• Print

Double OT: NHL will never get rid of instigator rule

The idea of fighters, like Wade Belak and Cam Janssen, policing the game is one the NHL will never endorse.

Zoom Image

The idea of fighters, like Wade Belak and Cam Janssen, policing the game is one the NHL will never endorse.

You hear it nearly every week – get rid of the instigator rule.

That’s right. Let the fighters rule the NHL, just like the gunslingers did in the wild, wild west. Just like the Broad Street Bullies did in the ’70s when they scared the daylights out of half the league.

While we’re at it, let’s arm motorists, so if somebody follows too closely or cuts you off, you can pull out your piece and shoot out their tires. Let’s give grocery store cashiers baseball bats so if somebody gets in the 10-or-fewer items line with 12, they can be kneecapped.

Oh, and let’s allow Chris Simon to drop his gloves and beat Ryan Hollweg to a pulp because Hollweg, who is not a fighter, has the audacity to hit him. Let’s let Chris Simon slug the snot out of Jarkko Ruutu because, like Hollweg, he banged the Islanders’ aging tough guy.

Give me a break.

Listen, I am neither naïve or delusional. I’ve played against players like Hollweg and Ruutu and, yes, it can be frustrating. But the last time I looked, hitting in the NHL is allowed – even encouraged.

Here’s a novel idea for NHL players – if you don’t like the way Ryan Hollweg or Jarkko Ruutu hit your teammates, hit them back. Drive them hard into the boards. Crunch them with an open-ice hit. Get even or, heaven forbid, drop your gloves and fight them whether they want to fight back or not. Take that whopping risk of receiving an extra minor penalty for being the instigator.

I am certain Hollweg and Ruutu (and others of their ilk), if given the choice, would elect to be goal-scorers rather than pests, but they aren’t. They do, however, possess some skill and clearly their energy and hitting ability are valued by their teams. It is what keeps them in the NHL.

Related Links

People complain about the NHL taking hitting out of the game (which is absolutely bogus) as it makes adjustments to give skilled players more room to operate and then when a guy goes out and delivers a hit, everybody wants to beat the crap out of him. So which is it, do we want hitting or don’t we? Or can only players who fight be hitters?

The NHL will never, ever get rid of the instigator penalty. It would be so politically incorrect it defies consideration. The league says repeatedly it is comfortable with where fighting is now, largely because stiff penalties have eliminated nasty brawls. Fact is, we see more brawls in baseball than we do in hockey these days.

You think Gary Bettman is going to stand before a microphone and tell the world the league has decided, for the good of the game, the NHL will let goons run the show? Ain’t gonna happen, folks.

Not now. Not ever.

Mike Brophy's Double OT appears regularly on The Hockey News.com.

One of THN’s senior writers, Mike Brophy gives you insight and opinion on the world of hockey like no one else. Subscribe to The Hockey News to get Mike's expertise delivered to you every issue.

COMMENTS (11)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Les Randall Posted
(2009-04-30 05:58:43)



It's no wonder Brophy doesn't want to get rid of the instigator. He probably thinks all teams should play that wimpy, hid behind the ref and run to the commissioner, game that the Leafs are so good at. Someone should remind the Toronto media that hockey used to be a man's game.
    0



Shawn Daly Posted
(2009-04-30 05:58:25)



The instigator rule has made the Enforcer useless. Now everyone's a goon, skating around the ice delivering dangerous hits and getting everyone's panties in a knot when someone gets injured. Getting rid of this rule would make players like Downie and Simon think twice before playing hockey like they does.. I mean.. it's not like any of these current rules are working.
    0



thomas kanyak Posted
(2009-04-30 05:57:12)



Brophy's histrionics about what will happen if the instigator rule is removed was amusing. He did not back up any of his futuristic vision of a 'CLockwork Orange' NHL with any facts.The brawling will never return to hockey because of other rules that have enacted since the broad Street Bully days of the mid 70's. An absurd article.The instigator rule has to go.
    0



Doug Posted
(2009-04-30 05:57:12)



Get real Broph. The sticks are up, hits to the head are up, hits from behind are up. Skill players are getting crushed. Their team mates stand there and mostly do nothing (At least on the gutless Oilers) because their candy cane coaches are afraid to take a penalty. Hockey today is garbage hockey, trap dump and cycle. Give me the early 80s where scoring was considered an art not how good you played the left wing lock, and where if someone touched Gretzky he basically died.
    0



Lorne Matheson Posted
(2009-04-30 05:57:12)



Maybe a compromise, two minutes for "intentional instigating". And misconducts for goons who "go" just for the hell of it. The best hockey fights are emotional. Fighting is in the game to allow the defusing of emotion. Let a guy wail with bare fists for 30 seconds and he might not break a wrist with a vicious slash. The best fights in the past involved Orr, Howe, and Hull. Today I love watching Lecavalier, Iginla, or Shanahan fight. The instigator has not gotten the Carcillos or Bolls out of the league. Try something different.
    0



Michael Posted
(2009-04-30 05:57:12)



It is funny for a paper that knocks Commissioner Bettman not appealing to the demands of the fans to take a stance in favor of something that the majority of hockey fans believe is killing the game. As one of my peers stated in the 80s scoring was up, you couldnt touch star players without suffering the consequences, and hockey was more of a marketable product. As for the theory about players policing the game, with the officiating ive seen so far this year, we need as many "policemen" on the ice as possible. P.S. For all those who believe that Ryan Hollweg should be considered a fighter have never actually witnessed him fight or else they would change their stance. This is coming from a die hard Ranger fan. Hollweg fighting is truely a pitiful sight.
    0



Biff Whipley Posted
(2009-04-30 05:57:10)



I was hoping the HockeyNews would just report facts because I stopped believing everything else all the other reporters spew out. Please just tell it like it is. I believe Mr. Hollweg hit Chris Simon into the boards from behind. While Simon may have turned into the boards (it's a grey area) Hollweg knew what he was doing. It's time to get rid of braindead dinosaurs like Colin Campbell and corporate brownnosers like Gary Bettman. The NHL's owners can lie with statistics just like the media but sooner rather than later we're going to see some contraction in the NHL because there aren't enough fans. If you continue to "spindoctor" facts why don't you go work for Fox News. I'm sure Bill O'Reilly needs a break.
    0



Greg Posted
(2009-04-30 05:57:10)



The instigator penalty needs to be abolished. It protects players who make negligent hits (ie. the flyers). Instead of punishing players who are sticking up for their teammates the nhl should increase the length of suspensions for illegal hits. A 20+ game suspension will stop players from slamming each other into the boards from behind. The instigator penalty only protects these hits by taking accountability away the players who make dirty hits.
    0



Ken Brown Posted
(2009-04-30 05:57:10)



Once again the hockey news is preaching their no fighting philosiphy. Even though most every poll they've taken shows the majority of fans like me want to abolish the instigator rule. Let the enforcers protect the star players and goaltenders, and eliminate all these cheap shots that go unpunished.
    0



Tobold Posted
(2009-04-30 05:57:09)



It's not like the instigator rule would protect star players anyways. The kinds of players who go after stars are generally the same players who have no trouble at all dropping the gloves with the opposing enforcer. The possibility of a fight isn't going to stop a Brashear from elbowing a Crosby. The only thing that actually scares these kinds of players is losing their jobs. Hence, the only thing that will protect stars from being run is zero-tolerance for 'intent to injure'. Expulsion from the league and nothing less. So long as it's a suspension and a bloody nose for running a star, the best players will continue to be targets.
    0




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners