• Print

Rand Simon's Blog: Another lockout looming?

Because of the decreased age for unrestricted free agency, teams are trying to lock up players like Jason Spezza with long-term deals.

Zoom Image

Because of the decreased age for unrestricted free agency, teams are trying to lock up players like Jason Spezza with long-term deals.

Hockey fans everywhere had to be nervous about what the future holds for the game after Montreal Canadiens’ owner George Gillett was recently quoted as saying: “But it is still a very difficult business when you have your player payroll at 54 or 55 percent of your total revenue.”

If Gillett’s comments are an accurate reflection of what other owners think, then it is hard to be optimistic that a work stoppage can be avoided when the current CBA expires on Sept. 15, 2011 (the players have the right to extend the agreement by one year or terminate it two years early).

At the current pace of revenue growth, the players will be receiving almost exactly 57 percent of revenues in 2010-11 (the players were at 55.6 percent in 2006-07 and the percentage rises as league revenues do), which presumably would make it an even more difficult business for the owners.

On the other hand, Gillett himself appears to have things relatively easy compared to the majority of his colleagues. According to Forbes.com, the Montreal Canadiens had revenue of $109 million (U.S.) last season. With a 2006-07 payroll of approximately $42 million (U.S.), the Canadiens were spending only 38.5 percent of their revenue on player payroll.

That figure actually puts the Canadiens more in line with the average Major League Baseball team that spent, on average, 41 percent of its revenue on player payroll.

Does anyone else find it ironic that NHL players earn nearly 56 percent of its league’s revenues under what some have criticized as being a poor agreement for the players, while MLB players earn only 41 percent of its league’s revenues under an agreement generally perceived to be the most player-friendly in sports?

In any event, baseball is the outlier when it comes to the four major North American team sports. NBA and NFL players take home about 57 percent of their respective league’s revenues.

YOUNG AND WEALTHY There has been a recent trend for teams to lock up their top young players to long-term contracts at significant dollars. Among the players who recently signed contract extensions beginning next season are Ottawa’s Jason Spezza, Los Angeles’ Dustin Brown and Minnesota’s Brent Burns.

As such, there has been a significant shift in the demographics of the game’s highest paid players. In 2003-04, the last season prior to the lockout, there were 84 players who were compensated at $4 million or higher. Among those 86, only one (Joe Thornton) was 24 or younger as of January 1, 2004. Another 15 were between the ages of 25 and 29.

Now fast forward to the 2008-09 season. There are 86 players scheduled to make at least $4 million that season. Using ages as of January 1, 2009, there are six players aged 24 and younger in that salary bracket and another 24 who will be 25 to 29 years of age.

To summarize, in 2003-04 only 18.6 percent of the highest paid players were less than 30 years of age. For 2008-09 that number currently sits at 34.9 percent – nearly double the old rate.

The number of youngsters earning at least $4 million next season will grow even further once players such as Washington’s Alex Ovechkin and Calgary’s Dion Phaneuf sign extensions or new contracts next summer. Anaheim’s Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry, Nashville’s Shea Weber and Philadelphia’s Mike Richards are other players in the under-24 age group in line for significant raises.

CASE CLOSED Spezza, Brown and Burns are three players who would have had salary arbitration rights this coming summer had they not signed extensions.

Combined with the reduction in unrestricted free agency age to 27 this season, this recent trend of locking up young players will mean fewer salary arbitration filings in the summer of 2008 than normal.

After a record of 69 players filed in the summer of 2006, there were just 29 filings last summer (only seven cases made it to hearing). Don’t be surprised if that number drops to the low 20s this time around.

A quick glance around the league reveals the following players as strong candidates for salary arbitration: Florida’s Jay Bouwmeester, Toronto’s Matt Stajan, Nashville’s Martin Erat, St. Louis’ Brad Boyes, Chicago’s Patrick Sharp, Buffalo’s Paul Gaustad, Ottawa’s Antoine Vermette and Columbus’ Pascal Leclaire.

Salary arbitration hearings will be held in Toronto from July 21-August 4.

Rand Simon is an NHLPA certified agent. He has spent the past 14 years with Newport Sports Management Inc.

COMMENTS (12)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Josh Miller Posted
(2009-04-30 05:54:21)



John: Winnipeg and Quebec had teams that they supported faithfully, it was the strength of the Canadian dollar (and the strength of the Canadian dollar alone) that forced those teams to move. The owners of those teams knew that it made economic sense to move to American markets, even if the fan support wasn't quite the same. Sure, in Colorado they filled the building, but that had much to do with the great team they had assembled before re-locating and the fact that they won the Stanley Cup their first year there. In Phoenix? Ahhh, not so much. Even Edmonton was close to moving in the mid-90s before a group of local businessmen saved the team at the 11th hour. As for the game being simply "okay" before the '90s expansion, when the league consisted mostly of Canadians, one could argue that the 1980s brand of firewagon hockey supplied some of the most entertaining play of all-time. Many people view that time as the "golden era" of the NHL. Having said that, I will admit that it is the defensive schemes employed by coaches over the past 10-15 years that have sucked the life out of the game, not the sudden rush of Europeans and Americans into the league.
    0



John Smith Posted
(2009-04-30 05:54:14)



I hope people realize that Quebec and Winnipeg HAD teams. They failed to support them properly and the Canadian Dollar was about $0.75 US. They could not compete with US salaries. So they left. Expansion in the US has brought hockey more fans than ever. Their was 20-21 teams before expansion. And we had nothing but Canadians and a hand full of Americans and Europeans. The game was okay and Canada got blown out every Olympic games vs the better European teams. Now we have 30 teams and the BEST American and BEST Europeans as well as Canadians. No Canadians have lost jobs just the ratio of players has changed. With Sweden, Russia, Finland, Czech, Slovak, ETC players now in the league they have filled the 10 extra rosters. Now the NHL is truly the best of the best not the best of Canada. Expansion might be possible in 3-5 years if older players keep themselves in great shape and the young talent keeps flooding in. Before expansion when you hit 30-35 years old you were done. Now players are staying fit all year round and many can play until they are close to 40. With Older players "hanging on" and new blood in the game, you watch. In 3-5 years their will be enough players for 1-2 new teams. I hear Los Vegas, Kansas City, and Hamilton, Ontario every time Pittsburgh or Nashville is rumored to move. I suppose these would be front runners. As for the lockout. If they don't really want a lockout their won't be one. Baseball players never thought the league would allow the world series to be canceled. They were wrong. The players let them selves be locked out in 2004-2005 because they never thought a season could be canceled. Now that everyone knows the owners are not messing around I think talks will be serious and things will get done. The Salary Cap was needed. As fun as it was to see Detroit with a roster full of future Hall of fame players, it was killing the league. When GMs give 3rd line roll players like Joe Murphy 3 million a year a salary cap is needed. When every player that has a good season wants 10 million a year. You need a salary cap. It took a few years for the football salary cap to level everyone out. Now look at the NHL. The Horrible teams like Pittsburgh, St. Louis, Chicago, Philadelphia, ETC can sign top players away from "good teams" and suddenly every team is a little bit closer and can compete. Its the Teams like the Patriots in the NFL that have figured out the Salary cap and how to sign guys for the right price that will begin to dominate. Thats is one reason I don't care for baseball. Any good free agent that wasn't to get paid just goes to the Yankees. Well in Hockey you cant do that anymore. Guys will have to decide. DO I want to get "Paid" or do I want to get a little less and go to a winner like football players that go to the Patriots.
    0



Kris H. Posted
(2009-04-30 05:54:12)



I think some people need to realize that Cananda is not the only place that supports hockey. And..hasn't anyone been listening to the news? There may be a lot more places in the world where there is a lack of snow & ice (that thing, called Global Warming). Unless you watch a lot games on NHL Center Ice, I don't know if you can make a statement like Columbus, Atlanta, etc. do not support their teams. Have you listened to their fans cheer them on? Lockout or no...do we really need more than 30 teams? And shouldn't we give some of these cities a long enough chance to prove themselves? Ten years is not enough to build a firm fan base in some cases.
    0



Chris D. Posted
(2009-04-30 05:54:08)



I think Gillet is posturing. He obviously skewed his numbers. I agree there should be at least one more team in canada. i also like alaska one day having a team. no more southern states for a long time. but at the same time we all know canada supports teams, let's not forget they also are responsible for some great youth leagues in the juniors. if you start getting too many teams in canada too soon you'll kill their support. someone mentioned columbus, atlanta, phoenix and nashville as being alien to hockey. i agree about nashville. but atalanta once had an nhl team, i believe they now reside in calgary. phoenix had the phoenix roadrunners and by chance i was attended a game there before the expansion and it was a packed crowd that thoroughly enjoyed being at a hickey game. i don't know why they chose columbus specifically but i know that there was a minor league team in cleveland that sold out all of their games for a some years in a row. i was told not many of fans knew much about hockey but they loved it. so alien to hockey, i wouldn't be that strong. the california teams seem to be doing well enough for hockey. there's youth hockey growth in texas now and a growing following. in st. louis, more and more players are starting to make the show and higher levels and it is becoming a stronger hockey city and our temperature has been rising since the late eighties to the point where we don't any longer know if we'll get snow in the winter, well very much of it. if you'd like to know some st. louis players: paul stastny, yan stastny, neil komandowski, ben bishop, pat maroon to name but a few playing at higher levels at this time. so will the experiment work? in the past it has in some towns. don't think the bad attendance the past two years in st. louis reflected honestly on the fan support. it was more about our previous owner throwing away the team to pear down the salary giving away pronger and letting demitra walk.
    0



Tyler Givens Posted
(2009-04-30 05:54:08)



Everyone calm down, there will be no lockout. the owners and players will do everything possible to not let the same thing happen that occured in 04-05. Count on it!
    0



Mike N, Posted
(2009-04-30 05:54:06)



I've been saying this for years, Gary Bettman has destroyed the NHL with his NBA-style of thinking. Just think if Bill Daly was NHL commissioner, he probably would not have allowed the U.S. expansion that started when the San Jose Sharks came into the NHL in the early to mid 90's. Sadly, once Quebec and Winnipeg left for Denver and Phoenix, only Ottawa was the last Canadian city to get a team. The NHL desperately needs to return to not just Quebec and Winnipeg, but expand into other Canadian cities like Regina, SK, Victoria, BC; and into some of the maritimes in Halifax, NS, where hockey is greatly supported.
    0



Tom Schettino Posted
(2009-04-30 05:54:04)



Hi Frank, could point about the player pool and the lockout, but instead of reducing the teams how about letting them move to where they will be supported? I am sure there are those in Quebec City, Winnipeg, Hamilton (okay I know the Leafs don't like that) to name a few cities who would support a team in Canada.
    0



Bob A. Posted
(2009-04-30 05:54:03)



The reason why the owners are frustrated is Bettman and company's insane policy of massive expansion into Hockey alien territory. Phoenix? Atlanta? Columbus? Nashville? It's a business model guaranteed to failure. This has nothing to do with percentages or what's fair. It's a matter of trying to sell a game to people who already have their lifelong sports commitments. Has anyone out there ever been to a US College Basketball, Football or Baseball game? Anywhere? You'll know exactly what I mean. Then there's the NBA, NFL and MLB. Game over for the NHL anywhere there's no cold, ice or snow on the ground half the year and kids don't dream of sudden death overtime and "a scramble in front of the goalie... a quick feather pass to centre - He shoots - HE SCORES!!"
    0



Greg A Posted
(2009-04-30 05:54:03)



The owners would get roasted if they tried another lock out. The had the fans on their side last time, but after getting the system they wanted, they are nuts if they think the fan support wouldn't be heavily on the players side this time around. Gauranteed Bettman would be the casualty of war this time. I can't see it happening though... I think there will be lots of changes and negotiations around free agency, RFA compensation, and arbitration. But the current framework is a good one, and just needs some tweaking to work out some kinks (like anything would after such a massive overhaul). It should be able to work for both sides, and there is no way the fans would tolerate another long stoppage after the owners already got what they wanted. (I for one was already starting to get into lacrosse last time and would definitely jump ship if another season was washed out).
    0



William Posted
(2009-04-30 05:54:03)



MLB teams also don't have a salary cap. They also don't have the New York Yankees who can spend 140+ million on players.
    0




ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Which team has been hit worst by injuries this season?










THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I don’t know if I’ll ever feel 100 percent this year.”

- New Jersey's Patrik Elias, who is recovering from hip and groin surgeries and has two points in five games this season.

Our Partners