• Print

Campbell's Cuts: Hockey has bigger problems than song controversy

Hockey Night in Canada, including Ron McLean and Don Cherry, will have a different theme for next hockey season. (Photo by Dave Sandford/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Hockey Night in Canada, including Ron McLean and Don Cherry, will have a different theme for next hockey season. (Photo by Dave Sandford/Getty Images)

I haven’t been this upset about a television show’s theme song since Gilligan’s Island changed “and all the rest” to “the Professor and Mary-Ann.”

Really, this is terrible, Hockey Night in Canada losing the rights to its own theme song. I’m sure the general populace in Canada is almost as outraged as it was a couple of years ago when Ron MacLean couldn’t come to terms on a new contract.

There will be the predictable protests and screams of outrage and passion from people who feel something sacrosanct is being irreparably damaged. If some of these people channeled their energies on something like this to something…let’s say, a little more relevant…like say, helping the homeless, I might have a little more patience for what is about to become an endless debate.

Face it everyone, it’s a song. That’s all it is. If I were a Maple Leafs fan, I’d be far more upset that - until rival CTV purchased the rights to the song - the CBC had hired Gord Kirke to mediate the dispute between the network and the song’s creator. If I were a Leafs fan, I might just think this ballyhooed “search” for a GM for the Maple Leafs is pretty much a sham. After all, if Kirke is spending his time refereeing a dispute over a song, how can he be searching for a GM for the Leafs?

If I were a hockey fan – and I am – I’d be a lot more concerned about some of the things that are going on around the game than whether or not I’ll be able to hear The Hockey Theme next season when I watch hockey on Saturday night.

For example, I’d be more worried about where the game is headed from a financial standpoint. With the salary cap going up as high as $57 million next season, there are reports at least 12 teams will lose substantial amounts of money because a $40 million salary floor is simply too high for them.

If I were going to vent my spleen over something, it would be because we missed a full season of hockey, all the while being led to believe the system was going to change. And lo and behold, three years into the new reality, it’s clear this collective bargaining agreement is accomplishing almost none of its goals.
 
There is still a huge disparity between the rich and poor teams, ticket prices have not come down one iota, players are still receiving ridiculous contracts that are the bane of those teams that sign them and small market teams are still being forced to lose players they were supposed to be able to keep.

Related Links

If I were going to be angry about something, I’d be more upset there are a number of markets in this league that are in serious, serious trouble and have owners who would love to do nothing more than sell their operations. It would make me even more hot there’s a billionaire with a passion for hockey named Jim Balsillie who could save one of those franchises – and probably raise the value of the other seven that are in deep trouble – instantly by purchasing them and moving it to a place where people deserve NHL hockey.

Rather than stew over a song, I’d be more upset Gary Bettman and the league got smacked around again in collective bargaining. I’d be really hot the league continues to insist players get only a certain percentage of revenues, which addresses the macro-economics problem the league faces, but not the micro-economic ills some teams endure.

If I were going to get lathered up about something, it would bother me to no end that the Goalie Equipment Working Group will convene its first meeting in Toronto and will continue to perpetuate the ruse that the league is actually doing something about scoring, when we all know making goaltending equipment smaller is not going to create one more scoring chance or address the real problem, which is coaches have taken control of the game and the game is worse for it.

So don’t worry about it, everybody. Within a couple of months you’ll forget about all of this and HNIC will have a snappy new tune. The real problems in the game, though, will be there long after this issue dissipates.

Ken Campbell is a senior writer for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Tuesdays and Fridays and his column, Campbell's Cuts, appears Mondays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (44)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Jason Posted
(2009-04-30 07:07:52)



All you Canadians do is cry cry cry take your hockey teams and have your own leauge,I agree there are some US cities that should not have teams but because now you have one Canadian billionaire out there that wants to buy a NHL team as his toy and Bettman wont let him you Canadians are crying...Where was the Canadian ownership when the Jets and Nordiques needed help?It bothers me that Winnipeg and Quebec are not NHL cities any more but stop crying...The leauge should only be 21 teams anyway, Florida, Phoenix, Nashville should not have teams but the same is true about Hamilton and sad to say Winnipeg and Quebec as well.
    0



Brian Dias Posted
(2009-04-30 06:26:34)



Boy, oh boy, did I ever LOVE the Ron MacLean-Gary Bettman interview during the finals this year. BETTMAN IS POLLYANNA, the naive optimist. Period. MacLean mentions the Rick Westhead Toronto Star article, and I quote, "...The six Canadian teams account for 31 per cent of the $1.1 billion (U.S.) in league ticket revenue, and have gone through league-leading double-digit increases over last season, according to the internal NHL report. Overall, the league has seen its ticket revenue rise almost 10 per cent, but 11 of the 24 U.S.-based clubs were either revenue-flat or lost ticket income.... MacLean pointed out that it was foolishness to keep rejecting Jim Balsillie's advances given the fact that Canadian teams were thriving and U.S. teams were in the crapper, but Bettman simply disputed the numbers. MacLean pointed out, in his own words, that Boots Del Biaggio was a crooked scumbag, and that Balsillie HAD to be the more stable choice to own an NHL franchise. Bettman countered that Boots is a minority owner, and that nothing untoward had been proven against him. He also expressed displeasure with Balsillie selling season's tickets and luxury boxes in Hamilton, prior to receiving Gary's blessing. Bettman looked EXTREMELY uncomfortable. It was beautiful. Bettman is right about one thing though. Balsillie DID treat the league office contemptuously, like a rubber stamp. Given Gary's fifteen year record of stupidity, can anybody blame Balsillie?
    0



Samantha Posted
(2009-04-30 06:26:25)



Like most other Canadians, I grew up with HNIC and its classic theme song. Yes, I will miss at a lot (no, it will not be the sam on CTV or TSN), but, all and all, it is just a song. It's the 6 hours that occur after then song finishes that I care about the most. As for the "sunbelt" and "non-hockey" cities, I have no problem with giving these teams a chance, but frankly, the "Wayne Gretzky" experiment in LA and the Tampa winning the cup aftermath has, shall we say, dampened my views. Sure, non-traditional hockey fans will jump up and ride the wave of a big name coming to town, or enjoy the glow of a champion team, but it quickly fades. I don't see people supporting a team with a lot of great young players in LA now, or a team with several NHL all-stars in Tampa, or another young team on the rise in the Panthers. While its nice to give them a chance, exactly how interested can people truly get about a sport where you simply can never play it in its natural setting (like a frozen outdoor rink or pond)?
    0



Mike Meehan Posted
(2009-04-30 06:26:03)



What is all of this blather about "sunbelt" teams that can't make it and the league "keeps around"? Last I remember the past two teams that hit dire financial straits and had to be "floated" by the league were in Buffalo and Ottawa. Heck, the Sens missed payroll for the players!! It's also difficult to argue that there's still a huge disparity between "rich" and "poor" teams when that difference is a locked-in, and set amount. Yeah, the CBA sucks when the economic reality starts setting in that the floor is going to be a bit on the high side for some teams, but that's more a function of the League itself having ZERO clue about marketing the league, it's teams, and it's players. The majority of advertising for the NHL and it's premiere events like the Winter Classic, All-Star Game, and Playoffs is found on the TV and Radio stations that carry HOCKEY! That's wasting your marketing dollars on preaching to the choir. In the end, the league is going to do what they can to make this all work. It's not going to happen immediately, and it may not be pretty, but it will get done. It's going to take folks like Ilitch, and MLSE to get behind the plan though. Oh, and the Red Wings Rule!
    0



Chris Oliver Posted
(2009-04-30 06:25:48)



What a shocker, Canadians are upset that they couldn't keep hockey all to themselves and actually letting other cities have a team. I am a huge Predators fan, but I didnt pay attention to hockey before we got the team. It takes time to grow a fan base and sometimees it doesnt work (Vancouver Grizzlies, Montreal Expos, Winnipeg Jets). So let the southern teams be given a chance to make it work. 10 years is a short time to grow a loyal base of fans, so maybe in another 10 we can be as crazy about hockey as you guys are. Until then you folks up north can chill and let the southerners learn to love the sport as much as you. .....And Campbell, you Nashville hating SOB, just drop it and get off our backs.
    0



Frank Szewczyk Posted
(2009-04-30 06:25:43)



I can't weigh in on the song debate however scoring should be an issue near and dear to every hockey fan. There is really on two solutions, increase the size of the ice to international standards and increase the size of the goal. The players and bigger and faster than any time in history. The technology of equipment is far advanced than any time in history. Why we insist playing the game in the cramped rinks of old is beyond my understanding.
    0



Jim Bourque Posted
(2009-04-30 06:25:40)



Come-on people, all this about a song? I think some of you have way to much time on your hands. Call hockey a game, call it entertainment, call it a tradition, it has and always will change. Money is what businees is all about. The only thing that really matters is when the puck drops, my team leaves it all on the ice, they make me proud to take my kids to the game and say, ths is our team! We're never gonna change all the rest of the BS. The players are who I count on to demonstrate: Perseverance, commitment, selflessness, hard work and responsibility. You know, all the traits I want my kids to learn and follow. You can take all of the other pro sports and throw them in the trash, mostly because of the players. Let's move on (oh, BTW, my home town is now SJ and the Sharks are my team now)
    0



George Malik Posted
(2009-04-30 06:25:27)



Gary Bettman supposedly "broke" the NHL and had Bill Daly engineered a sweetheart CBA with Ted Saskin and Trevor Linden. It's not the NHLPA's fault that Bettman was more than willing to lock the players out for an entire season to ensure an ironclad salary cap with payrolls attached to league-wide revenues. Don't blame the "greedy players" for taking what was shoved down their throats, especially after they offered up a cap locked in at the low $40's only to be told that no linkage equaled no deal. The owners did this to themselves, and if they don't like it, it's their problem.
    0



thedeke Posted
(2009-04-30 06:25:24)



I think most of Ken's points are valid (except the goalie equipment one - how are you going to stop coaches from coaching? You can't. So make the goalie equipment smaller). But I am still MUCH more worked up about the song than about any of his points. That song is a euphemism for hockey. I don't care what the CBC plays for the next fifty seasons, it won't - and can't - be as good as the old theme song. I never liked watching games on TSN compared to Sportsnet, and neither of them compare to HNIC. It is very sad that this happened.
    0



dave Posted
(2009-04-30 06:25:23)



what are you talking about campbell? "Its just a song. That's all it is." Okay there chief....and money is just paper
    0



1 2 3 4 5

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners