• Print

THN.com Blog: Three teams that will underachieve in 2009

Chris Drury and Scott Gomez will lead the Rangers, while young guys like Marc Staal will take on bigger roles. (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Chris Drury and Scott Gomez will lead the Rangers, while young guys like Marc Staal will take on bigger roles. (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

At the beginning of the season – even in the months leading up to it – no one is shy about making bold predictions about their favorite team.

“No one gives them any credit. They are better than you think. You’ll see in April. You’ll all see!”

But what happens when that know-it-all is proven to be a loudmouth? When his team is eliminated in, say, February, does he make an appearance? No, not usually. Instead he’ll hibernate in his den, waiting for the off-season where wishful thinking can once again reign supreme.

That, or jump on someone else’s bandwagon, though who would admit to that?

But every now and again those bold predictions pay off and the one who seemingly ran off at the mouth in August comes off feeling like a genius, even if it took 20 tries before the annual bold prediction rang true.

So, to follow up on last week’s blog about which teams I think have the means and potential to overachieve in 2008-09, here are a few teams I think will take a step back, leaving some loyal followers to chew on their words this winter.

Montreal Canadiens: Let me guess, a few of the more prickly Habs fans will take exception to this one and point to a prediction that missed last summer. So old, so boring. These guys must make a killing reading palms and tarot cards. Though I wonder, are they the same ones who claimed the Habs would win the Stanley Cup?

I think anyone who is already handing the East’s regular season title to Montreal needs to take off their blinders, because this is a team that played way over its head last season.

Sure, the Canadiens are talented and I’d be surprised if they missed the playoffs, but I don’t think they’ll finish with home-ice advantage again this season. If the Habs proved anything in last year’s playoffs it’s that they weren’t as good as their regular season record indicated.

While Carey Price is the next great young goalie, he isn’t there yet and if he continues to have issues with his glove hand, Montreal will have issues beating their conference’s big bangers. The one huge plus they have going for them, though, is Alex Kovalev is playing for a contract…so look out.

Minnesota Wild: They could be like the New Jersey Devils in that despite losing a few big-ticket names to free agency, their tried and tested defensive system carries them into the post-season.

Related Links

Then again, they don’t have anyone who can match Martin Brodeur’s dominance.

The Wild lost a huge part of its two-way game in Brian Rolston and some helpful scoring punch in Pavol Demitra and Mark Parrish. The Wild will always be defense-first under coach Jacques Lemaire, which leads me to question a couple of the additions the team made on the back end.

Marek Zidlicky and Marc-Andre Bergeron aren’t known for their defense, but will certainly help a power play that won’t have much luster to begin with. The Northwest Division might end up scoring the fewest goals this season, which ultimately could play into the Wild’s hands, though I think the team has lost too much “umph” to keep themselves propped up in a playoff slot.

New York Rangers: I didn’t like much of what the Rangers did this off-season and I couldn’t figure out why a team that was so close to being a legitimate conference champion contender would re-shape its image.

It goes back to that old, simple saying; “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

Jaromir Jagr and Martin Straka went back to Europe, Brendan Shanahan still hasn’t been invited back, Nikolai Zherdev – host of a notoriously bad attitude and work ethic – was added for a steep price that included under-appreciated defender Fedor Tyutin and finally Sean Avery, love him or hate him, was lost for nothing to free agency.

It’s time for Scott Gomez and Chris Drury to call this team their own, which is all well and good for them, but the team simply doesn’t have the same make-up for success it did last season. It seems to me the Rangers have a few more ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’ that could have their fans choking on candy and nuts by Christmas.

Still, in goalie Henrik Lundqvist, the Rangers have one of the best back-stoppers in the game, so he should be able to lead them back to the second season, though New York will find themselves having to win big games in April to make it that far.

Rory Boylen is THN.com's web content specialist. His blog appears Thursdays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (82)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Vincent Martucci Posted
(2009-04-30 07:10:59)



Those were great comments by a so called expert of the game. Just look at the start the NEW rangers have gotten off to--5 wins in 5 games with veterans and the young kids blending to really form a team believing in themselves. This team is a winner and will be a Stanley cup contender this year and for years to come--God bless America
    0



5 4 fighting Posted
(2009-04-30 06:51:31)



Rangers will do better this year after a slow start. Their D has improved both in terms of offensive and defensive performances.Upgrades Redden and Kalinin over departed Tyutin and Backman and both Redden and Kalinin will play on the PP-also upgrading that unit. Nasland and Zherdev will produce the same as Jagr and Straka and will compliment Drury and Gomez in their styles of play.The only loss will be that of Avery but being a part time player last year I believe the kids Callahan/Dawes/Dubinsky will step it up.Fritsche will be a good two way player as well.
    0



Braden Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:31)



I'll be looking for a hell of a lot more than 15 goals from Zherdev. This guy needs to step it up now! I think Redden could still be a very good defenseman. Give Drury the C. What a player. Scores countless huge impact goals and works hard every shift. Great on faceoffs, solid on defense. Averages better than 20 goals a season over his entire career.
    0



andrew st amant Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:29)



I would like to point one thing out that many people fail to realise about Wade Redded, it is not uncommon for a defensemans numbers to decrease offensively when he has no confidence in teh guy defending the cage, a defenseman needs to feel confident that any mishap that the guy behind him will be able to make the save. Ottawa has not had a legitimate and solid goaltender (minus the months that emery proved decent) since Hasek signed redden`s plus minus, points total and apparent redcution in defensive ability can all be traced back to the horrible goaltending that ottawa saw last year.. the rangers on teh otehr hadn finishjed tops in teh league in defense and won a lot of games even with a less then potent offense.. redden will be a great fit and all those fools who still seem to focus on the dollar ammounts will eat your words.. also look for the offense to be much better as it will be much more spread out perhaps naslund , drury, gomez, (hopefully shanny), Dawes, Duby, and Zherdev wont score 100 points each but Ill take 15 to 30 goals from each of them ...
    0



Sean Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:27)



I got a little farther this time "pushing the series to 7 games -- by the end of that series the two teams were clearly on the same level". Game 7 was indeed a classic - what was the final score again?
    0



Swedish Dangler Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:24)



He lost me at "Michael Ryder - 30 goals". Have this guy seen him the last two years? Or maybe no top-end player at any position. Because Andrei Markov and Mike Komisarek are so much worse then Chara. And because Kovalev, Chris Higgins and all those prospects on offense just are so much worse then...Glen Murray? And because Tim Thomas is one of the top 10 prospects in the game, and a technically sound goalkeeper which never goes of the rails. Never. So they played a 7-game play-off series. Oh, and in the 7-game series. Which team won?
    0



Sean Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:22)



You lost me at "the Bruins had more points than the Habs EXCEPT . . . ". Like the Loafs, the Bruins will never win another Stanley cup in our lifetime. Sad but true.
    0



bostonblueline.blogspot.com Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:11)



It's real simple, folks. Last season the Bruins had more points than the Habs EXCEPT that Montreal swept the season series 8-0. Ouch. BUT... the Bruins outworked the Habs in the playoffs, pushing the series to 7 games -- by the end of that series the two teams were clearly on the same level. In the offseason the Bruins add Ryder (should be a 30-goal scorer), Patrice Bergeron (remember him? their leading scorer injured all last season), and Manny Fernandez (remember him? their starting goaltender injured all last season). The Habs add Alex Tanguay (20 goals) and Georges Laraque (20 games worth of PIM). So it's fair to say that this season the Bruins could be expected to split the season series, barring any dramatic changes on either team. Furthermore it's VERY safe to say the Bruins will win 3-5 more games minimum due to major roster upgrades. 3 more wins + split season series = Habs in second place. It's unfathomable, I know, because the Canadiens are automatically the best team in the league every season. But the reality is that they have no top-end player at any position. They've got decent depth but that only goes so far. bostonblueline.blogspot.com
    0



mitchell rodgers Posted
(2009-04-30 06:49:06)



i think that you could actually put the habs in both your under acheving teams and your overachieving teams. this is a young team who played great during the season but got out worked in the playoffs. yes they did "overachieved" last season, but now there better so if they continue to "overachieve" they very well may win the cup but if they don't and play only whats expected of them i think that they will "underachieve"
    0



Lari Mitchell Posted
(2009-04-30 06:48:55)



So Rory, you are saying that the Habs will finish no better than 5th their Conference? I'll take that bet. Really, I mean it, Bob. Reply to me and tell me we're on, say for $ 5.00 bucks to make it accessible and sporting. We'll see who has bragging rights at the end of the year? Or maybe you don't get paid for writing your blog ...? And by the way, when you try and dismiss last year's THN prediction of the Habs finishing last, you sound like you don't want to take responsibility for your comments. I'll take responsibility for mine: Habs no worse than 2nd in their conference.
    0



1 2 3 ...7 8 9

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners