• Print

THN.com Playoff Blog: Stars use all their ammo to beat Wings

The Dallas Stars' Game 4 win forces the series to head back to Detroit. (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

The Dallas Stars' Game 4 win forces the series to head back to Detroit. (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

So that's what it takes to beat the Red Wings in these playoffs: Dallas' best effort, certainly of the series and perhaps of the post-season. (And that's saying something when you take a moment to recall how efficiently Dallas dispatched the defending Stanley Cup-champion Ducks in the first round.)

The Stars threw everything they had at the Wings, from the opening minute of the first period through to captain Brenden Morrow's clinching goal with about five minutes remaining in the third. It was an impressive outing for Dallas – in all likelihood it merely delays the inevitable elimination, but hey, give Big D some credit – and perhaps most telling was the Stars' ability to recover from Henrik Zetterberg's game-tying goal in the first minute of the third after Loui Eriksson had given the home side a 1-0 lead in the final minute of the second.

Eriksson, who nearly scored late in the second on a wraparound, jumped over the boards for one more shift at the end of the middle frame and shoveled in a Tomas Holmstrom-esque, blue-ice special when he gave the Stars their first lead of the series at 19:37.

While Eriksson's goal wasn't pretty (did we mention it was Tomas Holmstrom-esque? More on him later…) the Stars' second and third markers were identical beauties that even incorporated some time-space continuum stuff. And let's face it, sci-fi doesn't happen nearly enough in the game of hockey. Former captain Mike Modano, the longtime face of the franchise, scored an old-school Stars power play goal when he took a tic-tac-toe pass (Sergei Zubov on the left half-boards provided the tac, Brad Richards on the point started it off with the tic) and one-timed a slapshot from the slot past Chris Osgood.

How many times have we seen Zubov-to-Modano-and-in? How many times has old Mike, old Mr. America, blasted home a third period game-winner for Dallas? Let's leave it at "lots" and just enjoy the moment.

OK, about that time-space continuum stuff. As Dallas clung to its 2-1 lead in the middle stages of the third, you know coach Dave Tippett's heart was thumping like Tomas Holmstrom in a goal crease (not yet; we'll get to the Nemesis Of All Netminders later). But Tippett has a player like few others, and he happens to be the Stars' current captain.

And Brenden Morrow, in a poetic nod to Modano, happened to score the 3-1 goal from the exact same spot and in nearly the exact same manner as Mikey Franchise's game-winner, hammering a slapper from the slot past Osgood at 14:34. Zubov didn't make the pass to Morrow, but he did make the pass to the player (Mike Ribeiro) who made the pass. Finally, Morrow even celebrated with the same joyous fist-pump that Modano threw out after his moment of glory. So, old team leader chips in, new team leader closes out the deal, and Dallas lives to fist-pump another day.

Related Links


Holmstrom. Right. You all know his game. He stands in front of opposing goalies, agitating and screening like a Swedish Dino Ciccarelli for the 21st century.

Holmstrom does it well, probably better than anyone in the league, and we always seem to be talking about him in the playoffs; at least, a lot more than we talk about most of the league's other 20-goal scorers. He's a playoff guy. But, his on-the-edge (of-the-crease) reputation may have hurt the Wings in Game 4.

With Detroit on a power play in the second period, Holmstrom fell/bulled into Marty Turco and Detroit nearly scored. Looked like goalie interference, but no goal, so all is forgotten. Except…a few seconds later, with Holmstrom clearly on the white ice inches outside the crease's blue paint (inches!, we say) and not interfering with Turco (screening, yes; interfering, no), the Wings scored what should have been the first goal of the game.

Except…the referee immediately waved it off. Huh? Even more confusing, there's no penalty on Holmstrom for goalie interference (which he wasn't, but if you're waving off the goal for that reason…seems like grounds for a penalty).

Long story short. Should've been a goal. Would've been 1-0 Detroit. Could've been a completely different outcome to Game 4. The Wings won't waste much time on the shoulda, coulda, woulda, but you know GM Ken Holland is mailing NHL head ref Stephen Walkom the videotape on that one. Because, irony of ironies, Holmstrom was the innocent victim. This time, anyway.

Stop of the game? How about Marty Turco's right pad on Kirk Maltby's one-timer from the slot with Dallas clinging to a 2-1 lead in the third? It was a good one, but there were plenty to choose from: Detroit outshot Dallas 29-13 over the final 40 minutes.

And finally…the Wings had a 6-on-3 in the final minute of the third period. It was only for 19 seconds, but try telling that to Turco.

THN.com's Playoff Blogs, featuring analysis and opinion on the night's action with insight on what happened and what it all means going forward, will appear daily throughout the NHL playoffs. Read more entries HERE.

Sam McCaig is The Hockey News' senior copy editor and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Tuesdays and his column, From The Point, every second Friday.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (16)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Lane Meyer Posted
(2009-04-30 06:19:15)



Mr. Reinecke, Babcock said specifically that Sutherland was a "good ref " that missed a call. "We're moving on", he also stated in the same press conf. This is the way a good team handles a bad call/adversity. Let's Go Red Wings!
    0



Kristopher Posted
(2009-04-30 06:19:04)



Chuck, don't mind Mr. Reinke there. He's too much of a Stars homer to care about little things like actual integrity, rules, or actual talent if it gets in the way of the Stars getting to the Finals. He's pretty much proven as much through his extensive whining in the Adam Proteau column earlier in the week. And people say us WINGS fans are bad...
    0



Daniel Shubeck Posted
(2009-04-30 06:19:01)



I can’t wait for the day when the new NHL comes out and fines or suspends a ref for making a stupid call. When players act foolishly fines are quickly imposed. I’ve been a fan for many moons and I can’t say I ever saw 2 calls blown that were so obvious. Of course the game 1 call when TH was in the crease should have been called no goal. And last night….. I can’t write what I really think of Sutherland. The refs are not consistent night in and night out. They call stupid penalties at center ice that have no impact on the play, then when play is in either teams end they let hooking and interference go. I like to watch good hockey, w/o the girls in stripes dictating the outcome of the game. Get it right or get out. Gary B should grow some stones and fine or suspend these guys publicly when they get it wrong.
    0



joe mel Posted
(2009-04-30 06:19:01)



i was lucky enough to see both players in their prime both were two best fowards offensively that i ever saw, gretzky was phenomenal because he only weighed a buck sixty and no one could touch him or catch him with a good body check, he was the best horizontal vertical player to skate in that fashion, he would skate sideways againest the grain of the ice, it couldnt be defended, he was a better passer then lemieux. lemieux was a tall fluid skater who was great around the net or away from it, had he been healthier his career numbers would have been as good or better then gretzky, but alas gretzky was just a tad bit better. very few other players in their class. jean beliveau was gretzky lemieux like player, sid the kid may turn out one day to be like them but not yet. there are many great players, yes greztky had coffey, messier underated and best rt wing ever kurri and cast of others but lemiuex also had mark recchi and kevin stevens in their prime. since the great two have left, only stevie yzerman compared and he falls just a little short of the mark. mike bossy hands down is the greatest goal scorer to play the game, sorry folks, he averaged 50-60 goals for 10 straight seasons and no body and i mean nobody after watching hockey from 1965 until 2008 had a release or shot like that man. he was uncanny, trottier and potvin do not get the credit they deserve for 5 straight cup appearences. the edmonton oliers and pittsburg penquins could have even been greater dynasties. the montreal canadians with the great big three on defense robinson, savard, lapointe, dryden in goal, gainey shutt, lemaire, the big m brothers, carboneau, risebough, yvan cournoyer they were the best team i saw in over 40 years. they were awesome of coures edmonton and nyi were just as great, a debate for the ages, the most fun team to watch was of course the phil flyers and the big bad bruins, no better grudge match up except when those two teams or the nyi got together, goon heaven, schultz, saleski, kelly, dupont, bridgeman, the big o, dornhofer, bruins john wensink, wayne cashman, stan johnathan, pie mckenzie, derek sanderson, the isles clark gillies, bob nystrom, gary howatt, ah thos were the days, no masks on goalies no helmets on players nuff said
    0



Jim Reinecke Posted
(2009-04-30 06:18:59)



I knew this was coming! The Wings get a goal disallowed because "Cancer of the Crease" has himself planted in front of the opposing goalie (what a surprise!) and now the entire wrath of the Motor City is being called down on Kelly Sutherland. Sutherland was just taking the attitude of Claude Rains in "Casablanca": "Round up the usual suspects." (Tell me that number 96 isn't a usual suspect for that particular crime). Yet here go the Wing fans sounding like Rains in the same film with his "I'm shocked! Shocked to find that gambling is going on!" as you're all "Shocked! Shocked that Holmstrom was in the crease". Gimme a break! Thanks, Kelly Sutherland, for showing some integrity. . .what are you trying to do, anyway? Become an official in the NFL where they show consistency and call a penalty in the first minute of the first exhibition game or in overtime in the Super Bowl? Let's once and for all drop this nonsense that a penalty isn't a penalty or an infraction that nullifies a goal isn't an infraction that nullifies a goal simply because it's the playoffs. And to Stephane Robidas and Steve Ott. . .props to you for making that malignant fungus aware that he wasn't going to get away with hanging all over Turco at the end of the game. Keep it up Saturday afternoon!
    0



Chuck Posted
(2009-04-30 06:18:59)



Reinecke, Are you seriously going to consider what happened in the 2nd period as a display of "integrity?" Call it fate, call it Schadenfreude - do NOT call it integrity. As I recall, it was Sutherland that blew the interference call in a Pens/Rangers game in the 2nd round? Yeah - integrity. Funny. To the comments about Robidas and especially Ott - Ott sitting crosschecking and sitting Holmstrom for no less than 10seconds - that's hockey? That's the new NHL?? Integrity? get real.
    0



Maxime Posted
(2009-04-30 06:18:58)



To Nathen : The writer reports what he saw in game 4. Not what should have been because of what happen in game 1, or any other game for that matter. To the Lemieux vs Gretzky crew : Impossible to compare : 2 different styles, 2 differents roles. One was a great goal scorer who could set up some nice plays, and the other was King of playmakers, who could score some nice goals. Exactly the same thing we got with the Crosby vs Ovechkin duel. In both cases, i pick the playmaker who can score, not the scorer who can start plays. To everyone : Refs are human. Humans make mistakes. Deal with it. Besides, if refs were perfect, what would we, avid hockey fans, complain about? Refs are there to stay and make mistakes, and it's not like it's about to change tomorrow. Besides, i would so love to see any of you who criticized any calls play the referee for just 5 minutes in the game. We will see how many calls you miss.
    0



Chris Velie Posted
(2009-04-30 06:18:57)



I've read several comments referencing the dis-allowed goal by TH. Obviously that was a terrible call and did effect the outcome of the game. As a Stars fan I want the Stars to win but hate to see a call like that on either side. Some have mentioned a bias that would allow the Stars to win. Surely anyone who has watched every minute of this series recognizes that there is a bias and it ain't in favor of the Stars. Game one was, in my opinion, called to the Wings advantage and was particularly annoying. Don't get me wrong: the Wings are the better team. But the better team does not always win and a evenly called contest is certainly the only shot Dallas has. Again, I'm not blaming the refs for 3-1 hole, but they sure are not making it any easier.
    0



Tess Posted
(2009-04-30 06:18:57)



JR, I just want to know why you decided to post that comment on this article, which has nothing to do with either Gretzky or Lemieux. It would be better placed on an article entitled something like "Who's Better: The Great One or Le Magnifique?" Save your lengthy tirades for a relevent forum.
    0



Chris Posted
(2009-04-30 06:18:57)



Homer got screwed on that call, but Detroit should close it out at home in the next game so I don't think they're too worried
    0




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners