• Print

THN.com Blog: Stoll contract another example of failing CBA

Traded to the Kings earlier this summer, Jarret Stoll signed a deal with the Kings Thursday. (Photo by Andy Devlin/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Traded to the Kings earlier this summer, Jarret Stoll signed a deal with the Kings Thursday. (Photo by Andy Devlin/NHLI via Getty Images)

If you’re looking for Reason No. 3,421 why the current collective bargaining agreement isn’t working, look no further than yesterday’s signing of Jarret Stoll by the Los Angeles Kings.

Let’s get this straight: Stoll emerges as a legitimate two-way threat by scoring 68 points in 2005-06. Then gets just seven more points than that over the next two injury-plagued seasons combined and this merits a $1.3-million raise from a team that doesn’t even owe him anything because he has never played for it?

Evidently, it does and Stoll has the owner-friendly CBA to thank for it.

Back when the owners were supposedly putting their feet on the throats of their employees three years ago, they made a horrible mistake. And, as usual, its foundation was rooted in selfishness.

The large-market teams were dragged kicking and screaming into revenue sharing, but they placed a huge caveat on their generosity. They said the poor guys could have their money, but only if they spent to a minimum level, and the salary floor was born.

That floor is $40.7 million for this season and the Kings, woefully under the minimum, had no problem overpaying Stoll in order to get there. So they gave him a $14-million deal over the next four seasons, but will have the added cachet of having Rachel Hunter attend a good number of their home games.

Instead of giving teams the option of opting out of revenue sharing if they didn’t spend to the floor, the owners instead decided to force unnecessary spending on their colleagues. Even deposed NHL Players’ Association czar Bob Goodenow told them not to do it before the mutiny, but they did it anyway.

Related Links

And today we’re in quite a fine mess, aren’t we? The large-market teams are now spending more money in salaries and revenue-sharing payments than they were prior to the lockout and the small-market teams are spending more in salaries than they were four years ago.

And all the while, players such as Stoll are making out like bandits. Most are just being ridiculously overpaid, but Stoll is the first who is overpaid in order to help a team get up to the salary cap floor.

When NHLPA executive director Paul Kelly visits the 30 NHL teams this fall, it will make for an interesting set of meetings. He’ll ask the players whether they have any desire to opt out of the CBA.

After a couple of seconds of silence, they’ll all explode into a fit of laughter.

Ken Campbell is a senior writer for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog normally appears Tuesdays and Fridays and his column, Campbell's Cuts, appears Mondays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (29)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


daniel Posted
(2009-04-30 07:02:43)



true kings fan... you must not be:) stoll played a grip of different roles while in edmonton and greene is like a matty norstrom type player. i know you are mad like me in losing cammalleri(cancer to the locker room), and visnovsky(only god knows why). everybody was saying that the kings didn't get nothing in the deals lombardi did. i have to disagree. lombardi is going for the future and i think he is doing a good job at it. yeah he traded matty norstrom, jaroslv modry, brad stuart, cammalleri, and visnovsky. he got a total of 13 draft picks out of those trades and stoll and greene. let's just see where it takes us. handzus and calder are heavily overpaid judging by last season yes, but if this experienced coach can light a fire under them and they start playing like the old handzus and calder then watch out. it's better that lombardi went for the experienced coach anyways. why would you want to go with an unexperienced young coach with a team that hasn't proved enything yet. the kings will suprise a lot of people, so be careful what you say because you might just eat your words for dinner. and i hope you do.
    0



jqkeon14 Posted
(2009-04-30 06:56:13)



A significant reason for the rise in the cap is the rise of the Canadian dollar since the lock out to close to par with the U.S. dollar. Since one third of league revenues (a conservative estimate from league comments) are generated by the 6 Canadian teams, and the exchange rate issues are no longer relevant, it is not surprising that total league revenues are up. The owners should have accounted for the exchange rate issue in the CBA to ensure the CAP rises according to the overall popularity and organic growth of the game and not due to some outside element like exchange rates movements.
    0



I.J.B. Posted
(2009-04-30 06:55:59)



Brett Hull was bang on when he said that players are overpaid crybabies now, compared to the fact that they used to be hardworking hockey players. Does anyone know the reason why the salary cap keeps going up? Why didn't it stay at about 39 or 42 million?
    0



Flyer guy 16 Posted
(2009-04-30 06:55:59)



