Dany Heatley is the highest paid player in the NHL this year with a $10 million salary, but how much will he owe back? (Photo by Jana Chytilova/NHLI via Getty Images)
Mike Smith
2008-10-22 12:03:00
The NHL is entering the fourth season under the new collective bargaining agreement. The first three years have witnessed significant revenue growth that has led to an increase in club payrolls.
Salaries, from the players’ perspective, have risen nicely.
There is a notion the new agreement has helped the players more than the clubs. But before you make an assessment, you need to read the entire pact. There is likely to be a major shift back toward the clubs during the 2008-09 season.
First, let’s look at some numbers:
The Hockey Related Revenue (HRR) for 2007-08 was $2.606 billion. The players received 56.7 percent of the HRR, $1.508 billion. The salary cap was $50.1 million for each club. It has been reported by various sources that the six Canadian clubs were responsible for one-third of the total HRR.
The salary total for players committed at the start of the 2008-09 season is $1.599 billion (according to nhlnumbers.com). The average club payroll is just more than $53 million. The cap ceiling is $56.7 million per club, which is $1.701 billion for the league.
The average player salary is approximately $2.215 million. Good work if you can get it.
Clubs that have less than $1 million in cap space are: Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Montreal, New York Rangers, Pittsburgh, San Jose, Minnesota and Washington. This list includes the last Stanley Cup winner, Detroit, last year’s runner-up, Pittsburgh, and several others that believe they can compete for the Cup this season. Chicago is the only non-playoff team from last year in this grouping.
Seven teams have more than $8 million in cap space: Atlanta, Los Angeles, Nashville, New York Islanders, Phoenix, Toronto and Vancouver. Only Nashville made the playoffs last season. This group, unlike the first one, has plenty of cap space for roster upgrades during the season.
Related Links
So why is there a strong possibility of a change this year and, if so, what are the causes?
There is an “escrow” clause in the CBA that says approximately 10 percent of each player’s salary is placed in an “escrow account.” If the league’s projected HRR is met, the players receive 100 percent of their salary. Last season, all players received their full salaries.
That does not look to be the case for this season. There have been different factors that have led to the league’s revenue growth and two of them are Canadian related. First, the passionate Canadian fans, driven by their love of the game and the sense that anyone can win right now (not just the rich teams), have filled the buildings night after night.
Second, the Canadian dollar has risen in value against the U.S. dollar. For most of last season it was at par, a far cry from when the dollar was 75 or 81 cents U.S.
The Canadian dollar has dropped below the 90 cents U.S. level during the recent economic crisis. At this level – and more so if it stays around 85 cents U.S. - the league’s HRR will drop.
If it drops far enough, the players will not receive their full salaries. The amount will be determined at the end of the season. As the season progresses, grumbling from the players’ side will be heard with the realization they will be taking a salary cut.
If you, the fan, are keeping score on how the new CBA is working, the “escrow” is a point, a big point, for Gary Bettman and the owners.
Mike Smith is a former GM with the Blackhawks and Jets and associate GM with the Maple Leafs. He also served as GM for Team USA at the '81, '94 and '95 IIHF World Championship. His Insider Blog will appear regularly only on THN.com.
nancy grundman (Posted 2008-11-14 21:25:56)
jdk: take a better look at Mike Smith's record; drafted Selanne, Tkachuk, Zhamnov, Khabibulin, Numminen et. al in Winnipeg, where finances couldn't allow for a team to stay together and succeed. Similar drafting in Toronto. Team was successful when he was there, but not when he left. Coincidence? Also, great drafting in Chicago in the final Wirtz/Pulford years when the old mentality still there. Was able to get them to the playoffs, something hadn't been done in awhile. Was right that Tony Amonte was washed up and didn't want Sutter favorite Theo Fleury who was similarly washed up and destroyed team chemistry.
jdk (Posted 2008-11-08 12:58:26)
Mike, do really think a guy with your abysmal track record as a GM throughout your miserable career should be commenting on anything NHL related? If you actually knew anything you would still have a job!
jan (Posted 2008-10-23 18:04:45)
I don't see the economy improving for quite some time. It'll be interesting to see what happens if the escrow clause kicks in.
As usual, we, the fans, will lose no matter what happens.
drew (Posted 2008-10-23 12:59:47)
the cba is bad for the players, and if the economy in america tanks more and we really get into an extended recession, hockey players are going to suffer badly. (i know this is relative but going from x million per year to x 100K is a big difference.) considering that revenues are still largely driven by attendance, the other leagues do not have this problem, ticket sales are going to drop as the economy tanks. as sales revenues drop because of less attendance and lower prices, salaries will go down, and as the writer so astutely noted, the "escrow" clause will kick in and reduce salaries even more. while i hated the lockout and have no love for annoying owners who constantly hike ticket prices, the players union completely mishandled the negotiations and hockey has suffered because of it. i am hoping there will be a silver lining to the economic crisis and a couple teams will fold (thrashers, panthers, 'canes, or coyotes) thus improving the overall talent of the remaining teams.
Jake (Posted 2008-10-23 00:26:55)
t-murder, no salaries remain the same as stated in the contracts. If owners were able to justify reducing salaries with a lower cap how could they not raise salaries with cap increases?
alex (Posted 2008-10-22 23:58:28)
Excellent analysis. Hockey will be hit hard by the downturn.
Jeff (Posted 2008-10-22 18:36:45)
If there is a claw-back of salaries, at least the players who play in Canada will be off-set (as they are paid in US dollars but live in Canada). Maybe this will help make players want to play in E-town!
t-murder (Posted 2008-10-22 17:28:12)
If there is a drop in the cap aren't the players salaries reduced by the same percentage?
Maxime (Posted 2008-10-22 16:55:44)
The dollar dropped below 80 cents today...ooo the players aren't going to be happy...
Michael LaBroad (Posted 2008-10-22 16:41:07)
Seems the sport and the fans took a huge hit a few years ago to control expenses which seem to be higher and more out of control than before the lockout. Without the US television $$rights checks that the other major sports receive, the only way teams can spend to the cap is to charge higher seat, concession and merchandise prices. the NHL probably has the highest ratio of costs bore by the fan...in these times, not good.
Chris L (Posted 2008-10-22 13:32:15)
I would like to see players contracts to be determined by a percentage of the salary cap. That way no matter what the cap is at the end of the year there is no set $ figure the player was expecting. Also No contract should be allowed to be longer than the current CBA.
Ted (Posted 2008-10-22 12:23:58)
Just wait till the Cap drops and those playoff teams start giving away / demoting NHL players. KHL might start looking mighty appealing once more than just McLaren is a salary cap victim in the AHL.