• Print

Top Shelf: B’s should have Boston fans buzzing

The return of Patrice Bergeron will surely add extra scoring punch to the Bruins lineup next season. (Photo by Phillip MacCallum/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

The return of Patrice Bergeron will surely add extra scoring punch to the Bruins lineup next season. (Photo by Phillip MacCallum/Getty Images)

There’s one Garden out there I’m expecting to see some growth in this winter.

The Boston Bruins surprised just about everyone by making the playoffs last year and nearly upped the ante to astonishment when they fell just short of upsetting the heavily favored Montreal Canadiens in the first round.

For one of the few times since they moved to TD Banknorth Garden from ‘The Gah-den,’ the Black and Gold are emitting signs of long-term progress.

Everybody knows about the Bruins’ commitment to defense. It starts with coach Claude Julien’s teachings, filters down through Zdeno Chara’s wingspan and touches every corner of the dressing room.

That Boston will play a stingy game is a given. Where I see the B’s branching out, though, is on the attack. Only New Jersey and the Islanders celebrated fewer goals than Boston’s 212 last year, a number that’s sure to improve with the return of one player, the addition of another and the natural progression of two youngsters.

Reports indicate center Patrice Bergeron is on course to return healthy and hungry after a hit from behind by Philadelphia’s Randy Jones limited his season to 10 games last year.

In case you’ve forgotten about this fella, he’s the 23-year-old who scored 73 and 70 points in the first two post-lockout years while playing on non-playoff teams.    

His presence in the lineup will take pressure of No. 1 pivot Marc Savard, who should enjoy feeding passes to free agent pickup Michael Ryder.

Now, let me be clear about this: No contract handed out this summer better exemplifies the utter contempt NHL GMs have for using common sense during free agency than Ryder’s. That he received a three-year deal worth $4 million per after the scratchy, 14-goal year he put up in Montreal is absolutely criminal. But it’s also just a byproduct of the crooked lay of the land.

And Ryder, for all his struggles last year, hasn’t forgotten how to shoot the puck. Goal-scorers run on confidence and if Ryder can snap a few pucks past goalies early on, there’s no reason to believe he can’t finish the year with 25 or 30 goals. On a team led by Marco Sturm’s 27 tallies last year, that’s a big help.

As for improvement from within, Phil Kessel and David Krejci offer the most intriguing possibilities.

Krejci hasn’t spent much time on anybody’s radar yet, but the 22-year-old Czech has moves and touch. As a rookie last year, the majority of his production came late in the season when the B’s were pushing for a playoff spot.
Krejci had a stretch of nine points in five games as the regular season came to a close and his five points in seven playoff games was second only to Savard’s six on the Bruins. The second-rounder from 2004 clearly has potential.

Related Links

Kessel, meanwhile, is approaching a crossroads.

The kid once pegged as a surefire No. 1 overall pick has to become a productive top-six forward in what will be his third year in the NHL. Watch Kessel and you know where the lofty projections once came from. He’s fast –, really fast – and he’s got a quick, accurate wrist shot.

But the kid doesn’t exactly exude commitment and that has landed him in Julien’s bad books more than once. He was a healthy scratch in three of Boston’s playoff games, but scored a team-leading three goals in the four contests he did get into. That inconsistency pretty much sums up his career to this point.

If Kessel, who won’t turn 21 until October, can find a way to iron out the wrinkles and burn more than he coasts, he’s going to be a player in this league.

With a natural spike in goals on the way and an unwavering pledge to team defense, the only big question left for the Bruins surrounds what kind of goaltending they will get.

Between Tim Thomas, Manny Fernandez (remember him?) and 21-year-old Finnish prospect Tuukka Rask, my guess is it will be somewhere between competent and good.

Bundle that all up and it’s easy to see why Boston will have something to say about how the Eastern Conference standings shake down.

