• Print

THN.com Blog: A helpful hockey glossary

Sean Avery of the Dallas Stars throws out the ceremonial first pitch before a game between the New York Yankees and the Texas Rangers on Aug. 6, 2008 at Rangers Ballpark in Arlington, Texas. (Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Sean Avery of the Dallas Stars throws out the ceremonial first pitch before a game between the New York Yankees and the Texas Rangers on Aug. 6, 2008 at Rangers Ballpark in Arlington, Texas. (Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)

One of the surest signs you’ve fully transitioned to adulthood occurs when a person who is your junior says or writes something to you that’s presumably based in your first language, yet you have no idea what he or she is trying to communicate.

Instant and text messaging has done a lot to accentuate the rift between generations in recent years. Just the other day I got an email from a co-worker who’s only a handful of years younger than I am. It included the sentence, “have a good mtg!”

Now, I’ve heard the letters “MGD” associated with good times before, but this was a new one. Turns out I was supposed to have an enjoyable meeting.

Like the kids, sports have always featured inclusive jargon and hockey is no exception. A fellow hockey fan can follow along when you start talking about five-holes, but somebody out of the puck loop might think you’re alluding to a quintet of non-desirables.

Jargon is often driven by those who bring the game to us via TV and radio. Late great Habs play-by-play caller Danny Gallivan coined phrases such as “cannonating” and “spin-o-rama” that didn’t reside in any dictionary, but still resonated with listeners.

In recent years, crack analyst Pierre McGuire has taken existing words and enthusiastically applied them to hockey, hence “monster!” and “human eraser!” have become part of the sport’s vernacular.

But as I’ve been forced to contemplate certain seemingly random alignments of letters on my phone and in my inbox recently, I got to wondering if there are any new and/or occasional hockey fans out there who could use a little glossary to help translate some of the game’s potentially befuddling terms.

Let’s clarify a few…

Puck Distribution is the term employed to describe the action of one player using his stick to transfer possession of the puck to a teammate. It was once known as “passing.” In recent years, confused fans had assumed that because hockey was forged in Canada, a country proud of its social welfare traditions, puck distribution referred to some obscure law entitling every Canadian citizen to a minimum of 0.04 ounces of frozen rubber to call their own.

Related Links

Quiet Ice is a phrase used to characterize a sliver of playing surface goal-scorers love to find because it’s unguarded by opposing players and can be used to rip off a good, quick shot. It is not, as some had understandably assumed, a reference to any place where Sean Avery isn’t.

While quiet ice usually refers to only a small piece of unoccupied ice, the Weak Side details a larger chunk of real estate that is largely unpopulated because it’s opposite the spot where players are fighting for control of the puck. Previously, some fans were under the impression weak side just described whatever half of the ice Jonas Hoglund was on. 

The Toe Drag is a move executed by soft-handed players whereby they use the tip – or ‘toe’ – of their stick blade to deftly pull the puck closer to their body. This not only creates a small gap between the shooter and defender, it also slightly alters the angle of attack. Players capable of using this maneuver to perfection quickly become familiar with the Dough Snag, a slick move their agents teach them when it’s time for a new contract.

Agitator is the term applied to a breed of player characterized by his willingness to use what is typically an average-sized body and over-sized mouth to goad opposing players into stupid penalties by any means necessary. Prior incarnations of this type of player were simply known as “jerks” or, well, replace the five in five-hole with…

Ryan Dixon is a writer and copy editor for The Hockey News magazine, the co-author of the book Hockey's Young Guns and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog normally appears Wednesdays and his column, Top Shelf, appears every other Friday.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (14)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


DGL Posted
(2009-04-30 06:50:29)



" physicality " You missed one, the most irritating one of all in the last year or so. drives me nuts. Put people on the air who don't spend their time recreating the english language. At least when Danny Gallivan did it he only used those few words, he didn't feel the need to amend the whole dictionary.
    0



Flyerfan52 Posted
(2009-04-30 06:50:06)



The easy answer is to turn off the sound. The disc isn't hard to follow. Even the best players telegraph their moves if you're watching the camera angles.
    0



McGuire hater Posted
(2009-04-30 06:50:00)



Pierre McGuire is without a doubt the most annoying man to ever hold a microphone to his mouth (excluding rappers) and how anyone can listen to him talk without wanting to put their fist through the TV screen is beyond me. I'm sure he's the one who started "puck distribution" because "pass" was too simple and not as impressive-sounding. I hate how a guy makes a simple, textbook play and all of a sudden he's a "FUNDAMENTALLY SOUND MONSTER" or something similar. And when he's doing any international games, his Canadian bias is downright embarrassing. I've heard him accuse the Russians of diving way too many times. And if someone scores a goal on Canada, well, just give him a box of Kleenex to dry his tears while he blames something else. "Gord, that goal happened because the referee dropped the puck on an angle so that when it hit the ice surface, the bounce transported it to the American/Swedish/Finnish player. The referees are obviously against the Canadians here, Gord." I'm Canadian and all for the red and white, but come on, the stuff he gets on with is ridiculous. Get him off the air.
    0



Chris Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:58)



Pierre Mcguire is a tool.
    0



Brian Sumner Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:58)



Pierre overrated??? try Mike Emerick, it was bad enough he replaced a legend in Gene Hart, but now i have to listen to him in national televised games, is painful, for the longest time, he kept calling Mike Richards, Brad Richards. Scotty87, what are you thinking. Macquire is a great analyst.
    0



Kent B Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:57)



Commentator would be the colour commentator, the analyst (Harry Neale, Pierre Mcguire), the announcer would be the play by play guy. (Bob Cole)
    0



Flyer guy 16 Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:56)



Pierre is smart, funny, and personable. He just yells too much!!!
    0



dave Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:54)



to scotty87 comment: Have you ever even watched him? He knows his hockey! ...not as much as don cherry mind you but he still knows alot ;)
    0



Ryan Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:52)



It's a good thing he's not a commentator, not an announcer, and when he's allowed to talk real hockey he's got one of the most analytical minds on TV. His insight into strategy is unreal, especially when he's breaking down coaching decisions mid-game; it's when the producers keep him talking about which players look hurt that he becomes just another talking head.
    0



Ryan Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:52)



Pardon me, IS a commentator, not an announcer.
    0




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners