• Print

Screen Shots: Hockey establishment full of hypocrisy in view of Sean Avery

Sean Avery of the Dallas Stars crowds Henrik Lundqvist of the New York Rangers in an Oct. 20 game. (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Sean Avery of the Dallas Stars crowds Henrik Lundqvist of the New York Rangers in an Oct. 20 game. (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

When it comes to rank hypocrisy, you have to hand it to Bob Clarke.

No, really – you have to hand it to him, or he’ll take a baseball swing with his hockey stick and break your ankle.

How hilarious was it watching Clarke rip into Sean Avery (on TSN’s Off The Record) the other day? About as hilarious as it would be if Barry Bonds went off on the bodybuilding community for employing non-natural improvement methods. About as hilarious as it would be if Mariah Carey mocked dolphins for their glass-shattering squeals.

Watching Avery become the biggest boogeyman in hockey is almost as funny. The guy openly admits his act is just that – an act – yet he’s still got the game’s upper crust sneering down as if he were beneath their contempt.

"There's always been players who are characters in this game," Clarke told Off The Record on Wednesday. "You may not like them, but they're character guys and character players and they bring something to the game. Avery takes from the game."

This, from the gentleman who took Russian superstar Valeri Kharlamov from the game during the legendary 1972 Summit Series.

Just try to comprehend the amount of rationalization required for Clarke to arrive at the conclusion that his heinous assault on Kharlamov was proper, but Avery waving a stick in the face of Devils goalie Martin Brodeur or uttering an untoward remark about somebody – well, that’s simply beyond the pale.

“He's (Avery) making a fool of the game,” said Clarke, whose lengthy feud with Eric Lindros when both were key employees of the Flyers brought nothing but honor to the game. “He crosses the line all the time. He's an idiot. And if the referees see him giving it to Brodeur like he did in the playoffs – yapping, yapping, yapping – it's pre-meditated.

“Give him a penalty. You'll end it right away. If not, I think one of the Devils should come to Brodeur's aid. Drill him, punch him, make him fight. If he wants to be a yapper, make him fight.”

To recap: Psychological warfare in the NHL = verboten. Forcing somebody to fight in the NHL = not only acceptable, but encouraged.

Is it any wonder the league that’s made Clarke famous is virtually guaranteed to have at least one horrifically violent on-ice incident every season? Should anyone be mortified to see the game devolve to the point where, as my colleague Ken Campbell noted, you can’t even lay a solid, clean hit on a player without expecting to be punched in the mouth for it?

Related Links

Of course not. For the entire history of the NHL, the inmates have been allowed to run the asylum – and the end result is the only professional sports operation that sells and condones knee-jerk retribution and a cavalier disregard for an opponent’s well-being ahead of skill.

Ergo, a lunkhead like Ryan Hollweg is afforded the benefit of the doubt from the league despite repeated transgressions, while a solid citizen such as Mike Peca gets handed a five-game suspension for touching an official.

The last time I appeared on OTR, I heard every other panelist mention how much they’d love to have a guy like Hollweg on their team, because he’d do anything to win.

Apparently, “doing anything” to win doesn’t include “saying anything” to win. And that’s why the convoluted code that governs this game is so preposterous – and, yes, hilarious; the big boys who are supposedly such tough hombres get their widdle feewings hurt when somebody calls them a name, forcing them to lash out in a manner that would put them behind prison bars were they to do so on any other portion of the planet.

Sean Avery is the embodiment of evil? Puh. Lease.

“He goes way too far,” Clarke said of Avery. “It's up to (Stars co-GMs) Brett Hull and Les Jackson to stop him because it's an embarrassment to hockey.”

An embarrassment, Bob? I don’t think so. The embarrassment is that anybody in the NHL who shows the slightest hint of a personality – and who won’t be shoved into silence – is considered an embarrassment.


Adam Proteau is writer and columnist for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Mondays, his Ask Adam feature appears Fridays and his column, Screen Shots, appears Thursdays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (101)

Sort: Oldest | Newest | Love | Hate    Filter: All | Videos


Kelly McKenzie Posted
(2009-04-30 07:15:47)



I can't respect a coward and a bully, he was called on several times the other night by some Jersey players and he wouldn't even make eye contact. Anyone who praises Avery should have their head and their ethics closely examined.
    0



Brian Kemp Posted
(2009-04-30 07:15:11)



JCM, that is probably the most interesting theory on why hockey players are so boring in interviews I've read to date. Nice going. Me, I like Avery, on the ice anyway (I've never met him, he might be a jerk, I don't know). He gets people off their game, doesn't take a huge amount of bad penalties himself, can skate and has second line skills. If he crosses the line with some of his comments, that kind of sucks and maybe the guys being insulted should give him a "stern talking to", but should the other teams heavyweights target him? I don't think so, unless they are the victim of the trash talk. If they do, though, there's a chance their team might pay on the scoreboard, and the last time I checked, the game wasn't about settling scores with the guy who said mean things about your mom, it was about scoring more goals than the other team, so if these guys can't handle really insulting language, well, their team will suffer for it.
    0



JCM Posted
(2009-04-30 07:14:53)



I can answer all your questions (and dreams, and fantasies, but thats a different story, told in French) about Ryan Hollweg. I think that Avery (and Louis Robitaille, and many others) should continue the psychological game and that that Bobby "Big Bert" McSorely should put up or shut up. I think that the reason some of these guys are angry about the mental game is that they don't have one. I think if you swing your stick at someone's head or if you pile drive a guy into a career ending neck breaker (literally) you should be in Jail not on the suspension list. If you can't control your head enough to not come out of the box and whack an official with a chair (Goldy Goldberg) then you shouldn't be in the game. They have a sport for that, mullets accepted: wrestling. No dishing on Goldberg, he actually got what he deserved and then some and he hasn't complained about it. So without further ado: my explanation of why some guys have it and some guys don't. Social Skills. Sean Avery is able to do and say things that make lesser minds feeble and prone to acts of time in the penalty box. Off the ice? He can be equally unlikeable. Win-team, lose-Avery. If Avery was more amicable off the rink, perhaps everyone would be looking at this in a different light. Tee Ball skills. Todd Bertuzzi is able to do things that will land you in a body cast, but apparently can't answer questions that he asks himself about why he would do such a thing. In the locker room? He seems to be well liked. So, the guy that "fits in" is right. The guy with poor social skills is not. It has nothing to do with what they do on the ice but how well liked they are off it. Jason Blake is a top scorer, has fought through adversity in college and pros to make it to the top and stay there. Real quality athlete, everyone speaks oodles of kudos about his prowess and determination. Off ice? He's kind of a jerk. End result: he's always considered expendable at the trade deadline. So, check your notes from high school and compare. This is a sport whose culture is founded on kids leaving home at 13 and creating their own lord of the flies hierarchy. Fit in or be forced out. I don't like Blake, I've met him. But you know, maybe he's just misunderstood and has a hard time relating to the other guys and so he comes across poorly. Avery seems to be completely at ease with who he is and doesn't want to "fit in" and that may be the reason there is so much angst about him. A lot of people can't deal with the guy that's different. Right or wrong. And a lot of people who do bad things are exonerated because they fall in rank and file.
    0



11 Cups Posted
(2009-04-30 07:14:48)



There is a huge difference between an agitator and an instigator. Avery is neither. He's an outright GOON. I'm from Detroit, hated him here and will hate him until he's dead. That's saying a lot, being I don't have a lot of hate in me.
    0



Kevin Posted
(2009-04-30 07:14:34)



It's interesting reading all these comments, and I enjoying learning more about all the different perspectives. Sure Avery is a punk, and often his own teammates don't even like him. Apparently though, he isn't disliked THAT much by other players, or he'd get clocked nightly. I mean, it's not like dropping the hammer is out of bounds in this league. As far as fighting goes, I can get passionate about my dislike for it, but it's proponents have a point as well. I personally think it's a waste of time, and should be obsoleted, if for no other reason that if two guys in the stands do the same thing, they'd be arrested. Of course, if I tackled someone in the mall, I'd get arrested too, so football isn't off the hook in that argument, and I'm sure using a blockout to keep someone off a sale table while I shopped would be heavily frowned upon. But the real reason fighting should be outlawed, I believe, is pretty simple, If you want to grow the sport, it's got to go. There are only so many people interested in seeing a couple guys throw down, and they are, for the most part, already fans. You'll pick up a few over time, but it long ago reached the saturation point. Now for those of you who enjoy that, you are probably perfectly happy with the way things are, and I understand that. But if the NHL is going to grow and draw TV interest, two marginal-at-best players duking it out and sitting in the box or heading to the dressing room is no draw. Hooking and holding and impeding the play of terrific skaters and shooters is uninteresting. I like a nice, clean hit as much as the next guy. They are effective and have their place. Holloweg is a criminal on skates, and so are players who exercise his tactics. How about this for a rule consideration: When a player illegaly hits another player (say Marcus Naslund for example), and that player receives an injury causing him to miss time (say six weeks), then the opposing team would lose the services of an equivalent player and the offender for an equal amount of time. Illegal hits would disappear almost instantly, people like Holloweg would either become unemployed or learn how to play hockey, and Georges Laroque could use his off-ice good nature to pursue more useful interests. Maybe Clarkie could star in his own underground fight club reality show. As for those of you who seem to think people who don't like fighting are somehow unworthy of being hockey fans...I really don't see the wisdom in alienating what is certainly a large part of the fan base. My beef is with the practice, not those fans in favor of it. We pay the same ridiculous price for tickets, food, parking, jerseys and cable, and if we didn't, the sport would certainly be doing worse. Try not to hate so much...
    0



Amber Ashley Posted
(2009-04-30 07:14:32)



I think Sean Avery brings a lot to the sport of hockey. A lot of people only watch hockey to see the fights and Avery brings what a lot of people are looking for. Avery is my favorite player and I enjoy seeing him each time he steps onto the ice. And it doesn't hurt that he is amazingly sexy! :) Hockey needs more Sean Averys!
    0



Steve Posted
(2009-04-30 07:14:28)



I don't know what Hollweg and fight-mentality are doing in the same column, but I'd certainly like to see Hollweg suspended for a season or two the next time he boards somebody.
    0



Kelly McKenzie Posted
(2009-04-30 07:14:23)



Avery's a boring cartoon....nuff said.
    0



Eric Posted
(2009-04-30 07:14:21)



Precisely, Gordon.
    0



Flyerfan52 Posted
(2009-04-30 07:14:21)



I imagine the reason the Stars players (especially Turco) are happy to have him on the team is that they don't have to listen to him on the ice. A death threat! That's worse than the racial comments some players have been disciplined for in the past.
    0



1 2 3 ...9 10 11

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Who wins the Smyth-Quincey/Preissing trade?




THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

"I'm not here to replace him."

- Martin Havlat, who signed with Minnesota a few hours after former Wild star Marian Gaborik inked a UFA deal with the Rangers.

Our Partners