• Print

THN at the Stanley Cup: Final shows hockey headed in the right direction

Ryan Malone of the Penguins sets up in front of goaltender Chris Osgood and Nicklas Lidstrom of the Red Wings during Game 4. (Photo by Dave Sandford/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Ryan Malone of the Penguins sets up in front of goaltender Chris Osgood and Nicklas Lidstrom of the Red Wings during Game 4. (Photo by Dave Sandford/Getty Images)

DETROIT - This has not been the close Stanley Cup final many hoped for when two high-powered offenses like the Detroit Red Wings and Pittsburgh Penguins hooked up.

In fact, there is a good chance it’ll all be over on Monday.

But here’s the thing – the hockey has been great. The NHL appears to be inching closer and closer to what it set out to accomplish following the lockout with a greater emphasis in speed and skill.

Saturday night’s 2-1 victory for Detroit is a perfect example. Ten years ago, during the dead-puck era, a 2-1 game very likely would have been a slow death on a stick, fraught with clutching and grabbing and precious few scoring chances. But that was not the case in Game 4.

Yes, it was a close-checking game. Freeing up the game’s best players to skate unobstructed does not mean defense goes out the window. But there were plenty of scoring chances for both teams, right up until the dying seconds of the game when the Penguins came within a whisker of forcing overtime during a goal-mouth scramble.

Even though the Red Wings have been the dominant team in this series, the Penguins have had their chances. In Game 1, for example, the Red Wings put the Penguins on the power play three times since the first period. Pittsburgh could easily have gone up 1-0 or 2-0.

Same with Game 2. Although the Penguins were again shut out, Ryan Malone had a glorious opportunity to put his team up early, but had the puck bounce over his stick when he was left unguarded in the slot. Seconds later Sidney Crosby came close to scoring on a wrap-around.

The point is, what was referred to as the ‘New NHL’ has made hockey fun to watch again. And there was a time, not so long ago, when the Stanley Cup final had become a colossal bore. Third- and fourth-liners were as important to the outcome of games as the stars, sometimes more important. That is no longer the case.

I laugh when people suggest hitting is now gone from the game. Are you kidding me? Niklas Kronwall has been a hitting machine in the final. Brooks Orpik dished out five his on one shift in Game 3. Gary Roberts mows down anything that gets in his path.

It took a while for the game to get to this point and there were most certainly growing pains.

When the NHL started up again after the lockout, referees called everything. It was frustrating for the players, the coaches, the managers and the fans. But the league had a vision of where it wanted to be down the road and this was the price that had to be paid to get there.

Related Links

Gradually the league has eased off on the standard for calls. There are more battles along the boards for loose pucks as well as in front of the net.

Tomas Holmstrom doesn’t stand in front of the net with the opposing defenseman using a feather duster on him, but he also doesn’t pee blood anymore from taking shot after shot to the kidneys.

Players now understand if they use their free hand to impede an opponent, they will be penalized virtually every time. Hook an opponent and you’re gone for two.

Sidney Crosby and Alex Ovechkin are the best two players in the NHL and Henrik Zetterberg and Pavel Datsyuk are not far behind. But if the NHL had not changed the way games are called, you would not be witnessing them working the magic they have worked this season. They would have been grinded into the ice; hooked and held at every turn.

And that would have been a travesty.

Hockey had become barbaric with skill taking a backseat to thuggery. Make no mistake about it, the Anaheim Ducks won the Stanley Cup last season and their calling card was toughness. But they also had plenty of skill. Scott Niedermayer…Chris Pronger…Teemu Selanne…Corey Perry…Ryan Getzlaf…Andy MacDonald…Chris Kunitz and so on. The Ducks fought more than any other team, but it was the skill that won them the Cup.

NHL hockey is not perfect. It is becoming increasingly obvious that goaltender’s equipment has to be smaller or the nets have to be bigger – or both. But this game is moving in the right direction.

I would have loved a seven-game final this season and that isn’t likely to happen. But I’m satisfied with the direction the game is headed.

Even a little excited.

THN senior writer Mike Brophy is on the road following the Stanley Cup final and will be filing daily reports until a champion is crowned. To read his other entries, click HERE.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (46)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Jason Posted
(2009-04-30 06:23:22)



There's still no NHL team in Winnipeg though... I'd say the NHL is "heading in the right direction" soon after a struggling team relocates there. www.JetsOwner.com
    0



Jonathan Posted
(2009-04-30 06:23:20)



Bruce, I want to say that, in the old NHL, Ovechkin would get hooked, his speed would be taken away from him and his strengh would be useless. Take a guy like Derian Hatcher, he was an elite defenceman in the old NHL and now he's rather a sub par defenceman because he can,t hook or obstruct anymore. That's a huge difference. Jaromir Jagr wasn't sloppy or slacking in the latest years of the old NHL. He's one of the toughest guy around to stop when he's at full speed and got incredible hands. Why didn't he scored? Well he was just thinking, "why should I bother? when I have to drag 200 pounds on my back and no one will do anything about it?" That's why there was that much less goal scored then ever in the early 2000's. I'm not saying the new NHL is perfect, but it's much better then it used to be, at least we get to see talented guys like Pierre Marc Bouchard, Daniel Brière, Martin St-Louis explode because they are able to use their skills. The major downside is how unconsistent the referee are, if you want my opinion.
    0



Bruce Posted
(2009-04-30 06:23:15)



Someone please wake me up when the league and its media mouthpieces finally get finished congratulating themselves for all the "speed and skill" in the "NEW NHL!!"...I'm sorry but it rings as empty as phrases like "the war on terror" and "mission accomplished" and it amounts to the same thing: alot of spin intended to make us ignore other glaring failures. In the case of the NHL the glaring failure is the decision to have on-ice officials intercede to an unparalleled extent in determining the outcome of games. The adjust of players and coaches to this new "style" [and that is really the wrong word] is to introduce a bunch of theater into the game that is anything but an improvement. When the league starts handing out suspensions for dives in equal proportion to its new found love for (suspiciously untimely) obstruction calls, then players will adjust by actually playing hockey again and there will be very few of either kind of penalty that needs to be called. Several years into the wonder that is "THE NEW NHL!!!" I see a level of embellishment by players who intend to draw penalties that simply didn't exist before. If you really think that is such an improvement Brophy, I've got a sport you'll really love: European Futbol, it's 7 parts theater per 3 parts the game kids grow up playing with a ball on a field. Thanks, but I liked my hockey when I could pay more attention to the players and less to the officials. Finally, the suggestion that Crosby and Ovechkin would be "ground into the ice" is ludicrous on the face of it. They do not even remotely resemble each other. Ovechinkin is so strong on his skates that I would really like to know who you think could do all this grabbing effectively on him? Crosby goes down if you blow on him so, yes, in the "old NHL" he might still be in the minors growing into a body strong enough to play in the NHL. Outside of Pittsburgh and the media, it doesn't seem like all that many of the rest of us would regard that as such a tremendous loss, especially if it meant 5 on 5 hockey again as the rule and not the exception. If the new NHL really was such a success, would there still be all this need for apologists like Mike Brophy to keep reminding us? No.
    0



Brian Kemp Posted
(2009-04-30 06:23:15)



Cid from Indiana, here's a comment on the actual article for you: Hey Brophy, I thought games 1 and 2 were boring? Did the Pens get chances in Detroit, making those games exciting, like you say in this article, or did Detroit so thoroughly dominate that the games were almost unwatchable, like you said last week? Which is it? Is that enough for you Cid? I don't expect Mike to reply, that's why I usually don't post questions to the writers, just to other fans, who might actually have a response. I always thought the games had excitement and drama, except at the very ends of games 1 and 2, when the Wings put them out of reach. Other than that, they were close, tight games, you know, fun to watch. Even when the Wings were up by 2, the Pens do have the skill to capitalize on any mistake the Wings made. They just weren't making many.
    0



CMF Posted
(2009-04-30 06:23:15)



Hey Toots Mcgee, I agree with you completely. Zetterberg IS currently a better player than Crosby. Crosby is packed with talent, and smarts, but not quite as fast as he needs to be. But let me address my pet peeve: please don't make the nets bigger, that would be the worst choice possible. If you think goalie equipment needs to be smaller (explain why please), then go that route. If you make the nets bigger, then call it something else, like hoccer or sockey, or some damn thing. Or, wait.... we could just leave it the way it is, right?
    0



Brian Posted
(2009-04-30 06:23:13)



Excellent posts Jeremy and Kristopher. Crosby will be great but right now he doesn't compare to Hank or Datsyuk. Any player that is limited in the roles that they can play (ie. penalty kill) should not be considered a "great one". He does have the potential but right now is just too young. His immaturity never shined more than when he tried to chase Zetterburg of the ice on Saturday and then spent the remainder of the evening trying to minimize Hanks effort on the 5 on 3. I imagine we will see the Penguins in the playoffs again next year but for Pittsburghs sake, hopefully Sid the Kid can outgrow his nickname.
    0



Derwood Sleezy Posted
(2009-04-30 06:23:13)



Let the Pens fans have "the best" player, and gloat and drool over him all they want.....I'll take the Cup!!!! Wooooooooooot!!!!!!!!!!!!
    0



Samantha Posted
(2009-04-30 06:23:13)



I certainly wouldn't put Crosby among the top 2 players in the league. Yes, he has talent. Yes, he's competitive (a little too competitive - its turning into a negative for him). Yes, he has a lot of offensive imagination and the skill to use it in a game. But, he's still very young and still has some work to do in his own end before we can crown him the best in the NHL. He's close, but not quite there yet. As for the goalie pads and net, we don't need to change either. All you need to do is continue the course of the strong calls against hooking and holding, and eventually, once the young kids out there spend a few more years developing in leagues where they can use their Ovechkin and Crosby moves in games, you will see scoring increase. But, it will still take a few more years for these kids to grow and develop before we see it at the NHL level. If this draft (and THNs draft preview issue are accurate) we're finally starting to see NHL scouts and GMs move away from the holy grail of size-toughness-brawn and more into skill-skating-hockey sense. This will only encourage the smaller, skilled kids out there to stick with it and continue playing hockey. The fruits of the obstruction crackdown are coming folks, just wait and see!
    0



Casey Posted
(2009-04-30 06:23:13)



The "top xxx players in the league" debate is laughable. If you told the players when they were drafted that they would never win scoring titles or Art Ross Trophies or Rocket Richard Trophies but they would have the chance to play in the finals multiple times in their careers, I'd bet almost to a man they would take it. (There's always a few glory hounds out there) Yzerman is the perfect example. He was scoring 60+ goals and was regarded as one of the best offensive players in the league. BUT THEIR SEASONS WERE ALMOST ALWAYS OVER IN MARCH! Along comes Bowman, who helps him become a great 2 way player, and he finishes with 3 Cups! As a fan would you rather have THE BEST player on your team who scores 120 points/year and never wins it all, or would you rather have a TEAM that works towards a common goal and hoists the big silver cup at the end of the year? Of course we'd like to have both of those, but it hasn't worked that way since the 80's and 90's. It's the old cliche, defense wins championships. But now you need defense from more than just the defensemen. Just a thought...
    0



Rob M Posted
(2009-04-30 06:23:13)



All of you who are trying to build Crosby up as a great goal scorer/points are a little misguided. Crosby scored 120pts against Eastern teams. The majority of his games are easy. Take a look at the same season in the West. Joe Thornton 112pts, Jarome Ignina 95pts, Teemu Selanne 94pts. Not as many points against more difficult teams. The West has the big four Detroit, Dallas, Anaheim and San Jose. But Colorado, Calgary and Nashville are no slouches either. On any day they can take you to the limit. Besides Montreal and Pittsburgh who in East even has a chance at matching the power teams from the West? Crosby a 19 year old scored 120pts in the East against easier teams; counter point Teemu Selanne a 38 year old scored 94pts against difficult appointments, whose accomplisment was bigger?
    0



1 2 3 4 5

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Who should start in goal for Russia at the Olympics?






THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I was coming in to take the boards away and had some good jump. He bobbled the puck at the last second and I don’t think he saw me coming at all. It was a shoulder right in his chest. He’s eight feet tall, so it’s not like you could hit him in the head.”

- Ottawa's Chris Neil about a hit he threw on Tampa's Victor Hedman Thursday night, causing Hedman to leave the game.

Our Partners