The cap keeps going up because the league was never in as bad a shape as they claimed.Sure, there are some teams on the brink but I don't buy that all of this revenue just appeared after the lock out. We were all scammed by the owners.
    0



whatsthatsmell Posted
(2009-04-30 06:55:57)



Everyone is right. The CBA is a complete failure. We should have another lockout so we can hammer one out that pleases everybody.
    0



The Dude Posted
(2009-04-30 06:55:52)



Well if Stoll gets this I suppose Peca is worth $5 Million a year. I can't wait for the NHL to fold and we can watch KHL on pay-per view.
    0



TRUE KINGS FAN Posted
(2009-04-30 06:55:51)



Stoll is not a key piece of the puzzle. You can not have a puzzle when its pieces from 16 different puzzles. Flat out the Kings are a MESS!! Dean is now starting his 3 season and his 6th plan for the team Year one change a 95 point team. Trade its 2 best players for picks and kids. Keep a player that was a total cancer in the locker room. Hire a coach that had no bissness being in the NHL and DAN CLOUTS Year 2 Keep that same coach. Move a bunch of players at the deadline to early and not get enough in return. OVERPAY for 5 free agents who all turn out to be busts. Give 4 mill a year to a 4th line center. Charge 11 bucks for a Sam Adams. Try and sneak in the playoffs as the 8th seed. Piss off one of your top players in Arbitration then trade hom for nothing. Win a meeningless game in Phoenix to cost you a franchise forward in the Draft and DAN CLOUTS Year 3 so far.. Trade away 2 of the teams top 5 players and let a 3rd walk. One of them by far one of the top 10 puck moving D-men in the league(like there a dime a dozen) Get CRAP in return. a 3 line player and a 7th Dman. Bring in nothing in free agency. Wait 3 months to fire a coach then say your going to hire young then hire a retread who no one was going to hire. Remeber 3 of your top 5 in the lineups are still Dave Taylor guys. Dean so far I GIVE YOU grade F Your the worst GM in the league
    0



GoKingsGo Posted
(2009-04-30 06:55:44)



Quite the discussion here today...From the perspective of a long suffering kings fan, all i have to say is that it is about time the ownership started digging into their pockets. The value of any player varies from team to team, and with the Kings, Stoll is sorely needed. So for his contract to be "inflated" is something I am not willing to say. In Detroit, he wouldn't make the same kind of money because his role would not be as important. My point is, although the CBA has its weaknesses, the same basic principles still apply. In Los Angeles, Stoll is a key piece of the puzzle. Therefore, worth more to the organization. Kudos to his agent for a great deal!
    0



Brian Kemp Posted
(2009-04-30 06:55:41)



Brian P, my mistake. I just thought I remembered the prevailing sentiment being that the owners caved in 95. Mark, the difference is, the teams you mentioned wouldn't have signed him to a 4 year deal on a gamble. They would have brought him in for a year, let him try to prove himself, and then rewarded him if they did. R.C. , the problem is, he hasn't earned his money yet. He might be worth the money at the end of the deal, but too many teams are paying guys for what they haven't earned. It's driving salaries up across the board. If he doesn't turn out to be worth the money, some player agent can still correctly point out his salary as a reason why his client, who also hasn't earned the fat paycheck yet, should get a huge raise. I'm all for paying a guy what he's worth, and I don't blame Stoll (trust me, if someone offered me the money, my response wouldn't be "I haven't earned that yet"), but GM's need to pay guys based on track record. His track record is a guy with potential and injury problems. If I had my way, the maximum salary would be a lower chunk of the total team payroll, allowing teams to keep their young stars together.
    0



Gordon Posted
(2009-04-30 06:55:36)



what has always confused me the most is how people would rather support some old rich fat man getting richer instead of the player on the ice making more. the only way i support smaller player salaries is if the NHL made a ticket price cap where people that make an average wage could afford to go more than once every season. until then i hope the players salaries go so high that the NHL ownership makes not a penny. the owners and betman have made the NHL a second rate league over the last ten years.
    0



1 2 3

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Who should start in goal for Russia at the Olympics?






THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I was coming in to take the boards away and had some good jump. He bobbled the puck at the last second and I don’t think he saw me coming at all. It was a shoulder right in his chest. He’s eight feet tall, so it’s not like you could hit him in the head.”

- Ottawa's Chris Neil about a hit he threw on Tampa's Victor Hedman Thursday night, causing Hedman to leave the game.

Our Partners