lindros should be in the Hall. And I'm not for sure that should ever happen. But again I do believe that Bure belongs in the Hall. But it can wait. There are greater names about to go in and that belong to be there.
    0



Steve Loher Posted
(2009-04-30 07:18:45)



Bravo "Picard" !!! -- Why do writers have to cut someone else down to build up someone else's case ?? While there are certainly players in the HHOF who may not have been the only reason people came to games, just ask their peers if they belong in the Hall. Ask Wayne Gretzky if Bernie Federko belongs in the Hall. (FYI - He HAS been asked and he whole-heartedly said that Federko belongs with no questions asked.) If you want to lower yourself to make an argument for keeping someone out of the hall because they weren't a "drawing card", look no farther than new inductee Glenn Anderson. Do you think he brought people to the seats? Certainly not by himself. Gretzky, Messier, Kurri, Fuhr, etc. and that WHOLE team sold tickets But does Anderson belong in the Hall for what he did for that team? Yes. So please folks (and especially writers like you Mr. Campbell), stop cutting down other worthy players when trying to establish the induction criteria for players like Pavel Bure, etc.
    0



h8ght1me Posted
(2009-04-30 07:18:45)



Bure was an exciting player, but please don't put him in the same category as Bobby Orr and Mike Bossy. yes they all had short career, but Mr. Orr and Mr. Bossy did what no other players could do. Bobby Orr won eight straight norris trophies and 2 scoring titles. No defenseman ever accomplish that feat. Mike Bossy played 10 season. He had 9 straight season with 50 or more goals, the only season he didn't get 50 goals was dues to injuries. Not even the Great One had 9 straight 50 goals season. Bobby Orr and Mike Bossy deserve to be in THOF as soon as they retire, as for Bure he should wait like anyone else. I can't believe THN let u wrote this.
    0



Harmin C. Posted
(2009-04-30 07:18:44)



Pavel Bure was one of the best goal scorers to be in the NHL. He could single-handedly turn a defenseman inside out. I had the honor of growing up watching him play in vancouver and going to the 94 finals. I still have 2 cards that I had gotten autographed from him. He scored goals in the days when "Hack and Slash" was allowed. If he played now, theres no way he wouldn't average 50-70 goals a season... He deserves to be in the HHoF and he will be. Just a matter of time.
    0



Stads Posted
(2009-04-30 07:18:43)



Growing up and living for hockey in MN, Pavel was my all out hero. There is just no matching his all out speed and talent. For kids growing up and coming into their own during his heyday, there was no other player that could excite like the Russian Rocket. Regardless of his shortcomings and lack of a Cup, his shear numbers will be enough. P.S....THN couldn't find a better picture than him taking a knee in a Panther's jersey?
    0



tk421 Posted
(2009-04-30 07:18:39)



I couldn't agree more. Any player that was consistently one of the top 10 scorers for a decade needs to be considered among one of hockey's greatest.
    0



Jesse Fitzpatrick Posted
(2009-04-30 07:18:37)



I woould rather see doug gilmour a true hockey player get into the hockey hall of fame than pavel bure. Nothing against bure but he wasn't a leader and he didn't play the playoffs with a srewed up ankle llike gilmour.
    0



sabresfan1 Posted
(2009-04-30 07:18:37)



I dont think Gilmour should, when people compare players they says "the next gretzky" (for all round skill) - "the next Gainy" (for back checking corner work etc.) - "the next Bure" (for speed) or "the next patrick roy/terry sawchuck/martin brodour" (for goalies) and "the next Glen Anderson" (for beign able to get to the net), no one says "the next Doug Gilmour", unless they;re talking about "a good kingston kid" haha
    0



1 2 3

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Who should start in goal for Russia at the Olympics?






THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I was coming in to take the boards away and had some good jump. He bobbled the puck at the last second and I don’t think he saw me coming at all. It was a shoulder right in his chest. He’s eight feet tall, so it’s not like you could hit him in the head.”

- Ottawa's Chris Neil about a hit he threw on Tampa's Victor Hedman Thursday night, causing Hedman to leave the game.

Our Partners