Ryan Dixon is a writer and copy editor for The Hockey News magazine, the co-author of the book Hockey's Young Guns and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Wednesdays and his column, Top Shelf, appears Fridays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (115)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Scott Esposito Posted
(2009-04-30 06:44:29)



Bergeron is a big "if" - if he can stay healthy he will be an asset. Problem is, as with so many other players who have suffered severe concussions, they don't stick around very long. And if they do manage to stick around, they aren't nearly the force they were prior to suffering a concussion (see: Mike Richter and Eric Lindros). ... Ryder probably will improve under Julien; the two have had success together before. ... Goaltending will be key for the B's. They aren't going to seriously contend with Tim Thomas as their No. 1. They had better hope Manny Fernandez comes back strong. ... As for nearly knocking off the No. 1 seed last year, please. The B's and Habs are such fierce rivals, seeds shouldn't matter. Besides, Montreal lacked strong goaltending vs. the Flyers. I wouldn't read too much into last year's playoffs.
    0



Sean Posted
(2009-04-30 06:44:09)



There will be approximately 30 teams contending for the Stanley Cup this season. Conservatively speaking, I predict the Bruins will be in the top 20.
    0



J Wald Posted
(2009-04-30 06:43:58)



You guys are talking about all the wrong things. I think I'm make a conservative prediction when I say that the Bruins will contend for a Stanley Cup this year. Add a healthy Bergeron, a born sniper in Ryder, and a Kessel who is a year more mature to a team that almost knocked off the number one seed this year, and you've got a recipe for an eastern conference roast.
    0



Scott Esposito Posted
(2009-04-30 06:42:08)



KEN: In the three years since the lockout, the Bruins have ranked 14th, 7th and 8th among team payrolls. In the four seasons prior to the lockout, the Bruins ranked 17th (2000-01, $31.8 M payroll), 11th (01-02, $41.8), 11th (02-03, $44) and 12th (03-04, $46.5). Boston's payroll jumped from $36.6M in 2005-06 (14th in the NHL) to $49.5M last season (8th in the NHL). SOURCE: http://content.usatoday.com/sports/hockey/nhl/salaries/default.aspx.
    0



Scott Esposito Posted
(2009-04-30 06:42:08)



TOM: You have every right to agree with Ken if you like. The problem is, Ken called me an idiot and yet he's the one who's the idiot because he doesn't have his facts straight before he posts. For a long time, the Bruins haven't spent money to fortify their team. They spent a measley $31.8 million in payroll in 2000-01. That's CHEAP for a team located in a good size market. That's Jacobs daring fans to stay away, knowing the nearest NHL city to Boston (at the time) was NY. The fact of the matter is, the Bruins may be spending at - or, more likely - close to the cap NOW, since the lockout. But the total payroll hasn't increased by much. Just look at the numbers in my post to Ken.
    0



Scott Esposito Posted
(2009-04-30 06:42:08)



Ken and Tom, here's more fact to back my "Jacobs is a cheapskate" claim (note the description of "tight-fisted" Forbes uses to describe Jacobs: http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/31/biz_06nhl_Boston-Bruins_313364.html
    0



Scott Esposito Posted
(2009-04-30 06:42:08)



Sorry to present so many FACTS. I just hate being called names by ignorant fools.
    0



Sean Posted
(2009-04-30 06:41:33)



Regarding the Thornton deal - Primeau was a throw in, but Marco Sturm is the B's leading scorer, and Stuart just helped the Wings win the Stanley Cup. This reminds me of Ken Campbells piece on Jay Bouwmeester. If you're surrounded by crap you get crap results. Thornton's on a better team now, his point production is impressive, yet the Sharks will never win a Stanley Cup behind Big Joe.
    0



Tom Posted
(2009-04-30 06:41:24)



I agree with Ken...they spend the $$ now and are building a good young team. The Thornton deal was bogus..but blame Mike OConnell for that, they could have gotten much more.
    0



Ken Posted
(2009-04-30 06:41:23)



Scott- the Bruins spend to the cap every season. How does that make them cheap? Idiot.
    0



1 2 3 ...10 11 12

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners