Dan Ellis finished the playoffs with a 2.52 GAA and .938 SP. (Photo by John Russell/NHLI via Getty Images)
Ken Campbell
2008-04-21 11:55:31
The Nashville Predators have played a total of 12 home playoff games in the past four post-seasons and 11 of them have been legitimate sellouts. Come playoff time the fans in Nashville have been just as rabid and raucous as any others in the league and once the calendar hits mid-April, Music City gets a serious case of playoff fever.
It has been the same thing for the past four years, sadly, with the same result: A first round ouster.
Which is exactly why there’s little reason to believe this year’s playoff run will have any more of a long-term impact on this franchise than any other. Come next October, you’ll probably see the same sparse crowds, the same general ambivalence toward the on-ice product and the same stunning lack of enthusiasm from the corporate community.
Which is sad, really, because aside from the fact they haven’t been able to shake off their tag as first-round losers, the Predators have done almost everything right from a hockey operations standpoint.
Under GM David Poile, the Predators’ record for drafting and developing talent has been among the best in the league, for the most part their free agent signings and trades have been prudent and their front-office stability has been the envy of every other coach and GM.
And now it’s time for the new owners of the Predators to step up and prove they truly want NHL hockey to work in Nashville. They owe it to the diehards who support the team, they owe it to the fellow owners who supply the teat upon which the Predators rely for revenue sharing and they owe it to a league that shut its doors for a year, primarily to help teams such as the Preds survive.
So far, the Predators have gotten everything they’ve wanted. They got the CBA they so desperately needed and the City of Nashville is taking potential tax dollars out of things such as schools and social programs in an effort to keep the Predators from leaving town.
And like another CBA poster child – the Buffalo Sabres – the Predators have rewarded their fans by essentially stiffing them. Former owner Craig Leipold sold the team before getting a sweetheart deal to own the far more lucrative Minnesota Wild, but before doing that, forced Poile to strip the organization of some of its top veteran players in a desperate cost-cutting move.
This is where it must end. And it must end with the Predators doing everything they possibly can to sign goaltender Dan Ellis to a long-term contract extension. If they do, it will require a complete about face by team management, which, before the playoffs, seemed intent on allowing Ellis to depart as an unrestricted free agent and next season go with the tandem of Chris Mason and prospect Pekka Rinne.
But the way Ellis, who turns 28 in June, played down the stretch and in the playoffs should change everything. He recorded the best save percentage in the league during the regular season and was spectacular in defeat for the Predators, even though he was victimized by a one-bouncer that got past him in Game 6.
Ellis will command a long-term contract worth at least $3 million a season, one would think, and it will require the Predators to swallow hard before making that offer. This is a team, after all, which rewarded Chris Mason with a $3 million deal for his play last season, which was so good that when the Predators were forced to strip-mine their organization last summer, they traded Tomas Vokoun to the Florida Panthers.
Mason didn’t exactly prove to be the No. 1 goalie the Predators were seeking and signing Ellis to a similar, if not more lucrative, deal would require a leap of faith by Poile & Co. Not to mention the fact if Nashville was to pay Ellis on the same level as Mason, it’d be spending a total of $6 million on goaltenders. (Would they be overpaid in that case? Of course they would, because all goalies in the NHL are overpaid if you apply the laws of supply and demand. But hey, it’s the going rate.)
That move would hardly put the Predators in a class by themselves, though. At least 10 teams will be using up $6 million or more in cap space on goalies next season and, after all, this is a team that is willing to give up $4.5 million in cap room to David Legwand, who is essentially a third-line center.
What the Predators have in Ellis is a very good goalie who is about to enter his prime. And while - with the exception of guys such as Dominik Hasek and Martin Brodeur - fans generally don’t pay good money to watch goalies stop pucks, they do pay to watch teams win. And with Ellis in their net, the Preds give themselves the best chance to do that.
Should Ellis hit the UFA market July 1, there will be no shortage of suitors. It will be a shock if the Ottawa Senators don’t think long and hard about Ellis, and the Red Wings - who will be looking for goaltending next season - just had a front-row seat for Ellis’s playoff show. The Atlanta Thrashers and possibly the Los Angeles Kings will likely be looking at him, as will the Washington Capitals and Colorado Avalanche if their No. 1 goalies bolt for other teams.
Signing Ellis long-term won’t guarantee the Predators any sustained playoff success or the future of the franchise in Nashville, but what it will do is show its fans and the rest of the NHL it will not allow other teams to pick its carcass the way they did last summer.
And in the absence of any tangible success in the post-season, doing that is just as important as winning in the playoffs for the Predators these days. If they are willing to let quality players go as soon as they put themselves in a position to get a good contract, why should anyone in Nashville stick with them?
Ken Campbell is a senior writer for The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears Tuesdays and Fridays and his column, Campbell's Cuts, appears Mondays.
For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.
Anthony (Posted 2008-04-23 13:42:26)
How did this turn from "Should they re-sign Ellis" to "How Nashville spends it's tax revenue"?? Craig.. you're starting an argument where there is none. The article doesn't focus on the Preds staying or leaving Nashville.
Back to the REAL issue, "Should they re-sign Ellis"? YES, they should. Whether or not it worked out with Mason should not deter them. For all they know, Mason will come back and steal the job from Ellis next year (if he's back). Either way, ever since the lock-out, it has become more apparent than ever, that teams need two good goalies. Anaheim and Carolina both had 2 goalies that carried them through the season and stabilized certain games of their playoff runs. Spending $6M on two goalies that can stop the puck is not a big expense (especially when you point out langkow, as Ken did).
I know there are lots of "ok" goalies out there, but it's better to make a deal with the devil you know than the devil you don't. With Ellis, they know what to expect and hopefully they keep him around. Nothing is worse, to me, than seeing a goalie have a "break-out year" only to move to another team and have to get use to their systems and players (not to mention different opponents' tendencies) and get blamed for poor numbers. Just look at Toskala this year, it took some time but he got use to the Leafs (and the tendencies of their opponents) and stood on his head for the last half of the season.
Craig (Posted 2008-04-22 18:30:55)
Just because it's common makes it no less ridiculous. Are you telling me that your govenrment is powerless to assert nay sort of discretion over how they allocate funds? it is a normal and common practice to draw up an "Annual Budget" where in funds are allocated to the appropriate innitiatives. Does your city and state opperate differently? and if so why do you bother electing a government, why not just hire a managing director and a CGA with a team of auditors to double check everything was spent in it legal pre destined places? How does your city account for ever changing expenses and population shifts? Aging demographics, inflation, etc...? Do you so easily swallow all pills? As for Magical; I find it magical that the supposedly educated masses of the wealthiest nation on Earth continue to allow state and city governments to so poorly fritter away their tax dollars when your school system, social programs and healthcare are continuing to erode.
Dirk Hoag (Posted 2008-04-22 15:16:04)
Craig, people can certainly argue (and they have) as to whether any current funds that will now be directed to the Predators organization might be better directed towards other endeavors (such as a new convention center downtown, for example), but Campbell's characterization in the article above was way off base. Nowhere did I say that this is the best possible of all ways to use these funds; I'm just calling Campbell out on the carpet for misrepresenting the situation. And by the way, it's quite common for governments to tie particular programs (like schools) to particular funding areas (like property tax). It's not "magical and ridiculous", it's found in just about any city or state government.
Craig (Posted 2008-04-22 13:39:10)
Leave the Predators where they are, move them to Carson City, I don't care, but somebody get that Idiot Aquilini on the line and have him steall away Poile for my ever worsening Canucks. the man is the most underrated GM in the league. And Dirk even if you are soblindly convinced that "the seperate tax steam of tourism revenue" couldn;t be transferred to schools or social programs due to some magical and ridiculous clause, don't you think there would be a greater benefit to your city if these funds, however small, were redirected into say Healthcare, Environmental sustainability, Low Income Housing, A National advertising campaign to promote the city, a public event, more police, public parks, highway and road up keep and city infrastructure or day care to free up single parents join the workforce? Or is there some law in your city that specifically states that in the event the city of Nashville should not have a money losing sports franchise available to suck up funds from public coffers, said money from this seperate revenue stream shall be burned in a glorious bonfire at state expense, thus prohibiting it's use for any other socially beneficial causes?
Dirk Hoag (Posted 2008-04-22 11:21:32)
Doug, what you don't understand is that a good portion of the revenue stream relative to the arena lease is generated through Predators games; without the Preds, the revenue stream disappears, to be replaced only in small part by other events that could be held there.
As to other tourism tax dollars, yes of course those could be used for other purposes, but not for "schools and social programs". Those come out of the general fund, which is largely driven by property tax.
Joe (Posted 2008-04-21 22:58:34)
It's in Manatoba. right next to Ontario, right above the Dakotas.
just so you know Bill.
bill (Posted 2008-04-21 21:10:32)
doug- whats Winnipeg?? i have never heard of that place.
Doug (Posted 2008-04-21 20:53:18)
Joe - They didn't have the attendance last year when they had one of the best teams in the league. Move this franchise to Winnepeg already.
Joe (Posted 2008-04-21 19:57:41)
Heres a question Johnny nashville... if the preds were at the bottom of the league, and were for 3or4 years in a row, would you still have the attendance? would the intrest still be there from every angle? and you don't have to fix the numbers, everyone knows your attendance is not an average of 14,000. But you defend the Preds Well, I'll give you that!
Doug (Posted 2008-04-21 17:16:25)
Dirk you clearly don't understand that if the Preds didn't exist in Nashville that the so called "seperate revenue stream" you speak about could be put to other uses. This is the arguement others have and they are not wrong. I am not advocating the Preds move, I am saying your point is not a valid one.
Dirk Hoag (Posted 2008-04-21 17:09:46)
The crack about "the City of Nashville is taking potential tax dollars out of things such as schools and social programs in an effort to keep the Predators from leaving town." is completely off-base. Funding relative to the terms of the Sommet Center lease comes from tourism tax dollars, which is a separate revenue stream from that used to support schools and social programs.
Brian (Posted 2008-04-21 15:47:00)
Very good article Mr. Campbell... I think you wrote it but... I've read it three times, and... I just can't find a sentence that complains about fighting or violence in hockey... Hey, are we sure this is a Ken Campbell story ?
J.W. (Posted 2008-04-21 15:29:44)
I bet half the people in Nashville don't even know they have a team yet alone were in the playoffs.
It's only a matter of time untill the new owners and the city realize that they are not making any money down there.
Chris (Posted 2008-04-21 14:00:45)
hey Bill, you can't forget the time Lidstrom scored on Cloutier in the playoffs from around the same spot as this one on Ellis. It was a crappy bounce for Ellis, but there's no reason to drag Osgood (who played spectacularly in this series) into the discussion, Lidstrom was attempting to bounce the puck on Ellis and he did just that. It's not like Ellis was being attacked in the article, so why attempt to belittle another goaltender that hasn't done anything to deserve it?
someguy (Posted 2008-04-21 13:59:37)
I hate hockey in the south but I think the Preds can make it work in Nashville. Every guy with a jacked up F150 (minus the dent in the side were he tried to jump his sled in at 3 in the morning and didn’t quite make it) is a Hockey fan that just doesn’t realize it yet.
Bill Glover (Posted 2008-04-21 12:19:40)
I think it would be a shame to let Ellis go as the only reason Nashville got as far as it did was due to Dan Ellis. Not due to any great play by any of their other marquee players. This guy has more than paid his dues and proven his worth. Oh by the way if you want to talk about the fluke goal by Lidstrom just remember Osgood let in a goal from outside the blue line a few years back by Al MacInnis.