Ken Campbell
2008-11-10 11:31:00
When Glenn Anderson finally enters the hallowed Hockey Hall of Fame Monday, it will mark the end of one of the great injustices in the game. Anderson deserved to be enshrined among the all-time greats a long time ago and for reasons only it knows, the epitome of hockey’s old boy’s network kept him out.
Good on them, though, for finally correcting their mistake. And now that Anderson has been inducted, let’s move on to the next player who deserves to join him.
That would be Pavel Bure. Not Doug Gilmour, not Dino Ciccarelli, not Phil Housley, not Lorne Chabot. It’s not that those players aren’t worthy of consideration, but it’s an embarrassment that Bure is not in the Hall of Fame and it is time the rest of the hockey world began banging the drum in an effort to shame the selection committee to get off its laurels and get around to inducting him.
But like Anderson, who was eligible as far back as 2000, Bure will also have to be patient. He has been eligible for induction since 2006, but it’s pretty much certain he won’t even be considered in 2009. Steve Yzerman, Brett Hull, Brian Leetch and Luc Robitaille are not only worthy first-ballot inductees, but they’d also make up one of the strongest induction classes of all-time.
(What boggles the mind is what exactly made Anderson worthy of the Hall of Fame after he was supposedly unworthy the first seven times he was eligible. But let’s not try to figure out the rationale behind inductions or we’ll drive ourselves out of our minds.)
But there’s no doubt Bure belongs among them. He was a prodigious goal-scorer and one of the most exciting and dynamic players in the history of the game. His skill sold tickets, then pulled people out of their seats once they paid for them. Even though much of his career was spent going head-to-head with the likes of Jaromir Jagr, Teemu Selanne, Alexander Mogilny, Cam Neely and Theo Fleury in their primes, he was a first-team all-star once at right wing and a second-teamer twice.
I’m not about to get into comparing Bure with players who are already in the Hall of Fame just to make his case. That’s because the reality is anyone who doesn’t realize that Bure belongs in the Hall ahead of the likes of Bob Pulford, Dick Duff, Bernie Federko, Clark Gillies and a host of other marginal players seriously has to have his or her hockey credentials revoked. Just because the Hall has made a number of egregious errors on player inductions in the past doesn’t mean it should continue to do so by going to the lowest common denominator.
But they wouldn’t be doing that with Bure. From the time he came into the league with the Vancouver Canucks in 1991-92, Bure was and electrifying presence and a player who was a legitimate threat to make something exciting happen every time he was on the ice. In addition to his all-star berths, Bure won the Calder Trophy in 1992 (over Nicklas Lidstrom) and twice won the Rocket Richard Trophy. He also would have won the trophy in 1993-94 had it existed.
Related Links
The two arguments against Bure are that his career was cut short by injury and he never won a Stanley Cup, but both of those are quite easily debunked.
First of all, having a short career didn’t hurt Bobby Orr or Mike Bossy and it should not be held against Bure that his back gave in to the rigors of playing in the toughest league in the world. Had he spent the first half or two-thirds of his career playing in Europe and piling up Olympic gold medals and World Championships against inferior competition and in a much less rigorous environment, the way 2008 inductee Igor Larionov did, Bure would have his path to the Hall of Fame cleared already.
Secondly, it’s not Bure’s fault he didn’t win a Stanley Cup. He came agonizingly close to doing so with the Vancouver Canucks in 1994, a spring in which he led all NHL players in playoff goals with 16. Although Bure only played in the playoffs five times, he failed to average at least a point per game just one of those years and his 70 points in 64 playoff games stacks up favorably against a lot of players with Hall of Fame credentials.
But it was his sustained excellence during the regular season – particularly in goal scoring – that sets Bure apart. He played just 702 games, but scored 437 goals, just 47 fewer than Hall of Famer Darryl Sittler, whose 484 career goals came in almost 400 more games than Bure played. In fact, Bure’s average of .623 goals per game is third-highest in NHL history among the league’s top 100 goal scorers behind only Bossy (.762) and Mario Lemieux (.754).
And even though Bure would become the first Russian player in history to be inducted almost solely on his NHL exploits, he also has an impressive international resume that some might not take into account. He was part of one of the most dominant lines in World Junior Championship history in 1989 with Mogilny and Sergei Fedorov, where Bure was named the top forward. He followed that up with a World Championship in 1990 and a silver medal at the 1998 Olympics, in which he scored nine goals in six games and was named the top forward of the tournament.
Bure has the Hall of Fame credentials to be sure. His day will undoubtedly come. It’s too bad the selection committee will have to be shamed into inducting him far too late the way it did with Anderson.
Ken Campbell is a senior writer for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Wednesday and Fridays and his column, Campbell's Cuts, appears Mondays.
For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.
jp lamarre (Posted 2008-11-12 08:22:39)
Pavel in my opinnion was a victim of the times if he would have had played at any other time in the nhl he would have gotten numbers way superior to what he has and i dont care what anyone says he was the most electrifying player to touch the ice since guy lafleur laced up for the habs
Ryan Moir (Posted 2008-11-11 17:04:14)
I do believe that Pavel Bure should eventually be in the Hall but I do believe he will have to wait in line for awhile. I think Doug Gilmour does deserve to be in the hall before Bure does. Or at least the same year. I also believe that Alex Mogilny comes before Bure.
Also if he got in based on the fact of his injuries holding him back somewhat. I guess that means you believe Eric Lindros should be in the Hall. And I'm not for sure that should ever happen. But again I do believe that Bure belongs in the Hall. But it can wait. There are greater names about to go in and that belong to be there.
h8ght1me (Posted 2008-11-11 10:57:10)
Bure was an exciting player, but please don't put him in the same category as Bobby Orr and Mike Bossy. yes they all had short career, but Mr. Orr and Mr. Bossy did what no other players could do. Bobby Orr won eight straight norris trophies and 2 scoring titles. No defenseman ever accomplish that feat. Mike Bossy played 10 season. He had 9 straight season with 50 or more goals, the only season he didn't get 50 goals was dues to injuries. Not even the Great One had 9 straight 50 goals season. Bobby Orr and Mike Bossy deserve to be in THOF as soon as they retire, as for Bure he should wait like anyone else. I can't believe THN let u wrote this.
Steve Loher (Posted 2008-11-11 10:37:33)
Bravo "Picard" !!! -- Why do writers have to cut someone else down to build up someone else's case ?? While there are certainly players in the HHOF who may not have been the only reason people came to games, just ask their peers if they belong in the Hall. Ask Wayne Gretzky if Bernie Federko belongs in the Hall. (FYI - He HAS been asked and he whole-heartedly said that Federko belongs with no questions asked.) If you want to lower yourself to make an argument for keeping someone out of the hall because they weren't a "drawing card", look no farther than new inductee Glenn Anderson. Do you think he brought people to the seats? Certainly not by himself. Gretzky, Messier, Kurri, Fuhr, etc. and that WHOLE team sold tickets But does Anderson belong in the Hall for what he did for that team? Yes. So please folks (and especially writers like you Mr. Campbell), stop cutting down other worthy players when trying to establish the induction criteria for players like Pavel Bure, etc.
Harmin C. (Posted 2008-11-11 09:36:48)
Pavel Bure was one of the best goal scorers to be in the NHL. He could single-handedly turn a defenseman inside out. I had the honor of growing up watching him play in vancouver and going to the 94 finals. I still have 2 cards that I had gotten autographed from him. He scored goals in the days when "Hack and Slash" was allowed. If he played now, theres no way he wouldn't average 50-70 goals a season... He deserves to be in the HHoF and he will be. Just a matter of time.
Stads (Posted 2008-11-10 23:56:37)
Growing up and living for hockey in MN, Pavel was my all out hero. There is just no matching his all out speed and talent. For kids growing up and coming into their own during his heyday, there was no other player that could excite like the Russian Rocket. Regardless of his shortcomings and lack of a Cup, his shear numbers will be enough.
P.S....THN couldn't find a better picture than him taking a knee in a Panther's jersey?
tk421 (Posted 2008-11-10 20:35:11)
I couldn't agree more. Any player that was consistently one of the top 10 scorers for a decade needs to be considered among one of hockey's greatest.
sabresfan1 (Posted 2008-11-10 18:51:34)
I dont think Gilmour should, when people compare players they says "the next gretzky" (for all round skill) - "the next Gainy" (for back checking corner work etc.) - "the next Bure" (for speed) or "the next patrick roy/terry sawchuck/martin brodour" (for goalies) and "the next Glen Anderson" (for beign able to get to the net), no one says "the next Doug Gilmour", unless they;re talking about "a good kingston kid" haha
Jesse Fitzpatrick (Posted 2008-11-10 18:25:44)
I woould rather see doug gilmour a true hockey player get into the hockey hall of fame than pavel bure. Nothing against bure but he wasn't a leader
and he didn't play the playoffs with a srewed up ankle llike gilmour.
Henric E (Posted 2008-11-10 17:04:52)
I totally agree with you.....
Andrew Castell (Posted 2008-11-10 16:38:05)
The question must be asked ? Would you pay money to see Bernie Federko or Clark Gillies play ????? I didn't think so !!! When Pavel Bure played at home or on the road there would be people lining up to buy tickets just to see him play, there were not too many players that could do that. There was always a buzz in the air when Pavel came to town.
When I was a season ticket holder with the Canucks' you could feel the excitement building even during the warmup and then when the game started and Pavel hit the ice you had a feeling you were going to witness something very special. He could skate and shoot a hundred miles an hour
and that sells tickets.
R. MacDonald (Posted 2008-11-10 16:21:49)
Can you imagine Bure in this era of with no clutch and grab? He would challenge for Gretzky's 92 goals record. He for sure belongs in the Hall, but I'm not sure about being ahead of Gilmour or Dino.
Picard (Posted 2008-11-10 16:12:58)
Fair point except how would using Bernie Federko as an example of guys who are in the Hall but shouldn't be make Bure's case any better? If they are close enough to be comparable, and Federko doesn't belong, then why should Bure belong? Two wrongs doesn't make a right, and if you think Federko doesn't belong in, but you think Bure DOES belong, based on the fact that Federko is IN, then isn't that compounding the error? A ripple effect, of sorts? The point is, the Hall's standards should not be brought down because of a few questioanble honorees - its level of expected excellence should be maintained...and using the weaker enshrinees as proof that OTHER weak/questionable potential honorees belong in the Hall doesn't fly with me.
Steven Noble (Posted 2008-11-10 15:56:15)
Without a doubt. One of the most skilled, exciting players to lace up skates since Guy Lafleur did his thing. It's also even more impressive that he continued to put up huge numbers as the NHL's style of play faded to a clutch and grab, trap and kill-skill jungle full of talentless gorillas. And Campbell isn't neccessarily saying certain players don't belong in the HOF, rather pointing out that if they are in, then Bure was at least, if not moreso deservingly based on what he did. It's called backing up an argument and class has nothing to do with it.
Picard (Posted 2008-11-10 15:47:39)
While I tend to agree that Bure has a place in the Hall, I can't agree with the fact that the author feels the need to insult no less than 5 existing Hall of Famers to make the point. Do you think Bernie Federko, Dick Duff, Clark Gillies and Bob Pulford appreciate being constantly named as guys who don't deserve to be enshrined? Do you think that constantly putting down their legacies is going to make the HHOF take their glass plates down from the wall, like they did with Eagleson? Do you think Larionov likes reading the he "padded his stats" playing "inferior players" Russia, in order to make the Hall? On this, one of the biggest weeks of his career? Class, as always from Ken Campbell. Oh, and while Bure deserves to be in the Hall eventually, there are many much more deserving players (some of which were named), including some of the ladies of the sport, before he should hear his name called for this honour. By then, he may have more credentials to add to his resume, as acting GM of Russian Hockey.
bropete (Posted 2008-11-10 15:09:20)
If all that's required to get into the HHOF is to score point's I'm sure there are a few more ex-Oilers who'll get in purely because of who they played with. You think Cheechoo would have had his goal's if someone other than Thornton was passing him the puck. Bure deserve's to be there based on HIS play and the excitement he created when he played. That Anderson is in ahead of him is purely due to who Anderson's team-mate's were, not who was the better player.
Brandon C. (Posted 2008-11-10 13:09:28)
An obvious choice to be in. But sadly, it won't be next season. And the 'powers tha be' better not try and stiff Forsberg when his turn comes up because of 'longevity issues' either. He's the best post-1980's player not named Mario.
Andrew Castell (Posted 2008-11-10 13:07:29)
Yes, Pavel Bure should be in the Hockey Hall Of Fame. Pavel played his first ever game on November 5,1991 vs the Winnipeg Jets and although he did not score that night, he turned Jet's defenceman Dean Kennedy inside out so badly that night that I am sure that Kennedy is still wondering what happened after all these years. Everytime that Pavel hit the ice you knew that something special was going to happen and that it would be replayed later on one of the TV sport shows. I can only think of one other player that could go end to end at warp like speed and bring people out of their seats and that would be Buffalo Sabre great Gilbert Perreault. He was like a rock star in Vancouver and in all the years that I was a season ticket holder (29) he was by far the best player that has ever put on a Canucks' jersey (no not Roberto Luongo). With all the rest of the players that have been inducted and with no disrespect to Clark Gillies and Bernie Federko, Pavel Bure should be inducted into the Hockey Hall Of Fame.
Flyer guy (Posted 2008-11-10 12:56:29)
Bure was the most exciting player I ever paid to see. It's been said many times, but EVERY time he was on the ice you knew something amazing could happen. And a wicked mean streak too, just ask Shane Churla.
Matt F. (Posted 2008-11-10 12:17:45)
Greatest player to play for the Panthers. Okay, that's just too obvious haha, but I completely agree.
Michael mahler (Posted 2008-11-10 12:10:27)
I couldn't agree more. Bure's performance in the 1994 playoffs was one for the ages. He was arguably the best player in the league during that time frame. In fact, he may have single handedly saved hockey in Vancouver. He should be in the hall of fame right now, no doubt.