Joe Sakic skates against the Detroit Red Wings during Game Four of the Western Conference Semifinal. (Photo by Doug Pensinger/Getty Images)
Adam Proteau
2008-07-22 13:14:57
For me, one of the great things about a vacation is it usually leads to a nice drive along an Ontario highway where I can be alone with my thoughts and introspect for a few blissful hours.
Since I just finished a week’s vacation, I wanted to start off this mailbag column – by the way, note the new day; we’re switching from Fridays to Tuesdays until hockey is back – by revealing what I learned about myself this time. Here it is:
Were I given the choice between (a) never again having to hear Bob Seger’s “Old Time Rock And Roll”, and (b) ending forever the existence of all mosquitoes, the decision would haunt me for the rest of my life.
Speaking of tough decisions (segue alert!), it’s getting more and more difficult to choose just five or six inquiries for each column, given the fact that your questions continue to flow in like a band of salmon leaping furiously upstream to spawn in cold water.
(Okay, so my metaphorical skills are as rusty as, um, a band of salmon leaping furiously upstream to spawn in cold water. Sue me.)
Adam,
Do players take into account the cost of living in each city when signing a free agent contract? (For example: the same contract will buy more and have greater value in a city such as Edmonton than it would in New York.)
Daniel Deshe, Columbus
Daniel,
I wouldn’t go so far as to say every NHLer is wise enough to understand the concept of cost-of-living differential; after all, this is a league that employs “non-insane automatons.”
However, each and ever player agent worthy of his NHLPA accreditation makes their client aware of all circumstances that can affect his bottom line.
Adam,
Will Joe Sakic come back? If he doesn't, what will the Avs do to fill the void? Also, do you like the Avs’ new look with Darcy Tucker and is there still a hole in the goalie area?
Thanks,
Chris Stone, Denver
Chris,
According to a couple broadcaster pals in the Denver area, the sense around the Avs is still positive when it comes to the possibility of Sakic returning. And I’m sure I speak for every member of that team when I say you don’t replace what he brings to the organization.
Do I like what Colorado has done this off-season? Chris, I’m trying to be nicer this summer. Don’t make me not be by giving you a truthful answer.
I will say that, if people are expecting Tucker to be the catalyst that elevates the team’s performance, odds are they’ll be sadly mistaken. Tucker can be a significant auxiliary player, but his age and broken-down body suggest that’s about the limit for him now.
And that goaltending tandem? Peter Budaj and Andrew Raycroft? Yikes. Where have you gone, David Aebischer?
Hey Adam!
Great column; always interesting and informative. Two questions for you:
First, I may be wrong, but somehow it feels as if NHL players are more on the move than in other sports. How does the massive turnover of players from team to team under the salary cap structure in the NHL compare to that of the other three major professional sports in North America? With all this movement, I'm curious.
Second, how do you think this many players changing teams affects team chemistry, especially in light of the fact that so many are short term "rental" players.
Thanks! Keep up our favorite THN column.
Mike Jones, Philadelphia
Hey Mike,
Certainly, player movement from team-to-team in the NHL has picked up since the lockout. But I don’t believe it’s close to the turnover seen in the NFL, where you need at least 10 Megabytes of RAM (don’t ask me what that means) to follow a single team’s transactions in any one off-season.
Without taking the time (time I don’t have) to compare numbers, I’d harbor a guess the NHL is closer to Major League Baseball or the NBA in that regard.
How does that affect player chemistry? Not much, I think; these guys are used to changing faces and mix-and-match personalities since their earliest playing days, so they’ve developed a thick skin by the time they make it to the NHL.
Hey Adam,
I was just curious about your opinions regarding the Michael Ryder acquisition by the Bruins.
Do you think that he will have a comeback season under Claude Julien? Who do you think his linemates should be? And finally, do you think that the Bruins will be competitive and maybe pass to the second round of the playoffs this season?
Bobby C., Montreal
Hey Bobby,
I’ve already made clear my belief that Ryder’s contract, at least, in principle, is beyond the pale – not to mention, a backhanded slap in the face to fellow Bruin Marco Sturm.
Could Ryder enjoy a resurgence thanks to this reunion with his old coach? Far stranger things have happened. But I’m sure you’ll forgive my skepticism that it will happen, especially on a team that had the seventh-worst offense in the league last season.
His ideal linemates? Well, if Ryder can’t score alongside Marc Savard or a healthy Patrice Bergeron, he can’t score at all.
And yes, I do think the potential is there for Boston to get as far as the second round of the playoffs in 2009. They almost beat Montreal in the first round last season and they should be more familiar with one another (read: better) in ’08-09.
Adam,
You are so wrong about the Redden contract. As a loyal Blueshirts fan, I love the idea of Redden and our other elite defenseman Michal Rozsival combining to make nearly $12 million next year.
That No. 1 pair is nothing compared to elite game-breaker Markus Naslund, who is primed to score 18 big goals and 47 HUGE points for us and make us forget that Jagr dude.
If that isn't enough, since those three guys make up, like, I don't know, two thirds of our cap space, you are going to be shocked and awed by the precocious Petr Prucha flying up and down the wing on our FIRST LINE. Watch out, NHL, here come the Rangers.
(I will now drop the radio into my bathtub. God, I hope I don't miss).
Jim Mauceri, Staten Island, N.Y.
Jim,
See, this is why I could never be one of those people who hates New Yorkers. You guys do sarcasm as well as anybody.
And I couldn’t agree more with you regarding your team’s off-season moves. Does anyone feel truly confident guaranteeing the Rangers will make the playoffs next year? Not this cat.
Hey Adam,
Can you tell me what's going on with some teams and why they have so many forwards signed?
Tampa and the Rangers have about 15-16 NHL quality forwards signed and I see a few more teams have 13-14 forwards that could play any night and not be out of place. Are these teams expecting to package some players in trades?
The same could be said for Florida, Pittsburgh and Carolina and their depth on D. Whatever happened to depth from the minors? Are we in line for a bunch of minor deals leading up to training camps?
Chris McElwain, Vancouver, B.C.
Hey Chris,
There usually are a few deals completed around the beginning of camp and this year should be no different.
To be sure, some teams still are a work-in-progress. Tampa Bay bigwig Brian Lawton has already publicly admitted as much; and, in addition to the franchises you’ve mentioned, teams such as Phoenix, Toronto and Minnesota also have some extra bodies around that will need relocating.
Minor league depth is a much tougher achievement in the salary cap era, simply because low-level players either are perpetually moving to an NHL team that can give them even the slightest raise, or they’re plying their trades in a European pro league that can provide them a significant bump in salary.
Ask Adam appears Tuesdays in the summer only on The Hockey News.com. To send us your question or comment, click HERE.
Adam Proteau is The Hockey News' online columnist and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Mondays and Wednesdays and his column, Screen Shots, appears Thursdays.
For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.
Scott Patterson (Posted 2008-07-24 01:02:51)
Hey Adam, what team do you think is the odds on favorite to win the Sundin sweepstakes, and why?
bostongm (Posted 2008-07-23 19:09:28)
@montreal gm.....i agree with most of what you said. Ryder BETTER play well!! 4 million for 14 goals is a disgrace. The real GM got fleeced in the "negotiations" if you want to call it that. I dont agree with the Murray comparison. Murray is 36 years old. Ryder is 28 years old. HUGE difference. Murray had a very good slap shot. Ryder has a very accurate wrist shot. Ryder SHOULD gel with Savard. Savard is an upgrade at center for him over Montreals centers. Savard is a legit play-making master. Just imagine him playing with Ryder!!! I'm also very proud that Ray Bourque won the cup with the Avs. I would rather him win the cup than not win the cup. My old gm actually approached 77 back then. It was not 77 that requested a trade.
Montreal GM (Posted 2008-07-23 17:26:34)
Here's to Boston GM: seriously and frankly, be prepared with Ryder for a streaky kind of player. Playing along side of Bergeron or Savard won't hurt his ability to score 25-30 goals again. However, and hopefully for your team, Michael Ryder will show a greater commitment to hockey (damn, with 4 million $ a year, he better do so!!!) than he did last season with Montreal. Fact of the matter is, Michael Ryder does not play sound hockey at both end of the ice. He will make Bruins fans forget very quickly Glen Murray...or maybe not because Ryder is most definitely the exact same kind of player!!! I so look forward to another first playoff round between Boston and Montreal: Boston will not push around Montreal like they did last playoff with a bigger and tougher Montreal line-up! (N.B. no wonder HOF Ray Bourque wanted out of Boston in order to win the cup!)
JackTheHat (Posted 2008-07-23 15:09:03)
Matt, I've never read an article on this site saying for Sundin to hurry up and make his choice, and also, maybe people think guys like Sakic and Shanahan have the right to take as long as they want (within reason of course). Those two have actually won things with/for their teams in the past, what has Sundin done? Be aware that I'm not bashing Sundin, because he has never had the opportunity to really win anything with Toronto, well, with the exception of making the Eastern Conference Final twice and losing (correct me if it was only once, I don't tend to follow Toronto).
bostongm (Posted 2008-07-23 12:47:40)
I DID read the article.......it just "forgot" about Krejci. Thats all i'm saying. I also know that Savard and Bergeron are exceptional centers. Maybe its YOU that needs to read the posts better.
Matt (Posted 2008-07-23 11:01:03)
I'd like to know why Sundin gets all the negative backlash from impatient fans when Sakic and Shanahan are out there taking their time making a decision too. Everyone thinks Sundin needs to make his choice sooner rather than later just because he plays for a popular team, and if he doesn't its because he has a huge ego and thinks he special....... give me a break.
nsboi (Posted 2008-07-23 07:40:38)
bostongm , i cant sit back and read your idiotic posts anymore. you post on almost every subject and i have yet to read anything that makes sense. maybe you should actually read the article instead of skimming through it. he said if ryder cant score(and he wont) playing alongside savard or bergeron, then he cant score at all. meaning those two are great playmakers. he was actually giving them a compliment. relax harry sinden and read articles before you jump to conclusions
Mitchell (Posted 2008-07-23 00:18:45)
I think that he gets his point
bostongm (Posted 2008-07-22 23:34:42)
Its the same situation that Jagr encountered.(no i'm not saying that Ryder is Jagr) in NY. He couldnt gel with Gomez or Drury. Who did he gel with? Yup,a third liner. Dubinsky. ALL i'm suggesting is to leave all possible scenarios open. You/we never know how chemistry will work.
Yann Schneider (Posted 2008-07-22 22:40:23)
You really didnt get his point, I think. If I understand this, the point Adam is trying to make is that if Ryder cant produce with players like Savard and Bergeron then he shouldnt be getting paid anything at all. If you cant produce decently with first liners then you cant produce much. Sure Krejci is good, but are you saying that if Rydaer that produce with Bergeron and Savard he can with Krejci? Because that doesnt make much sense to be honest.
bostongm (Posted 2008-07-22 20:35:37)
Oh yeah...i forgot.....he also had 5 points in the play-offs. (1G-4A-5PTS). He was Bostons 2nd leading point getter to boot. BUT...of course you guys wouldnt notice that.
bostongm (Posted 2008-07-22 20:09:03)
IF Ryder cant score playing along-side Savard or Bergeron there's nobody else? Ahem....you forgot one David Krejci. This guy is cool under pressure. Late last season when Savard went down to injury (last 7 games),Krejci stepped up and played on the 1st line........and guess what? Yup....he delivered. He scored 3 goals and assisted on 5 goals in the 1st 4 games. The Bruins went 3-0-1 in those games. Boston is blessed with THREE excellent centers. Had Bergeron and Kobasew not been injured.......the result would have been very different indeed. BUT.....keep on "not noticing" what excellent young players the Bruins dont have. It seems like thats all you writers do.