• Print

Analysis: Maurice firing came three months too late

Paul Maurice had a 76-66-22 record over two seasons with the Leafs. (Photo by Bill Wippert/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Paul Maurice had a 76-66-22 record over two seasons with the Leafs. (Photo by Bill Wippert/NHLI via Getty Images)

From the moment John Ferguson was fired in late January as GM of the Toronto Maple Leafs, head coach Paul Maurice was a dead man walking.

So why did it take nearly four months for the coroner to show up and declare him a goner?

According to Leafs interim GM Cliff Fletcher, it was all about timing – specifically, the chance to give Maurice and now-former Toronto assistant coach Randy Ladouceur the chance to find another job as early as possible.

But that’s not the timing Fletcher should’ve been concerned with.

For the record, the affable Maurice was officially shown the door Wednesday morning. However, the noose had been fashioned for him long before then.

He’d only held the job for a year-and-a-half when Ferguson was dismissed, but it was clear to many NHL observers that whomever replaced Fletcher would want his own candidate behind Toronto’s bench, thus leaving Maurice on borrowed time.

“I think it was obvious that new management would want new coaching,” Fletcher said at a news conference announcing Maurice’s dismissal.

My question is, if it was obvious today new management would want new coaching, why wasn’t it obvious the moment Fletcher took over from Ferguson?

What the Leafs should’ve done then was cleared out both the GM and coaching positions at the same time and installed an interim coach alongside Fletcher whose strings management could easily pull with an eye toward improving the franchise long-term.

Instead, by leaving Maurice in charge for the remainder of the season, they created a situation where he was coaching to hang onto his job – hence his insane insistence of playing goalie Vesa Toskala for 30 straight games before Toronto was eliminated from playoff contention – rather than doing the smart thing and positioning the team for a better draft slot.

Related Links

Now, rather than drafting in the top five of a deep draft, the Leafs will choose seventh overall, and Maurice is gone anyway. It’s small moves like this that add up to the reason why Toronto has been pining for a Stanley Cup championship for the last 41 years.

But that hasn’t stopped the rumor mill for churning out scenarios that grow more fantastic by the minute. The latest gossip at the press conference had Leafs ownership asking permission to speak with former Vancouver GM Dave Nonis for the position.

Nonis carries none of the qualifications (i.e. being a proven winner in the position) the Leafs have said they’re looking for, but the whispers were that Nonis would hold onto the position for a single year and then hand over the reins to Ducks GM Brian Burke after his contract expires at the end of next season.

So, if you’re following, Nonis plays babysitter for his good friend and mentor Burke, then nobly steps aside so the real architect could step in and get his plan up and running. Any more twists and turns in this tale and Maple Leafs Sports and Entertainment will be dropping down breadcrumbs to counter the convolution.

It also sounds a whole lot to me like the Leafs would be “spinning their wheels in sand,” contrary to Fletcher’s insistence Wednesday, under such a plan.

Enough of that talk for now. Today’s story is about Maurice. Don’t shed a tear for him, as he’ll land on his feet with relative ease either with another NHL team or as a TV analyst.

Save those tears for a Leafs franchise and fan base that has a lot of rebuilding – and probably another coaching change or two – in the cards before they ever get close to hockey’s holiest of grails.

COMMENTS (35)

Sort: Oldest | Newest | Love | Hate    Filter: All | Videos


Bruce Posted
(2009-04-30 06:17:22)



"As the Leafs Turn" is not a soap opera that I spend my time watching, but since it is the NHL media's (ahem, Toronto's NHL media's...) favorite topic, here we go again. First of all, suggesting that Maurice should have tanked to get a better draft pick is really beyond responding to. Not only is it reprehensible on its face, but its absurd. Nobody gets better by losing. One draft pick is not going to turn a franchise around whose problems are so entrenched that the ownership and the media has no idea what to do other than to fire people on a biannual basis. A few months ago it was all about why core players like Tucker and Sundin wouldn't break their no trade clauses, today it is why the Leafs didn't clean house (again) more thoroughly and earlier. Breaking things is easy, it comes from a lack of patience. Building things is much harder because it takes not only patience, but a plan. As long as the ownership, media and fans surrounding the Leafs organization keeps smashing their toys like frustrated children, they're going to keep getting the same results no matter how many players. coaches, and GMs they trade, waive, fire or hire.
    0



Bernard Davidoff Posted
(2009-04-30 06:17:19)



You do not play to lose at any level. Do you tell your team to throw the game in order to achieve a higher pick? Do players now forgo all their training and not compete? Do you tell the ticket buying public that the games don't count because we no longer want to win. Do you fire Maurice and bring in a new coach and tell him to lose? What utter nonsense.
    0



Peter Riley Posted
(2009-04-30 06:17:19)



1) It is NOT utter nonsense. If that was the case then any team unloading players at the deadline would be accused of bad sportamanship, however that action is very much a fabric of how the NHL operates, AND makes trade deadline day one of the most compelling times of the season. A logical extension is to play Raycroft and see if he can put a decent string together to increase his marketability, play the kids more to give them valuable experience, bring pogge up for a few starts, etc. 2) How is Maurice, playing to save his job considered good sportsmanship. If he tanked games he would be fired, if he tried really hard and just missed the playoffs, he would be fired, if he made the playoffs, he might be able to keep his job. His behavior was not about sportsmanship, it was about self preservation.
    0



Riley Posted
(2009-04-30 06:17:19)



Why is Maurice getting a free ride? When Quinn was coach there were numerous knocks on him, overly loyal to veterans, not a tactician, not alot of systems in place. When I heard Maurice was hired, while sad to see Quinn go, I expected the new look leafs to improve in their preparedness for games. I thought they were short on talent, but I fully expected them to not be outworked by their opponents, to play sound defensively and to play within systems of this new coach. One can knock JFJ for the talent level on this team, but in the past two years I have been astounded by the inconsistency, lack of work ethic and poor team defense (Brian McCabe aside) that the leafs have displayed. Maurice sure seems classy, presents well in the media, but while some say he didnt have the horses, I think he could have alot more with what he had. Futhermore, his loyalty to his veterans seems to be on par with Quinns, except that Quinn got his veterans to play well enough to get to the playoffs.
    0



Doug Posted
(2009-04-30 06:17:18)



Proteau, you should be the All World G.M., with you superior insights. I am not now, nor ever been a Leafs fan but I wish to acknowledge , that despite the turmoil Maurice had to endure he still had a winning record. Let's face facts, Cliff fletcher is Yesterdays man and it is sad that Today's coach was let go for this. Leaf hierarchy, Get Real and find another Maurice and a G.M. with the same ideals and you shall suceed. If Not, be prepared for Cliff Fletcher's insight, which by the way, has accomplished nothing in the last two decades
    0



Rob Carter Posted
(2009-04-30 06:17:17)



Brian - nice attitude. Last I checked, it's not the coach's job to trade players.
    0



Rob Carter Posted
(2009-04-30 06:17:16)



"...rather than doing the smart thing and positioning the team for a better draft slot." That would have been a shameful thing to do. Teams are supposed to try to win games. When you play in a game, you try to win it. When you coach a game, you try to win it. I know hockey is a business, but it's also a sport. Good for Maurice for showing that sportsmanship isn't dead.
    0



Brian Harvey Posted
(2009-04-30 06:17:16)



Rob Carter.... you're an idiot!! Good sportsmanship?? That's why the Leafs haven't won the Stanley Cup in 41 years. This team isn't good enough to win a playoff series, never mind win the Stanley Cup. It needs to go to the bottom, rebuild with youth and start over. Tampa Bay realized it wasn't going anywhere and traded Richards, now they have the first pick. Unfortunately the Leafs don't have the intelligence to mastermind such a plan. This team is a bunch of third and fourth line players and is devoid of any top line talent. Regrettably Leaf management is only interested in soaking every last nickel out of Leaf fans instead of providing them with a top-level team.
    0



Peter Richard Posted
(2009-04-30 06:17:15)



The Toronto Maple Leafs are a joke. Have been for almost half a century and will continue to be for another 50 years. They're not even a hockey team, they're a circus with no interest in anything but making money so who cares if they fire another coach? Just put another monkey in a suit and put him behind the bench to oversee the clowns skating around. The most embarrasing thing for this sorry excuse for an NHL franchise? Seeing all those empty platinum section seats on TV at the beginning of the 2nd and 3rd periods. The Leafs are so... insignificant.
    0



bob moris Posted
(2009-04-30 06:17:15)



In many cases, firing the coach is the most easy and most stupid way to solve a clubs problems. In Paul Maurice's case it is the stupid way. As a former hockeycoach I do not understand how an organisation like the Maple Leafs can be so amateur. It looks like people with no hockey knowledge at all are taking the decisions and on top of it the media fill their pages with a lot of nonsens. Remember that all coaches all over the world depend on the capacity of their players. Remember also that no one, and especially the media, knows what is going on in a team. Sometimes it looks like the best coaches in the world only work in the media !!??! Although I do not know Paul Maurice I am convinced he is a good coach and I hope another intelligent organisation hires him. I'll say more: it is not because you win a lot of games that you are a good coach. And of course a lot of people are laughing now but real coaches do understand what I am saying...
    0



1 2 3 4

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Who wins the Smyth-Quincey/Preissing trade?




THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

"I'm not here to replace him."

- Martin Havlat, who signed with Minnesota a few hours after former Wild star Marian Gaborik inked a UFA deal with the Rangers.

Our Partners