• Print

THN at the Stanley Cup: Wakey wakey Evgeni!

Dan Cleary of the Red Wings defends against Evgeni Malkin of the Penguins. (Photo by Dave Reginek/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Dan Cleary of the Red Wings defends against Evgeni Malkin of the Penguins. (Photo by Dave Reginek/NHLI via Getty Images)

DETROIT - If the Pittsburgh Penguins are going to win the Stanley Cup, then somebody had better put in a wakeup call to Evgeni Malkin.

The Hart Trophy finalist has been in a funk since midway through the third round against Philadelphia and unless he gets it in gear, the Penguins are going to be hard-pressed to defeat the Red Wings.

The Flyers used physical contact to slow the big Russian down in the Eastern Conference final, but Saturday the Red Wings left him alone. No sense in waking a sleeping giant.

Malkin spent most of the game up against Detroit’s second defensive pairing of Brad Stuart and Niklas Kronwall and often was up against forwards Kris Draper and Valtteri Filppula. It’s not as though those players had to work hard to contain him, either. On a scale of one to 10, Malkin’s effort registered about a four.

Not to suggest Saturday night’s loss in the series opener was entirely his fault, but he was barely noticeable in the game until he took a lazy tripping penalty late in the second period and then mishandled the puck early in the third, a play that led to Detroit’s Mikael Samuelsson scoring his second goal of the night.

Pittsburgh’s other marquee player, Sidney Crosby, fared a little better. He was able to control play for periods of time, particularly when his team had the man advantage, but at the end of the night, he too probably wishes he could take a mulligan.

Crosby’s best scoring chance came midway through the third period when he couldn’t corral a rebound off the backboards despite staring at an empty net.

Although both teams possess a lot of offensive power, the opener was not the fire-wagon hockey many expected. No matter how many goals they score, the Red Wings will always be a defense-first team and that was evident in the way they limited Pittsburgh’s scoring chances, especially in the second period when they outshot the Penguins 16-4.

* Hardest hit of the night goes to Detroit defenseman Niklas Kronwall, who flattened Pittsburgh winger Ryan Malone, catching him with his head down as he tried to carry the puck out of his team’s zone.

 * Tomas Holmstrom is a marked man. For the second time the Red Wings had a goal disallowed because Holmstrom was ruled to have interfered with the goalie. On this occasion Holmstrom’s stick wound up between the legs of Marc-Andre Fleury, who was unable to stop Nicklas Lidstrom’s close-range shot. The goal was waved off and Holmstrom was penalized for goaltender interference. For the record, I thought it was a good call. Many sitting by me in the press box did not.

Related Links

 * It was a bad night for the Pittsburgh power play. The Penguins were 0-for-5 and allowed a third period shorthanded goal by Dan Cleary.

* The Penguins outshot Detroit 12-11 in the first period, but then managed just four shots in the second period and only three in the third. Once the Red Wings got the lead, they dug in and played the puck-control game they are known for.

* You think players are superstitious? While the Red Wings like to alternate players leading the stretch on the ice at game day skates, they went with Darren McCarty the morning of Game 1 because he led the stretch prior to the start of Game 6 of the Dallas series – a Detroit victory.

You may recall McCarty also has a superstition; he likes to be the last player to leave the ice after warm-up. About 10 years ago at a game in Calgary, he came up against the Flames’ Sandy McCarthy, who also likes to be the last player to leave. The two stubbornly stood on the ice until they finally decided to do rock, paper, scissors to see who would leave first. McCarthy won, so McCarty left. “He beat me fare and square, so I left,” McCarty said.

 * If you live in the Detroit area and spent Saturday night home alone, you might want to consider getting life. Not only did the Red Wings play in Game 1 of the final, the Pistons and Boston Celtics were playing in town, the Tigers had a home game and an outdoor techno-pop concert was being held.

* Every year NHL commissioner Gary Bettman meets with the media prior to the start of Game 1 of the Stanley Cup final to talk about how wonderful things are, even when they aren’t.

This year, however, things actually are pretty good. Starting with the fact two teams boasting boatloads of skill are in the final, plus NHL attendance exceeded 21 million for the first time (an average of 17,000 per game, also a first). So there really isn’t a whole lot to complain about.

THE HOCKEY NEWS GAME 1 THREE STARS
1. Mikael Samuelsson, Detroit
2. Chris Osgood, Detroit
3. Jordan Staal, Pittsburgh

THN senior writer Mike Brophy is on the road following the Stanley Cup final and will be filing daily reports until a champion is crowned. To read his other entries, click HERE.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (20)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Randy L Stanton Posted
(2009-04-30 06:21:33)



Ghwomb... Were you even watching the game?!?!!? MAF was OUTSIDE the crease and skated into Homer's stick. The 1st period was such an obvious attempt by the NHL to jump start the Pens in the Finals by keeping the Wing's shorthanded and actually giving Homer a penalty on O'Halloran's hallucination. Sorry Gary, it didn't work. Perhaps when you're giving Sid the Skid his regular post game hot oil "rub-down" you can apologize for not disallowing all 5 goals and hope he forgives you. Giving Staal the 3rd star was just as embarrassing as the officiating. Staal was a -1 with 0 shots, how about giving it to Cleary with a +1 and a shorty?
    0



Eli Posted
(2009-04-30 06:21:32)



Hey Mike, The issue isn't whether the Holmstrom incident was a "good call" or a "bad call". To write about it that way over-simplifies the issue and really dumbs things down unnecessarily. No, the real issue here is this -- why wasn't that "good call" made all year? I mean, it's one thing to approach the situation by flatly saying "I thought it was a good call". How about calling it like it is? "I thought it was a good call, but considering the fact that this particular "good call" wasn't made ALL YEAR LONG, it's becoming plainly clear that Tomas Holmstrom is a marked man with the league and its officials." Mike, I'm not questioning your hockey knowledge. However, even at the NHL level, you can't reasonably ask men to play the game one way for seven months and then a totally different way for three weeks. It's ridiculous, and every fan of the game (even those located in Pittsburgh, whether they will admit it or not) knows it. If it's such a good call, then make the call all year long. Then players like Holmstrom can adapt to it and we can all get on with things. But to start this type of ticky-tack "discretionary" BS this late is pretty crazy if you ask me. And all it's going to do is discredit the NHL even more in the eyes of everyone ...
    0



Peter Posted
(2009-04-30 06:21:32)



Yeah, Malkin really needs to wake up so that Crosby can get all the credit...
    0



Ghwomb Posted
(2009-04-30 06:21:30)



From http://www.nhl.com/rules/rule78.html via http://thepensblog.blogspot.com : "If an attacking player initiates any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed." So it seems like it was the right call, since Holmström had his stick between Fleurys skates. Good to know the refree handling the Stanley Cup finals know the rulebook better then the average viewer, me included.
    0



Etienne Posted
(2009-04-30 06:21:30)



It was a goal, anyone saying otherwise is either blind or a moron. We've ALL seen much worse goalie interference during the regular season and the playoffs with goals ending up allowed. Those 2 refs last night were whistle happy, and that's it. I'm just glad it didn't affect the outcome of the game.
    0



Bill Brown Posted
(2009-04-30 06:21:28)



The cowardly NHL continues to run and hide. They managed to NOT include the disallowed goal in their video highlights, even though that could have been one of the key plays of the game, and was certainly a bigger play than most of the saves they chose to include in their highlights package. Further the NHL's paid spokesmen at Versus actively work to cover up the blatant mistakes with Keith Jones saying during the on the air replay, "Holmstrum's stick is clearly in Theury's waist. That's a good call." So now you have to make things up to cover up the NHL's vendetta against Holmstrum? His stick was on the ice surface!! If that was in Theury's waist there was no way he was stopping the shot anyhow. How come no one is calling out the absolutely moronic Versus employees?
    0



Bill Brown Posted
(2009-04-30 06:21:28)



BTW, pardon my ignorance Mike, are you a son or any relation to John Brophy? He's kind of a legend here in Virginia, among other places!
    0



Joe Willix Posted
(2009-04-30 06:21:28)



Bill, I think you're absolutely right about the yes-men in the intermission shows (shame on you Keith and Brian), but I give a LOT of credit to Eddie Olcyk. Both times Holmstrom had his goals called off Eddie's first reaction was of disbelief and said they shouldn't have been called off. I guess Gary's going to have to sit him down for a chat so Eddie can get on the same page as everyone else. And I did hear a rumour that along with the smaller goalie equipment, the NHL is going to increase the size of the crease...out to the blue line. Holmstrom, enter the zone at your own risk.
    0



Bill Brown Posted
(2009-04-30 06:21:28)



You're right Joe, I kind of threw a broad paint brush at the Versus crew, there were several who are clearly disappointed and frustrated with the NHL's failure to clarify the rules and be consistent with the goalie-interference situation.
    0



Jeff Posted
(2009-04-30 06:21:27)



So is anyone else as pissed and disgusted as I am about that no goal. I mean seriously they are lucky the wings won by 4. To be honest I almost think thats what motivated the wings to a whole new level. babcock was outraged and I think at intrermission he went in there and told the boys that its us against the world, its us against the nhl, its us against the refs, its us against the penguins. And you know what they came out and dominated. I bet you Sidney had a rough nights sleep ladt night. He cant believe what they'd been missing for the past 1 1/2 years. They havent played a team like detroit in well, pretty much ever. The detroit team they played 1 1/2 years ago was 1/2 the team we are now. I honestly dont see Pit winning 1 game. Maybe, just maybe they steal game 3 or 4 but I dont see this going more than 5 after that schalacking.
    0




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners