• Print

THN.com Blog: Teams should win the right to select No. 1 overall

Should teams have to earn the right to draft a talent like Steven Stamkos? (Photo by Dale MacMillan/Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Should teams have to earn the right to draft a talent like Steven Stamkos? (Photo by Dale MacMillan/Getty Images)

The NHL’s draft drawing system isn’t severely broken, but rewarding futility with the privilege of selecting the best prize available has always gnawed at me.

In some years, the “happenstance” of being brutal can translate into outrageous fortune – a Sidney Crosby, Alex Ovechkin, Mario Lemieux, Vincent Lecavalier.

The end-of-season lottery for the non-playoff teams provides a modicum of disincentive to “tank” the season, but doesn’t go far enough. We still see instances where bottom-feeder lineups more closely resemble AHL than NHL rosters. Heck, in Toronto this season many fans were clamoring for the club to trade some of its best, highest-priced assets in the hopes of losing more games and securing a better draft position.

Deep down, however, no real fan wants to see his or her team lose. It runs contrary to our competitive instincts. One solution would be to tweak the lottery weighting, giving all non-playoff teams increased odds at improving their draft slot, effectively eliminating the temptation to stink.

But if you want to get revolutionary and put some bite into what has traditionally been pooch time, how about installing a system whereby a team would actually have to “win” the right to select first overall?

Here’s a suggestion, one a friend of mine floated a few years ago and I’ve since modified:

• Reduce the length of the regular season by four games and invite more teams into the playoffs (either two or four).

• The remaining 10 or 12 teams would compete in an NCAA-style, single-game elimination tournament for the first overall pick. The higher-seeded teams would get home-ice advantage.

• The winner of the final game would draft No. 1, the runner-up No. 2 and so on. The traditional draft order would kick in after the non-playoff teams are positioned.

A radical concept? Perhaps. But imagine the buzz that would still exist in places such as Phoenix, Columbus and Long Island. Those franchises have diminished hopes at selecting Steven Stamkos as things exist, and little incentive to compete hard the rest of the way (other than pride and, for some, job security). Put the carrot of the No. 1 pick in their paths, however, and coaches and GMs would be compelled to ice their absolute best lineup nightly in order to secure home-ice in a one-game playoff. Fans in Toronto, Atlanta and St. Louis would still have something to cheer for.

Related Links

And the biggest loser wouldn’t be handed the biggest opportunity to land the biggest prize.

My two cents
There’s a school of thought that says as long as you tolerate fighting at the NHL level, you need to keep it in major junior in order to prepare players for the big leagues. Hogwash.

While it’s true the majority of bruisers develop in the CHL, 40 percent of the league’s players don’t and fisticuffs aren’t permitted in the NCAA or Europe. And we’ve absolutely seen punchers emerge from those feeder systems. Among this season’s 12 most frequent fighters, three played U.S. college (George Parros, Adam Burish and Aaron Voros). Historically, a smattering of fight club members such as Chris Nilan (NCAA), Andrei Nazarov (Russia), Krzysztof Oliwa (Poland), have come from outside major junior.

Combine that with the fact more than 300 players will have engaged in at least one NHL fight this season, and the original premise is rendered moot.

Whatever path the three CHL loops eventually forge on fighting, a culture shift is required. Players who don’t want to brawl shouldn’t feel compelled to do so, especially considering the age gap between some of the teen participants. If they aren’t going to outlaw it completely (my personal preference), leave it to the willing participants. A punch thrown at an opponent who clearly doesn’t want to engage should result in an automatic match penalty and suspension.

Jason Kay is the editor of The Hockey News and a regular contributor to THN.com. His blog appears every weekend.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (24)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Pat Mete Posted
(2009-04-30 06:07:58)



Interesting concept. The problem I see is that players and coaches on non-playoff teams don't care about the draft order. If you are a non-playoff player or coach, odds are you won't be playing for that team next season, so what do you care who or where they draft. Any doubts, ask the Frozen No Trade 5 on the Toronto Maple Leafs if they care who the Leafs select.
    0



steve duncan Posted
(2009-04-30 06:07:51)



this might be as ratical as it gets,but how about have the leagues rankings of potential picks stand in order.in which case the players can choose in that order which team they would want to play for.the team selected by the player then has the right to refuse.
    0



Brian Kemp Posted
(2009-04-30 06:07:50)



As has been stated already, the draft is supposed to make the worst teams better, or at least give them a chance to improve. If the league adopted the "Draft Tournament" idea, or Brian van Vliet's idea, why bother with a draft at all? Why not just go back to the way it was before the draft, and have a sponsorship system, where all teams have their shot at players, and can sign them as young as they want to? No, the current system works best, and while it might seem annoying that Pittsburgh has figured out Years of Mismangement+Luck=Fantastic Young Talent, it's better than half of the league having little or no shot to ever improve. Oh, and I believe Ottawa tanked too, only for Daigle, so that worked out well for them.
    0



James Finney Posted
(2009-04-30 06:07:49)



You think there should be MORE teams in the playoffs? They already include over half the league! I'm fine with the 8 teams, but if anything knock it down to six so that a little more than 1/3 would get in. It already doesn't mean much at times for a team to make the playoffs, why would you want to make it mean even less?
    0



Brian van Vliet Posted
(2009-04-30 06:07:49)



I agree, I wrote an article about the draft for my website months ago... NHL Rewards Failure Written by Brian van Vliet - June 20, 2007 So the annual NHL draft is about to take place . Once again one of the worst teams from last season will be rewarded with the first overall draft pick. Quite a nice present from the league considering all a team has to do is be completely inept for a year. Never mind the teams that try to be fiscally responsible and put a good competitive product on the ice each season. Those teams usually finish around the middle of the pack. They then end up getting a decent but not great draft pick that will allow them to improve enough to finish, well middle of the pack. Since 1990, Quebec which became Colorado had two first overall picks. In 1996 and 2001, Colorado won Stanley Cups. Tampa Bay had two first overall picks. Roman Hamrlik in 92 and Vincent Lecavalier in 98. In 2004 Tampa Bay won the Stanley Cup. The Ottawa Senators had the first pick in 93, 95 and 96. In 2007 the Ottawa Senators were three games away from winning their first Cup. The list goes on and on… However no team on the planet has taken advantage of being a loser more than the Pittsburgh Penguins. The Penguins were crap in the 1980's and managed to be rewarded with Mario Lemieux and Jaromir Jagr. In 91 and 92 the Penguins won Stanley Cups. The Penguins then proved how inept they were by going in the tank again for a number of years in the 2000's. Their reward?? Marc Andre Fleury first overall in 2003, Evgeni Malkin 2nd overall in 2004 and Sidney Crosby first overall in 2005. The Penguins are now a legitimate Cup contender. Teams like the Toronto Maple Leafs and the Boston Bruins who tend to always be middle of the pack, will always remain there should the current system remain intact. Congratulations to the Chicago Black Hawks for finding the magic formula by finishing near the bottom of the league and being up for the first pick in 2007. I say we go back to the old system where every team is entered into a lottery with an equal chance of getting the first pick. That way, no more teams will sandbag the end of the season to get the first pick. So if there is a God above and he is listening, please don't allow the Pittsburgh Penguins to ever win another Stanley Cup again!! Agree or disagree, I’m off the goalpost.
    0



Fredrik Vilborg Posted
(2009-04-30 06:07:49)



Brian van Vliet, Jagr was taken with the 5th choice in 1990, something for Toronto to look for?
    0



Cid Posted
(2009-04-30 06:07:48)



There are so many problems with the loser playoffs ideas, I hardly know where to start. Firstly, as other posters have said, the whole point of the entry draft is to push talent into rosters where it is lacking. Secondly, as a fan who has followed the game for around 20 years now, most will agree that few players are a sure bet- remember for every Lemieux or Crosby, you've also had Kip Millers, Jamie Storrs, Alexandre Daiges and Pat Falloons. Lastly, the thing some of you might forget, teams in the U.S. don't sell out the way the TMLs do- if L.A. or Phoenix or Florida sucks, their attendance drops- that's the biggest incentive for a U.S. team to field a winner- they make more money. I have to say, I'm surprised at how badly Tampa Bay is playing this year, but tanking on purpose? Come on. You think a competitor like LeCavalier is tanking it?
    0



neilw Posted
(2009-04-30 06:07:47)



Why not turf out the worst three teams like they do in English football? Best 3 teams from the AHL come up to replace them. You can loan players from NHL to AHL instead of having farm teams. Teams like the Islanders are basically a bunch of castoffs anyway. Tinkering with the system is not going to any good. Proof that teams don't tank lies in the fact that most team's starting goalies play an absurd amount of games in proportion to their backups.
    0



ACW Posted
(2009-04-30 06:07:47)



Under this system, how would a truly terrible team ever improve?
    0



Steve Posted
(2009-04-30 06:07:46)



Don Cherry said it best on Coach's Corner last night when he said fighting should REMAIN in major junior hockey because if a player doesn't want to fight then he doesn't have to just like in the NHL. That's what enforcers are for and all his other elder teammates of say a 16 year in the OHL getting bullied into a fight by a 20 yr old should stick up for him. The enforcers and older players should protect the younger ones that don't want to fight, it's a simple thing that brings a team closer together when they fight for each other and plus fans like me love fighting in hockey be it the NHL or OHL. The draft selection in the NHL doesn't bother me since my Red Wings find great players in the 5th and later rounds anyway so how the NHL decides what team gets what draft slots means little to me. Example Anders Ericcson - last pick in the NHL draft and will be a top defenseman in a year or two with the Red Wings from what I've seen of him. To sum it up, bad teams will usually always find a way to draft badly in general.
    0



1 2 3

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Who should start in goal for Russia at the Olympics?






THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I was coming in to take the boards away and had some good jump. He bobbled the puck at the last second and I don’t think he saw me coming at all. It was a shoulder right in his chest. He’s eight feet tall, so it’s not like you could hit him in the head.”

- Ottawa's Chris Neil about a hit he threw on Tampa's Victor Hedman Thursday night, causing Hedman to leave the game.

Our Partners