• Print

THN.com Blog: Is superstar indecision a new trend?

Will Mats Sundin return to the NHL or ride into the sunset? (Photo by Dave Sandford/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Will Mats Sundin return to the NHL or ride into the sunset? (Photo by Dave Sandford/Getty Images)

During a year in which Brett Favre retired then notoriously unretired, a handful of NHL stars are taking prolonged periods of time before making/announcing their decisions.

The Scott Niedermayer Should I Stay or Should I Go Show, like most sequels, had a mercifully shorter run than the original. The Teemu Selanne, Joe Sakic and Mats Sundin dramas, conversely, are lingering like uranium.

It all begs the question: why the new trend of lengthy navel gazing?

I put the question to some of my colleagues and we came up with the following:

1.    Some superstars don’t want to tarnish their legacies and would prefer to retire at the top of their games. The summer gives them time to determine if their bodies are up to the challenge.

2.    They don’t want to rush to judgment, and live to regret it, a la Favre.

3.    They’d really prefer not to play, but the dollars they’re leaving on the table are far too enticing.

4.    Like most of us who’ve been badly hungover and vowed never to touch alcohol again, we eventually forget the bad and only remember the good. Mmmmm. Beer.

5.    They only want to play half-a-season and will announce they’re coming back in December – see Selanne and Niedermayer from last season.

6.    They soon realize hockey is the only thing at which they’re among the world’s elite at and the idea of becoming a mere mortal is mortifying.

7.    After spending a few months with the wife and kids, they realize how easy they had it as pampered professional athletes. Or as Jimmy Kimmel put it recently, they realize how much they don’t like their families.

Related Links

Whatever the case – and we understand the reasons vary from athlete to athlete – the impact in a salary cap world is undeniable: it messes with team budgets and personnel decision-making.

A club hoping to land, let’s say Sundin, earmarks X-million for him, then is forced to decide whether to save that cash and cap space on a “what if” or pursue another player. Those who hesitate could lose out on Plan B.

Moreover, the uncertainty messes with fans and their emotional investments in their local favorites (not to mention the stress it places on hockey magazine editors who have Yearbook deadlines fast approaching).

What to do about it? Not much. How do you make an unrestricted free agent declare his intentions for the following season by July 1 without a provision in the CBA? And that’s not happening anytime soon.

No, it’s the status quo for the foreseeable future, leaving teams to decide whether to spend elsewhere or wait; leaving fans to twist and pout; and leaving editors to increase their daily Gaviscon consumption.

Jason Kay is the editor in chief of The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears every weekend.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (34)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Karlie Posted
(2009-04-30 06:41:04)



The NHL season is way too long and grinding, and the superstars are telling us in their not so suttle way.
    0



Flyerfan52 Posted
(2009-04-30 06:41:02)



It was just an example. I could have used Bure or Yashin instead. I've got nothing against Eric as he gave a a few years of interesting hockey & Clarke has been one of my all time favorites.
    0



t-murder Posted
(2009-04-30 06:40:57)



Flyersfan you have Super-stardom confused with All-time status. Lindros was a Superstar practically before he hit the ice. You have to let your grudge against Eric, his Dad, and Clarkie(god bless his heart) go. Trust me you will feel better when you do, I know i did.
    0



Flyerfan52 Posted
(2009-04-30 06:40:45)



Grant44, Lindros had about 300 points in his first 3 years too. And that was when they allowed hitting in the NHL. Hart & Pearson trophies, multiple time All-Star. 3 years do not make a SUPER star! On the Sundin/Selanne/Sakic thing, they are UFAs and therefore not required to be signed by a specific date.
    0



Rob M Posted
(2009-04-30 06:40:36)



I agree Jan and that is why I think that the Ducks did not repeat last year. Their chemistry was brutal and although on paper it was the same team that won the cup, something was missing and you do have to feel bad for the guys that tried out. And John read the Ducks team stats before Neidermeyer and Selanne came back and then after. Also Selanne's 25 points in 26 games I would consider that a pretty good season. The rest of your rant I would agree with.
    0



John Posted
(2009-04-30 06:40:35)



You guys are all ridiculous complainers. "Not fair to the player who gets cut because Sundin wants to play." Cry me a river, Sundin is under contract to no one and has no obligations to any team. He has already stated that if he plays again he'll be there from the start of training camp unlike those lazy Ducks last year who didn't want to put in the work and training they should have and had bad seasons because of it. Sundin will certainly bump a player if he plays, but it won't be mid-season, it will be the same as any UFA going to a new team. There is no rule in the NHL saying players have to sign in the first 14 days of free agency because hockey fans are impatient crybabies.
    0



jan Posted
(2009-04-30 06:40:34)



The players should be given a reasonable deadline to make a decision whether they want to play another year. I feel bad for the guy who shows up to camp, earns a spot on the team, plays well for that team, then is told "you've been traded or you're going to the AHL because so-and-so has decided he now wants to play." That can't be good for team chemisty, can it?
    0



Rob M Posted
(2009-04-30 06:40:33)



Don't give Niedermeyer or Selanne a hard time about last season, it was obviously a plan to see how well the team could do without them and to prevent them from getting injured by only playing half seasons and making a strong playoff run. Didn't work out, but I don't believe it was entirely their decision to take half a year off. Selanne will probably retire that is why hasn't said anything yet and I would say same as Sakic. I could care less about what Sundin does because if he stays in Toronto the team is still useless. If he goes to Vancouver the team is still useless and if he goes to Montreal they will have wasted their money on him, because they are good enough without him.
    0



Grant44 Posted
(2009-04-30 06:40:31)



FlyersFan52 - Ovy, Sid, & Malkin not superstars yet? Sid & Ovy about 300 pts each in their first 3 yrs. Malkin almost 200 pts in his first 2 yrs. 2 MVP's, 2 scoring titles, & 2 rookies-of-the-yr among the 3 players. Ask the guys who play against them if they think these 3 are superstars!
    0



Brian Kemp Posted
(2009-04-30 06:40:31)



sabresfan1, how exactly does Sundin suck? He's a point a game, plus player who spent the bulk of his prime years playing in the clutch and grab era. He's also spent most of his prime years with little to no support playing for the Maple Leafs. His post season numbers are only slightly lower than his regular season numbers, and the Leafs haven't made the playoffs since the lockout. His post season career occured, with the exception of 92-93, during the worst of the trap period, when no one could score, and yet he did. He's a 500 goal scorer, put up over 1300 points (so far), deserves serious consideration for the Hall of Fame when his playing days are over, so really, how exactly does he suck?
    0



1 2 3 4

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners