• Print

Brian Duff's Blog: Thomas Vanek set up for failure

Thomas Vanek has managed only 12 goals and 25 points in 41 games this season in Buffalo.

Zoom Image

Thomas Vanek has managed only 12 goals and 25 points in 41 games this season in Buffalo.

At 23-and-a-half, he had the world by the tail. Six months later, his family’s finances secure for generations to come, the world of hockey is spinning him by the tail, in a tale of too much too soon for a player who has yet to complete his third NHL season.

On Jan. 19, Thomas Vanek will turn 24. And try as he might to live up to the pressure of a seven-year pact worth $50 million, nothing on the ice is going his way.
 
You know, it’s funny. When Vanek signed his long-term deal, a lifelong supporter of the team suggested to me “a contract like this could kill his career.” Sadly, her foreshadowing has been accurate so far.

On pace for 24 goals, he had 43 a year ago. On pace for eight power play goals, he had 15 a year ago, his front-of-net presence a mere fraction of what it used to be. Nine multi-goal games last season, he has none in 2007-08. A catalyst in the Sabres run to the 2007 Presidents’ Trophy, his team appears likely to miss the 2008 post-season altogether.

And therein lies the problem. It’s his team, and it shouldn’t be. It’s not like he’s wearing the ‘C’, but what did you think was going to happen in wake of Buffalo matching (which they had to do) the Oilers’ ridiculous offer sheet? Of course, all the attention would be on him. From fans, media and opposition players alike.

When one looks at the chances he gets, and the raw ability he has, there’s no doubt he should become a consistent 35-plus goal-scorer for the better part of his career.

Related Links

But in reality, he had very little chance of succeeding this season.

Sabres fans are reminded with each passing loss that someone in the organization (Darcy Regier, Larry Quinn or Tom Golisano) botched things royally by letting Chris Drury walk. Daniel Briere they could have lived without, but not Drury.

With Tim Connolly having yet to return to the level he was at prior to being clobbered by Ottawa’s Peter Schaefer in the 2005 playoffs (a condition also partially due to other nagging injuries) and Derek Roy having not yet matured into top-line status (will he ever, despite contract projections to the contrary?), this team does not have a No. 1 center.

There aren’t many young wingers who have been able to operate at an all-star level without the aid of a somewhat dynamic playmaker. (Yes, Roy was Vanek’s centerman for most of last year, too, but he did so as the team’s No. 3 center, therefore having far more room to operate.)

So until management/ownership rectifies that problem, Vanek has only one ally, that being time.

Unfortunately for him, sports fans are notoriously impatient. And Sabres management has been just the opposite. Patience cost them quality players to free agency over the past two summers. It will cost them dearly again if they don’t lock up Brian Campbell.

And without shaking things up via a trade prior to the Feb. 26 deadline, they run the risk of quickly falling back into pre-lockout mode, when they missed the playoffs for three straight years.

 

COMMENTS (15)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Elliot Posted
(2009-04-30 07:28:50)



vanek leads the nhl with 24 goals in 30 games, this isn't the the most accurate assessment
    0



Elliot Posted
(2009-04-30 07:28:50)



The retard that said "he dosnt like to get his nose dirty" ? look at how he scores, he's crashing and banging in front of the net all game long. Clearly you have not played hockey, because i do, and that's the toughest place on the ice to be
    0



Tommy Posted
(2009-04-30 05:58:47)



The 2006-05 and 2006-07 Sabres remind me of the 1992-93 and 1993-94 Leafs. Both teams will have good seasons going down the stretch, but can never be like the streaking Red Wings or the 20-straight-playoff-years Bruins. Both need better front office staff.
    0



joe Posted
(2009-04-30 05:58:45)



Roy centered Vanek and Afinagenov last season. When all 3 were healthy they were one of the best lines in hockey. This season they have not played much if at all together. They had chemistry. Thats hard to find and impossible to beat no matter how talented the defenders are playing against them.
    0



Jim Ziccarelli Posted
(2009-04-30 05:58:43)



First of all, I want to say how good it was to read Chris Silcox's statements. Vanek had a choice in signing the offer sheet from Edmonton and I have not heard one person here in Buffalo mention that. So obviously, Vanek wouldn't have minded leaving here. Second, I'm tired of hearing that the Sabres "had" to match the offer. They didn't have to do anything. Sure, they lost their top two players but I'll tell you what; I'll take 12 Paul Gaustad's or 12 Adam Mair's before I take Vanek. I've watched many games and have been to many Sabres game this year and for the most part he's invisible out there. He literally stands a zone ahead of the puck just waiting for it to come to him. It is glaring that he does not like to get his nose dirty, especially in the corner, and he will not step into anyone from the opposing team. Forget his goals and points from last year, his lack of passion and effort don't fit here in Buffalo. If only we could trade him to Edmonton now...
    0



BB Posted
(2009-04-30 05:58:43)



I have to respectfully disagree with Mr. Duff's assessment of Vanek as having "raw talent." In fact, Vnaek's lack of production this year is testament to a lack of talent. In his first year, he was benched because of his erratic play --fair enough, he was a rookie. Last year's stats were the result of other people's talent creating opportunities for him. He can't finish this year because he has no exceptional speed, no real stick handling ability (the other teams' d-men must be relieved when he tries to drag the puck) and an inability to find the back of the net --think Espo without the snap shot,drive, and leadership. His only utility is creating a screen and getting the odd deflection. He is lucky that they negotiated his salary last year as the Sabres have paid steak prices for a ham-and-egger.
    0



Samantha M Posted
(2009-04-30 05:58:43)



I have a few comments: 1- for a winger *with talent* to score goals, he doesn't necessarily need a good centerman. Look at Pavel Bure. He never played with a top tier center- (Trevor Linden was close), or on a good team, yet he scored 437 NHL goals in a career cut short by injury. But Bure played with a lot more drive and had more skill than Vanek is currently displaying. (which brings me to my next point..) 2- Last year the Sabres were a team built on heart and grit and a well-balanced scoring attack. True, they lost Briere and Drury, which lost a ton of offence, and many intangibles, such as the clutch performer, but they are starting to show signs of life. Hecht is emerging as the clutch guy and some of the rookies and 3rd liners are stepping up big time. While no Sabre has more than 14 goals, they've got 5 players in the double-digits on a team that is really strugglin to score at all right now. What I'm not seeing from Vanek is DESIRE. He doesn't play like he cares if the Sabres win or lose. The Effort isn't there, and that is what sticks in the craw of any self-respecting fan watching their team shove money into a black hole. If he was playing like last year and just not scoring, that would be excuseable *i.e. Jason Pominville, who has more heart in his little finger than Vanek* but this lackluster play on the ice is inexcuseable. (he does (finally) have 10 goals, but based on the skill level we have seen him show, he should have more. He COULD be the leader on the team but until he gives Ruff a reason to award him the "C" I don't think that will happen. THe Sabres management awards the captaincy each month based on leadership and performance and Vanek is worthy of neither at this point. I hope, as a Sabres fan, that he (and the rest of the boys) step it up and soon to prove that while we do miss Drury and Briere, we don't NEED them.
    0



Tara Posted
(2009-04-30 05:58:42)



I find it interesting that this article states that Briere's loss was relatively insignificant in comparison to Drury's, and then leads directly into a discussion of the lack of a dynamic playmaking center as a major reason for Vanek's inability to operate at a top-tier level. While Drury could have filed important roles on the team, taking pressure off Vanek's offensive responsibilities is not one of them. As for Vanek's performance this season, it's disappointing but not surprising. He's dealing with top defensive match-ups that were previously drawn primarily by Briere's line while he feasted on third liners. Added to the pressures of the contract, he's obviously not ready for the new situation. However, while still early, he is being paid an enormous contract and absolutely needs to produce. Regression from last year's performance is not a good start.
    0



Chris Silcox Posted
(2009-04-30 05:58:40)



The big difference here is I don't make millions of dollars a year for playing a game.
    0



Wes Posted
(2009-04-30 05:58:38)



As an Oilers fan, man i'm glad he stayed in Buffalo.
    0




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners